• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Tuesday, June 17, 2025
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Danish-Norwegian Return Center in Kabul Would Experiment with Children’s Lives

Martin Lemberg-Pedersen by Martin Lemberg-Pedersen
07/11/18
in Opinion
Migrants and refugees look on after minor clashes with Greek policemen occurred at a makeshift camp at the Greek-Macedonian border near the village of Idomeni, Greece, March 2016

Tens of thousands of Afghan refugees are stuck in Greece and hope to claim asylum in the EU. Photo: Marko Djurica, Reuters.

450
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Afghan asylum seekers have been commonplace in European countries over the last decade, and unaccompanied minors constitute a growing number of them. Most of these children, who are separated from their primary caretakers, are granted a temporary residence permit, which expires when they turn 18 years old. At that point, they are deported to Afghanistan. However, recent reports from Afghanistan show that the Norwegian and Danish governments are trying to pressure Afghan authorities into a new policy. Under this new framework, the Nordic countries are allowed to conduct administrative mass deportations of unaccompanied minors back to centers in Kabul.

The two governments frame such facilities as “education and care centers,” while the Norwegian Red Cross stresses that they are in fact return centers for child deportees and constitute experimentation with the lives of children. The security situation in Afghanistan has by all counts deteriorated drastically during the last decade. Between 2008 and 2015, the number of internally displaced persons in Afghanistan rose from around 250,000 to over 1.2 million. This number is only likely to increase since Iran and Pakistan have begun deporting hundreds of thousands of Afghan refugees back to Afghanistan.

This leaves children extremely vulnerable. The number of children that are maimed or lose their lives because they are picking up bomb fragments or detonate Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) has been rising for years. Another risk is the forced recruitment by militias or the Taliban, and yet another, more taboo, concerns the sexual abuse of “dancing boys,” still common in some rural regions. These risks together mean that many Afghans often re-migrate if they are deported, or if their first attempt fails.

Not the First Time

The policy pursued by Norway and Denmark may be extremely controversial, but actually has a history over the last decade. From at least the mid-2000s, civil servant networks from several Northern European countries have collaborated on the concept of deportation of unaccompanied minors. In 2011, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Great Britain, the Netherlands, and Belgium launched the European Return Platform for Unaccompanied Minors (ERPUM), supported by funds of the European Commission.

ERPUM was a pilot project and ran between 2011 and 2014. It aimed at deporting unaccompanied Afghan minors from European countries. The pilot made use of a disjunctive phrasing, stating that children were to be returned to their families or adequate reception facilities.

This phrasing is crucial because it opened up for the deportation of unaccompanied children to Afghanistan, even if the tracing of their families was unsuccessful. Presumably, in such cases, the children were to be sent to unspecified deportation orphanages. However, despite multiple family tracing workshops and coordination meetings, no family members were traced to the extent that return procedures could be initiated, and not a single child was deported during ERPUM.

Many scholars and researchers have been critical of ERPUM’s much-publicized focus on family tracing. They have suspected that since no tracing experiences existed, the real core in the project was the construction of the deportation orphanages. To this, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR), UNICEF and Human Rights Watch also pointed out a number of serious questions, including how long children were supposed to remain in such facilities and what kind of security provisions they would have.

During ERPUM criticism flared, but the participating governments refused to disclose most of the pilot’s concrete plans, reverting instead to general claims that deportations could ensure family reunification. Additionally, interpretations of ERPUM’s means and ends differed, as governments issued contradicting statements about the desirability of forced child returns and about whether children could be deported to orphanages even before family tracing had been completed.

Worse still, between 2011 and 2013, the Danish, Norwegian and British governments were caught red-handed making false claims about collaboration with the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the UNHCR and Afghan authorities. Their claims were denied by, respectively, the IOM, the UNHCR and the Afghan Ministry of Refugees and Repatriation (MoRR).

It did not aid the ERPUM participants that from 2013 a string of massive mortar and suicide bomb-attacks started occurring, targeting the E.U.’s police mission, the IOM headquarters, and other international institutions, many of which had been highlighted by ERPUM as potential guarantors of the safety of the deported children. In October 2016, a Kabul-based hotel used by the Norwegian government to house deportees was hit by a bomb attack.

In late 2016, the E.U.-Afghanistan Joint Way Forward-deal resurrected the ambition of administratively mass deportations of unaccompanied minors. Even though the deal was not legally binding, it aimed at deporting at least 80,000 rejected Afghan asylum seekers. It surprisingly resurrected ERPUM’s link between asylum rejection and family tracing and even the disjunctive formulation, paving the way for children whose families cannot be traced to be deported to orphanages. Even though ERPUM failed, and no systematic and independent evaluation has been conducted determining the reasons for this failure, its rationale has been elevated to the Joint Way Forward-deal.

Aimed at Domestic Voters

There are therefore many reasons to be skeptic and cautious when it comes to government claims of the imminent realization of deportation orphanages for unaccompanied minors in Afghanistan. But why do these claims then keep on resurfacing? A key feature to understand is that ERPUM, the Joint Way Forward-deal, and the recent Norwegian-Danish push are actually designed to address the domestic voter bases rather than the current situation of unaccompanied Afghan minors across Europe. Both the Norwegian and the Danish government pursue right-wing immigration politics and are either constituted by or rely heavily on the votes and doctrines of nationalistic parties. The pandering to such domestic voter bases, unfortunately, appears to have made the governments more prone to misleading statements.

After the Norwegian party Fremskrittspartiet, part of the center-right government coalition, assured seats in their national parliament, it launched policies deporting more rejected asylum seekers to Afghanistan than any other country, proportionally speaking.

The party has received widespread criticism for the mass deportation of families with children to the war-torn country. In 2015, alongside Denmark and five other European countries, the Norwegians received official diplomatic notes from the Afghan authorities, who implored forced returns to be stopped until a new re-admission agreement had been negotiated.

However, the recent flurry of Norwegian-orchestrated meeting activities in Afghanistan indicates that the Norwegian and Danish governments seem intent on ignoring the long-established Afghan reluctance and warnings about their envisioned child deportation corridor.

Troubling Prospects

The elephant in the room of Nordic deportation politics is the drastically deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan. Danish and Norwegian governments gloss over the many reports about the deeply troubling prospects facing child deportees, referring instead to a possibility of “internal flight.” In doing so, they sidestep urgent and crucial questions about the consequences of deporting unaccompanied children to situations of internal displacement, escalating violence and retaliation, forced recruitment or re-migration.

A deportation corridor with such outcomes would indeed seem to experiment with the lives of children, as the consequences appear in stark contradiction with the Nordic countries self-professed obligations to ensure and protect the best interest of those children who come in contact with their asylum systems.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share450Tweet
Martin Lemberg-Pedersen

Martin Lemberg-Pedersen

Assistant Professor of Global Refugee Studies at the Department of Culture and Global Studies of Aalborg University in Denmark

Related Posts

A Taliban fighter walks past a beauty saloon with images of women defaced using a spray paint in Shar-e-Naw in Kabul on August 18, 2021
World

Afghanistan’s Taliban Government Bans ‘Violent’ Mixed Martial Arts

by Staff Writer with AFP
August 29, 2024
A migrant boat off the coast of Libya.
Refugees

UN Says 2023 Was Deadliest Year for Migrants in a Decade

by Staff Writer with AFP
March 7, 2024
A giant crawler machine used to dredge the seabed for diamonds
Environment

Norway to Allow Deep-Sea Mining

by Staff Writer
December 5, 2023
A Taliban fighter walks past a beauty parlor
World

Thousands of Afghan Salons Close as Taliban Deadline Bites

by Staff Writer
July 25, 2023
Myanmar Rohingya refugees look on in a refugee camp in Teknaf, in Bangladesh's Cox's Bazar, on November 26, 2016
Refugees

US Announces $26M in New Aid for Rohingya

by Staff Writer
March 8, 2023
Taliban fighters
Featured

UN Expert Decries ‘Systematic’ Attacks on Afghan Shiites

by Staff Writer
September 12, 2022
Next Post
Yemenis stand at the site of a Saudi air strike against Huthi rebels near Sanaa Airport in March, 2015

Yemen's Religious Minority of Bahai Relives Iranian Nightmare

People protesting in Poland

EU Can Do ‘Very Little’ to Stop Polish Judicial Reforms, Experts Say

Please login to join discussion

Recommended

Tens of thousands of protestors shut down Fifth Avenue in Manhattan on Saturday, April 5, 2025, protesting the Trump administration's abuse of the separation of federal powers as well as the deep cuts to governmental services overseen by presidential advisor Elon Musk.

Civil Society Is Holding the Line. Will Washington Notice?

June 17, 2025
An Iranian walking in front of a wall painting of the Iranian flag in Tehran

How Much Damage Has Israel Inflicted on Iran’s Nuclear Program?

June 16, 2025
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem on November 19, 2017

Israel MPs to Vote on Opposition Bid to Dissolve Parliament

June 11, 2025
Two protesters wave Mexican flags while standing on a vandalized Waymo vehicle during a demonstration in Los Angeles, California, on June 8, 2025, following a series of aggressive federal immigration operations in the city.

Unrest in Los Angeles Over Immigration Raids as Troops Sent by Trump Fan Out

June 9, 2025
US President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference in the James Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House on August 4, 2020. Photo: Drew Angerer/AFP.

US Steel, Aluminum Tariff Hikes to Take Effect Wednesday: W. House

June 4, 2025
textile workers in Kenya

Workers’ Rights in ‘Free Fall’ Globally: Report

June 2, 2025

Opinion

Tens of thousands of protestors shut down Fifth Avenue in Manhattan on Saturday, April 5, 2025, protesting the Trump administration's abuse of the separation of federal powers as well as the deep cuts to governmental services overseen by presidential advisor Elon Musk.

Civil Society Is Holding the Line. Will Washington Notice?

June 17, 2025
A Black Lives Matter mural in New York City.

Fuhgeddaboudit! America’s Erasure of History

April 2, 2025
Bust of Deputy Rubens Paiva in the Chamber of Deputies

Democratic Brazilians Are Still Here

March 18, 2025
A woman from Guatemala

Dispatch From Central America

January 28, 2025
US President Donald Trump

Dear Trump Supporters: Is This the America You Wanted?

January 28, 2025
Putin talks to Trump in Hamburg

From Roosevelt to Trump: The Complicated Legacy of Personal Diplomacy

November 15, 2024
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post