• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Saturday, May 28, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Afghanistan’s Humanitarian Crisis and “Memory Loss” of Western Conscience

Wayne Cox by Wayne Cox
08/01/18
in Opinion
Survivors walk away after a blast in the capital of Afghanistan Kabul.

Survivors walk after a blast in the capital Kabul. Photo: Mohammad Ismail, Reuters

21
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

According to the UN, 1,692 Afghan civilians have been killed in the conflict in the first half of 2018 alone. If this disturbing trend continues, the number of civilian casualties in a single year will exceed the combined military deaths of all coalition forces in Afghanistan between 2001 and 2016. Perhaps even more troubling is that 2018 saw a 52 percent increase in air raid victims.

Although many of the deaths were a result of Taliban and Islamic State (IS) operations, U.S. and Afghan airstrikes were still a major contributor to the misery of civilian life in Afghanistan. If these numbers can be trusted (UN reports often under-estimate deaths and casualties due to the extreme difficulty in verifying casualties in conflict zones), the human toll in this conflict has been devastating, and in recent years, it is getting worse – not better.

There can be no doubt that the people of Afghanistan have suffered the highest losses. As of October 2015, U.S. and coalition militaries reported a total of 3,408 soldiers killed in Afghanistan, while the lowest estimates for civilians killed in the same period with roughly 31,00 to 37,000 is about ten times as many. When one includes all casualties and those lost due to the indirect causes of war, like displacement and famine, the ratio of Afghan civilian losses to allied military losses goes from 10:1 to a staggering 100:1.

Views of the West

For the average news savvy Westerner, the war in Afghanistan is now off the radar screen. Once the U.S. and most of its NATO allies publicly proclaimed an end to “combat operations,” the general view in the West is that this war is over. Even at the peak of Western intervention, the public glimpse of this ugly conflict was heavily skewed.

Commenting upon America’s long and divisive involvement in Vietnam, Professor Marshall McLuhan famously wrote that “Vietnam was lost in the living rooms of America – not in the battlefields of Vietnam.” By this he meant that unfettered media access in Vietnam meant that Americans could sit and watch the horrors of this war on the nightly news and see their own brave young soldiers die, and even worse, they could watch how the brutal destruction and violence that their military unleashed was having devastating consequences for the civilians in Vietnam. It was a combination of what the public viewed as unclear political objectives in Vietnam and increasing empathy for the participants and victims of this war that eventually eroded America’s “will to win.”

A couple watching footage of the Vietnam War on their television, February, 1968.
Vietnam was the first “television war.” Photo: Warren K. Leffler, Public Domain

This lesson was not lost upon the U.S. and other Western militaries. Post-Vietnam wars of Western intervention have become as much wars of public relations as they have been violent conflicts. Starting with the 1990 Gulf War (the first significant U.S. post-Vietnam military intervention) media access to war zones has become tightly controlled, and most Western media’s only safe access has been to be embedded with American or allied troops.

No doubt that this dependence on the soldiers of one side for security tends to influence reporters and their views on the conflict. For the Pentagon, images of injured or dead American soldiers, or worse, images of innocent civilians being killed or wounded at the hands of Allied forces, is to be avoided at all costs.

At the same time, the honor and bravery of Western soldiers has also become highly controlled. As America and NATO became bogged down in Afghanistan for the long haul, media reports on the bravery of coalition soldiers and its heroes became the norm. Most of the news on the day to day lives of Afghan civilians centred mostly on all of the good that the NATO mission was bringing to the country – the building of roads and schools, the liberation of civilians from brutal regimes, and the belief that Western supported democracy could bring political stability to this “failed state.”

With most images “approved by military censors,” much of the news was noticeably silent on the brutal violence experienced by soldiers on all sides, and almost nothing was reported on its devastating impact on the people in Afghanistan.

As early as 2003 some Western scholars and many Middle Eastern media pundits had begun to comment upon the combination of the then Western media’s saturation of the glorifications and celebrations of the brave sacrifices made by Western soldiers in the War on Terror, and the deafening silence on the disproportionately high loss of life in those largely Muslim societies where these wars were being fought. It led scholars like Derek Gregory to comment that in the War on Terror, Western lives have great value, and the lives of Muslims simply do not matter.

Afghan Sikh men carry the coffin of one of the victims of yesterday's blast in Jalalabad city, Afghanistan July 2, 2018
Afghan men carry the coffin of a victim of an attack in Jalalabad city. Photo: Parwiz, Reuters

It should come as no surprise then that while UN reports and the voices of humanitarian groups still active in Afghanistan are trying their best to remind the world of the humanitarian crisis that is continuing in Afghanistan, many Westerners are either unaware of the crisis or are completely indifferent to it. In this sense, conditioning matters.

What the recent UN reports out of Afghanistan highlight is a very disturbing longer-term trend in modern war that deserves to be examined from a purely moral and ethical point of view. Although the business of counting war dead is a depressing and controversial game, many have noted that recent wars involving U.S. and Western intervention in mostly developing societies (and in recent years, primarily Muslim societies) has resulted in dramatic increases in the ratio of civilian to military deaths in war.

One UNICEF report on the impact of armed conflict on children reported that from the start of the 20th-century until the start of the 21st-century, civilian fatalities in wartime have risen from only 5 percent of deaths to more than 90 percent in the most recent conflicts. Economist Ruth Sivard backs these claims up through an academic analysis of war data.

Of course, much of this depends upon on how you count war dead. Most militaries only include those directly killed in military action, while others include those who die of the indirect results of war, such as through displacement, famine, and disease. Even the lowest ratios counted by Western militaries put the civilian percentage of war dead in the range of 60 to 70 percent. Any way you measure it, the numbers are high. The political consequences of largely wealthy Western states engaging in wars in places where many of the local citizens are often poor, vulnerable, defenseless, and often already victims of brutal regimes, are significant.

The overwhelming superiority of the capabilities of U.S. and its allies’ militaries (particularly air power) has only made this situation worse. With not just air superiority but often complete air domination in both surveillance and firepower, American aircrafts and drones have an almost totally unchallenged ability to unleash their lethal firepower at will. And while the U.S. Air Force and coalition air forces insist that civilians are never deliberately targeted, many civilians die as a result of Western air attacks.

Western Air Dominance as Propaganda for Terrorists

The recent UN reports indicate that those numbers are increasing. Clearly, the U.S. and its Western allies are hesitant to admit that civilians are being caught up and victimized in these attacks, but there can be no doubt that groups like the Taliban and IS are quick to seize upon these events for their own purposes.

Air domination and the pinpoint targeting of insurgent leadership has been used specifically to place fear and uncertainty in the minds of rebel leaders, but those very same leaders will use the high civilian death rates in air attacks as evidence of the brutality of Western governments. The pain and suffering of civilian populations as a result of continued Western intervention has become an important recruiting tool for groups such as the Taliban and IS and has often become a catalyst in spreading their political views and anti-Western rhetoric.

U.S air force personnel stand by an U.S. A-10 aircraft, one of a squadron that arrived at the Kandahar air base, Afghanistan January 23, 2018.
American aircrafts have an almost unchallenged ability to unleash their lethal firepower at will. Photo: Omar Sobhani, Reuters

While smart weapon technology might be used by the U.S. to destroy insurgent leadership, the demonstration of air domination and increased civilian casualties also places a widespread sense of fear, vulnerability, and hatred of foreigners (usually Western) throughout Afghan (and other) societies.

In the end, the war in Afghanistan is sadly representative of the devastating consequences of modern wars. Although much of the killing of civilians in this war is a result of Taliban and IS operations, the U.S. and the West cannot simply walk away from this conflict and deny that foreign intervention has had anything to do with the current crisis.

The general Western ignorance of the human costs in this war which are overwhelmingly felt by Afghan civilians is clearly the result of how modern Western societies have turned the optics of modern wars into the practice of managing public relations. Sadly, for Western societies, our collective ignorance means that unleashing our lethal military power in ways that have devastating and alienating consequences in non-Western societies continues below the public radar screen. Even more sadly for the people of Afghanistan, this makes finding a solution to their plight all the more difficult.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share21Tweet
Wayne Cox

Wayne Cox

Associate Professor at the Department of Political Studies and Fellow at the Centre for International and Defence Policy at Queen's University in Kingston, Canada

Related Posts

Ukraine invasion
Opinion

Useless Gestures Abound as Ukraine, and Europe, Fall

by Stephen J. Lyons
March 9, 2022
Afghanistan
Middle East

Taliban Vows in Geneva Talks to Protect Aid Workers: NGO

by Staff Writer
February 11, 2022
Afghan women
Middle East

Afghan Women Activists Say They Feel Betrayed by Oslo Talks

by Staff Writer
January 24, 2022
Afghan women protest
Middle East

Afghan Women Protest Against Taliban Killings of Ex-Soldiers

by Staff Writer
December 28, 2021
Afghanistan drone strike
National

No US Troops to Be Punished Over Deadly Kabul Drone Strike

by Staff Writer
December 14, 2021
Afghanistan
World

World Bank Says Donors Approve Release of $280 Mn for Afghanistan

by Staff Writer
December 10, 2021
Next Post
artificial intelligence deep fake

'Deep Fake' Videos Could Change Outcome of Electoral Races

group of businesspeople having a meeting in modern office

A 38% Pay Gap Devastates Black Working Women

Please login to join discussion

Recommended

The Onion

‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens’

May 25, 2022
police line

Teen Gunman Kills 15 at Texas Elementary School

May 24, 2022
refugees

More Than 100 Million People Forcibly Displaced, UN Says

May 23, 2022
Volkswagen logo

German Farmer Sues Volkswagen Over CO2 Emissions

May 20, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Russia Says Economy Grew 3.5 Percent in First Quarter

May 18, 2022
Mexico missing people

Over 100,000 People Reported Missing in Mexico, Data Reveals

May 17, 2022

Opinion

A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Ukraine war

The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Hierarchies of Western Compassion

April 20, 2022
Chinese leader Xi Jinping

How Wrong ‘How China Can End the War in Ukraine’ Is

April 1, 2022
Ukraine children

The War for Ukraine’s Lives and Minds

March 30, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post