• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Sunday, May 22, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Inheritance Reform Could Threaten Tunisia’s Democratization Process

Fabio Merone by Fabio Merone
09/16/18
in Opinion
Tunisians take part in a protest to demand altering religious law concerning inheritance, on March 10, 2018, in the capital Tunis.

Tunisians taking part in a demonstration to demand equal inheritance rights. Photo: Fethi Belaid, AFP

27
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

During a nationally televised speech at the presidential palace of Carthage on August 13, Tunisian President Beji Caid Essebsi announced his plan to submit a draft bill to parliament to make the country’s inheritance law more equal.

This announcement follows the call for reforms of the Presidental Committee on Individual Freedom and Equality as written down in their 300-page report published last June. The committee, headed by Bochra Belhadj Ben Hamida who also co-founded Tunisia’s historical feminist organization, was established on August 13 last year, exactly one year prior to Essebsi’s announcement. The committee’s mission is to research how Tunisia’s legislative system can be made compatible with the principle of individual rights. This principle is expressed in article 21 of the 2014 constitution that was adopted in the wake of Tunisia’s Jasmine Revolution that overthrew longtime President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali.

The initiative to reform the inheritance law triggered a process of contestation headed by Noureddine El Khademi, who served as religious affair minister between December 2011 and January 2014 under the Islamist Ennahda Party-led government.

Khademi mobilized a network of religious associations and claimed that the presidential initiative is in fact against the constitution as article 1 states that “Tunisia is a free state, independent, sovereign, Islam is its religion (…),” and article 6 that “the state is the protector (ra’ya) of the religion.” Since the rule of inheritance is unambiguously stated by the Quran, “Allah instructs you concerning your children: for the male, what is equal to the share of two females “ (4:11), the proposed reform is not a matter of ijtihad (interpretative effort), Khademi argues. Thus, he reasons, the state must protect the existing law as part of its role of protector of Islam.

Initially, on a superficial level, these events may be framed as a struggle between progressive and conservative forces in society. As I will explain in this article, however, the social and political reality is much more nuanced and complex. To be able to grasp this complexity it is important to keep in mind the historical context of today’s controversy. On the one hand, there is the decades-long national debate on secularism and modernity. On the other, there is the more recent – for some quite controversial – political framework of including moderate Islamists in the process of democracy building.

Reformists versus Modernists

Since the late 19th-century, the Muslim world has been divided into two intellectual trends: reformists and modernists. The first claimed that nation-state and modernity should only be accepted by Muslims within the frame of Islam. The latter, assimilating modernity in its European/enlightenment version, thought that as in Europe, modernity should come from the secularization of society.

This debate crossed over to the 20th-century and became part of a larger political struggle in which those standing for a secular vision of the state were, in fact, the westernized elite who often allied with the authoritarian state. As such, identity politics and opposition to dictatorship came together as soon as the opposition to this nationalist/modernist project came to the forefront. Paradoxically enough, the modernist elites claimed to support human rights, while at the same time condoning repression against those who pretended to build the modern state under the guise of Islam.

Tunisia is a case in point. The modernist narrative of the country is based on the much-celebrated Code du Statut Personnel (CSP). This 1956 family code is not only the symbol of women equality but also of the authoritarian modernism of the first president, Habib Bourguiba.

It was not by chance that the current president made his speech on August 13 as this is both the commemoration of the CSP and, for this very reason, Tunisia’s women’s day. By choosing the same date and topic, Beji Caid Essebsi intended to leave his mark on the modernist history of the country.

Constitutional Compromise

That being said, the initiative to reform the inheritance law could actually threaten Tunisia’s democratization process, as the inclusion of the Islamist moderate party is another important pillar of this very process. As acknowledged by all the observers, the success (so far!) of the Tunisian “spring” was in large part due to the willingness of seculars and Islamists to make a constitutional compromise; the same compromise that seems to be threatened by this presidential initiative.

The constitutional architecture was based on a delicate balance between Islam as the symbol of the Tunisian nation and the affirmation of individual rights. The second paragraph of the preface of the constitution shows this very clearly. It states that “the attachment of our people for the teachings of Islam” is “characterized by openness and moderation, human values, and the principles of universal human rights ” and “based on the foundation of (our) Arab Islamic identity and the human civilization acquisitions(…).” (author’s personal translation from Arabic)

Women at a demonstration to mark Tunisia's Women's Day and to demand equal inheritance rights between men and women
People in the Tunisian capital chanting slogans during a demonstration to mark Tunisia’s Women’s Day and to demand equal inheritance rights between men and women. Photo: Fethi Belaid, AFP

For the leadership of Ennahda, it was possible to accept democracy because the definition of the nation-state was shaped around Islam, which also means that certain basic principles are not freely interpreted. The new constitution did in fact integrate Islam in the identity of the Tunisians but in a reformist vision. Since democratization achieved the affirmation of Islam in the constitution, the party could now accept democracy and engage in governing. If the basic tenants of the implicit constitutional deal around Islam were to be discussed again, however, Ennahda would be obliged to go back to its original role of “defender of Islam” and mobilize street politics.

Inheritance Initiative as Political Attack

From this point of view, the work of the committee that researches how Tunisia’s legislative system can be made compatible with the individual rights stated in the constitution can be considered as a political attack on the constitutional compromise with the Islamists. Even more so since the committee’s president is one of the leaders of the group of deputies that split from secular center-left Nida Tounes in 2015 when this party opted for a national unity coalition with the Islamist Ennahda. The composition of the committee did not show any attempt of compromise with Islamists either; those in the committee who are supposed to represent an Islamic point of view, like Salahddine Jorchi and Abdelmajid al-Charfi, belong in fact to the modernist trend.

In conclusion, rather than showing a case in point of a democratic Muslim country engaged on the way to civil rights, the crisis enfolded by the presidential initiative accounts better of a revival of an old anti-democratic and up-to-down method of imposing a certain vision of modernity. This procedure of reform comes in fact from a very small intellectual elite, alienated from the rest of society, that pretend imposing its modernist vision without a large societal discussion. In denying the sociological and historical evidence that Tunisia is a country rooted in its Arabo-Islamic heritage, the modernists simply perceive Islam as an obstacle to modernity that can be overcome with legislative cunning and, if needed, authoritarian tools. In this way, all the philosophical and political underpinning of the Tunisian democracy are wiped away.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share27Tweet
Fabio Merone

Fabio Merone

Post-doc assistant at the Middle East and North Africa Research Group in Ghent University, where he teaches classes on Islam, Political Islam, and contemporary politics in the Middle East. Merone was based in Tunisia from 2002 to 2015

Related Posts

Tunisia's President Kais Saied
Featured

Putting Tunisian Democracy Together Again

by Aleena Malik
February 21, 2022
migrants
Refugees

Six Migrants Drown Off Tunisia, 30 Missing

by Staff Writer
January 27, 2022
Tunisian civil protection workers
Refugees

Bodies of 20 Migrants Retrieved Off Tunisia, Ministry Says

by Staff Writer
December 24, 2020
Amazighan women with their children. Photo: Fadel Senna/AFP
World

Berbers: North Africa’s Marginalized Indigenous People

by Staff Writer
December 2, 2020
Elyes Fakhfakh resigns from Tunisia post no-confidence motion
World

Tunisia Risks Fresh Political Deadlock as PM Resigns

by Staff Writer
July 16, 2020
Sudanese protesters rally outside the army complex in Sudan’s capital Khartoum on April 18, 2019
World

Sudan Allows Alcohol Consumption, Decriminalizes Leaving Islam

by Staff Writer
July 13, 2020
Next Post
Andrei Ishchenko surrounded by supporters

Russian Opposition Cries Foul Over 'Rigged' Far East Vote

Brett Kavanaugh and Donald Trump

Trump Court Pick in Danger: Assault Accuser Vows to Testify

Recommended

Volkswagen logo

German Farmer Sues Volkswagen Over CO2 Emissions

May 20, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Russia Says Economy Grew 3.5 Percent in First Quarter

May 18, 2022
Mexico missing people

Over 100,000 People Reported Missing in Mexico, Data Reveals

May 17, 2022
Shireen Abu Akleh

Jerusalem Archbishop Condemns Israeli Police Raid at Journalist’s Funeral

May 16, 2022
A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
Israel

15 European Nations Urge Israel to Reverse Plans for More Settler Homes

May 13, 2022

Opinion

A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Ukraine war

The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Hierarchies of Western Compassion

April 20, 2022
Chinese leader Xi Jinping

How Wrong ‘How China Can End the War in Ukraine’ Is

April 1, 2022
Ukraine children

The War for Ukraine’s Lives and Minds

March 30, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post