• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Sunday, December 15, 2019
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Russia’s Pension Reform: Beginning of End of Putin’s Regime?

Alexander Titov by Alexander Titov
October 12, 2018
in Opinion
Thousands of Russians protested against the pension reform that will raise the pension age.

Thousands of Russians took to the street to protest against the pension reform. Photo: Vasily Maximov, APF

21
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

It’s hard to imagine a more unpopular reform than raising the retirement age. Think about former French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s pensions reforms in 2010 that paralyzed the country for days on end. Things are no different in Russia, where the government announced on the opening day of the World Cup in Moscow that the pension age would gradually rise by five years to 65 for men and eight years to 63 for women. Even the 5-0 victory against Saudi Arabia on that day could not diffuse the widespread opposition to the reform.

Why did the Russian government push this extremely unpopular reform then?

On most economic measures, the raising of the pension age in Russia was long overdue. As a legacy of the Soviet welfare system, the retirement age in Russia was among the lowest in the world at 55 for women and 60 for men. Common to other industrialized countries with a predominantly urban population, Russia has an aging and shrinking nation. This increases pressure on the state coffers, with an annual transfer from the budget to the pension fund of around $30 billion.

Communist Legacy

However, there are certain aspects unique to Russia that make this reform more controversial. Again, due to the legacy of the country’s communist past, there are strong paternalistic expectations towards the state among ordinary Russians. For some groups, particularly those in rural areas or small towns with high unemployment, pensions provide the only source of reliable and regular income. For many others, pensions are an important addition to their meager salaries. Increasing the living standards for those groups has been an important part of the informal social contract which has sustained President Vladimir Putin’s popularity over many years.

vladimir putin profile key dates timeline infographics
Vladimir Putin has been Russia’s president for 14 years with a break between 2008 and 2012. Image: AFP

Russia’s average life expectancy of 71 years is about ten years less than in most developed countries, with Russian men living to 67 on average. Raising the pension age to 65 would indeed mean a very short life on a pension. Although this statistic is somewhat misleading as an indicator of how long a Russian would live in the retirement (the overall average is distorted by the high number of deaths among Russian males in their middle age, while those reaching 60 actually live to 76 on average), it still resonates negatively with the vast majority of the Russians. They see an early retirement age as part of their entitlement from the state, particularly since there are virtually no functioning private pension funds.

Nevertheless, the government decided to push through this unpopular reform at speed, right after Putin’s win in the presidential elections of last March. As a result, Putin’s approval ratings fell from 79 percent in May to 67 percent in September. This was even despite his personal intervention at softening the reform, designed to present Putin as a kind “tsar” mitigating the worst excesses of his subordinates.

Putin’s proposal to set the new retirement age for women at 60 instead of 63, as well as a number of other sweeteners such as higher pensions down the line (all of which would cost the authorities extra $7.5 billion), were promptly adopted by the government. Yet, polls indicated that around 34 percent of voters said their attitudes towards Putin worsened after the intervention, as many expected him to scrap the unpopular reform altogether. This could be worrying for the authorities, as Putin’s ratings are an important indicator of the overall health of the current regime, and have been its principal legitimizing factor over the last two decades.

Protests Against Pension Reforms

To make matters worse, street protests erupted across the country. The authorities largely contained these, not at the least by splitting them into several rival movements, and thereby prevented the emergence of a single protest movement including pension protesters and the radical opposition, led by Alexei Navalny.

Alexei Navalny
Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny.

For example, in Moscow, the protest on September 2 organized by the Communist Party brought out 9,000 people, while Navalny’s organized protests a week later gathered around 2,000 people. Overall, and despite heavy-handed police treatment of the unauthorized demonstrations led by Navalny (who himself was detained), the relatively small numbers involved in the protests are unlikely to cause the Kremlin much concern.

Potentially more worrying were the results in a number of local elections where the Kremlin’s candidates were defeated. Although this was also due to various local factors and the Kremlin’s deliberate decision to let unpopular candidates lose to maintain the legitimacy of elections in Russia, it still sends a strong signal about the status of support for the ruling United Russia party.

With Putin’s approval ratings falling, losses in the local elections, and street protests taking place across Russia, the question is whether the pension reform was really worth it for the authorities.

Russia’s Economy

Apart from the general macroeconomic reasons, there are grave concerns among the Russian rulers about the sustainability of Russia’s economy under the pressure of Western sanctions and its excessive reliance on volatile oil prices. Against this background, Putin has deliberately used his high ratings at the beginning of the new presidential term to push through unpopular reforms (which in addition to the pension reform also include the raising of the VAT tax from 18 to 20 percent).

The tax and pension age raises were coupled with ambitious plans for infrastructure investment and increased spending on health and education over the next three to six years, designed to kick-start the country’s stagnating economy. Most of the extra funds will come from higher tax rather than from the oil and gas exports revenues as in the past, with the key objective to wean Russia off its oil dependency. For example, in 2019 the state budget will break even at $50 per barrel instead of $61 in 2018. Decreasing transfers from the state budget into the pension fund are designed to help with this strategy.

Putin used the window of opportunity to push through very unpopular but what seems necessary reforms. The Kremlin is hoping that by the time of Duma elections in 2021, and especially the presidential elections in 2024, these unpopular reforms will be largely forgotten.

This strategy might work. However, the public consternation over the pension reform did show that implementing unpopular policies in an authoritarian system it is not any easier than in a democracy. In fact, the stakes for the former are far higher. In a democracy, an unpopular government might lose an election. In an authoritarian system which does not allow the change of government, a mishandled reform can bring the whole system down.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share8Tweet5
Alexander Titov

Alexander Titov

Lecturer in Modern European History at the School of History, Anthropology, Philosophy and Politics of Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Related Posts

European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker arrives for a European Union summi
Opinion

EU Membership is the Only Option for the Western Balkans

by Akri Çipa
November 14, 2019
Erdogan Threatens to Open Europe Gates for Refugees
Featured

Erdogan Threatens to Open Europe Gates for Refugees

by Staff Writer
November 7, 2019
President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping during dinner at in West Palm Beach, Florida, on April 6, 2017.
Opinion

Illiberals and Anti-Liberals: Beginning of a ‘Beautiful’ Friendship?

by Zsolt Enyedi
October 25, 2019
NATO Slams Turkey Over Syria Operation, But No Punishment
Featured

NATO Slams Turkey Over Syria Operation, But No Punishment

by Staff Writer
October 24, 2019
Russia's President Vladimir Putin (right) and China's President Xi Jinping during an honor guard ceremony.
Opinion

Why Aren’t China and Russia Cooperating in the Western Balkans?

by Austin Doehler
October 10, 2019
Russia Ups Pressure on Navalny, Brands His Opposition ‘Foreign Agent’
Featured

Russia Ups Pressure on Navalny, Brands His Opposition ‘Foreign Agent’

by Staff Writer
October 9, 2019
Next Post
Syrians at a site of car bomb in Idlib

Aid Groups Worried as Deadline Looms for Syria's Idlib

Mohammed bin Salman

Saudi Arabia Faces Business Backlash Over Khashoggi Disappearance

Recommended

Afghan refugees in Greece

In Greek Migrant Camp, Women Endure Hardship and Fear

December 13, 2019
Progressive Media Icon Cenk Uygur Takes on the Democratic Establishment

Progressive Media Icon Cenk Uygur Takes on the Democratic Establishment

December 13, 2019
Boris Johnson addresses the final Conservative Party leadership election hustings in London on 17 July 2019

Johnson Wins Big in ‘Brexit Election’ But Problems Loom

December 13, 2019
Chile President Lifts State Of Emergency, But Protests Continue

UN Condemns ‘Repressive’ Response to Chile Mass Protests

December 13, 2019
Boris Johnson

Despite Triumphant Election Win, Johnson Faces Battle for Britain

December 13, 2019
People in South Sudan

‘Catastrophic’ Floods Could Provoke Famine in S.Sudan: WFP

December 12, 2019

Opinion

Boris Johnson addresses the final Conservative Party leadership election hustings in London on 17 July 2019

Johnson Wins Big in ‘Brexit Election’ But Problems Loom

December 13, 2019
Nayib Bukele, celebrating with his wife, was declared the winner of El Salvador's presidential election

How Bukele Impressed in His First Six Months as President of El Salvador

December 12, 2019
Traders work after the closing bell at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on August 7, 2019 on Wall Street in New York City.

The Financialization of the US Economy Should Terrify All Americans

December 11, 2019
US President Donald Trump pauses while speaking about infrastructure at the Cameron LNG Export Facility on May 14, 2019

Why It Is Time for Trump to Forge a New Iran Deal

December 9, 2019
US President Donald Trump

Climate Won’t Be Only Winner if Trump Repledges to Paris Agreement

December 5, 2019
Police fires tear gas at protestors in Hong Kong.

Protests in Hong Kong: Media’s Portrayal Versus Firsthand Experience

December 4, 2019
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post