• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Saturday, May 21, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Trump’s Khashoggi Statement: the Bad, the Worse, and the Unanticipated

Sahar Khamis by Sahar Khamis
11/26/18
in Opinion
US President Donald Trump, right, shakes hands with Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the White House on March 20, 2018.

US President Donald Trump shakes hands with Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Photo: Mandel Ngan, AFP

23
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

With 633 words and no less than 8 exclamation marks, President Donald J. Trump’s statement on the killing of Saudi dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi triggered a set of fierce reactions, ranging from astonishment to disagreement, disappointment, and even disdain. While much could be said about the bad and the worse within this statement, it had an unanticipated positive outcome too.

In his much-discussed statement, Trump evaded and dodged the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman’s responsibility for the brutal murder by indicating that “maybe he did and maybe he didn’t!” Many saw this reaction as very weak and disappointing, especially after a CIA report concluded with a “high degree of confidence” that it was the crown prince himself who ordered the killing.

Trump insisted that King Salman and the Saudi crown prince “vigorously deny any knowledge of the planning or execution of the murder of Mr. Khashoggi” and that the CIA didn’t reach any decisive conclusion on this matter, rather, it simply had “feelings” about it. This led many to contend that Trump was “giving Saudi Arabia a pass.”

The Bad: Contradicting the CIA and Compromising Moral Leadership

The clear contradiction between Trump’s position and the CIA’s report is the first worrying element of the statement. This led a number of senior Democrats in Congress, such as California Senator and Chair of the House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff, to conclude that the president was being “dishonest” about the matter.

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at their meeting at Helsinki on July 16, 2018
Presidents Trump and Putin shake hands at their meeting in Helsinki. Photo: AFP

It is alarming that the president attempts to, again, believe an authoritarian and undemocratic foreign power over his own intelligence, just like he did with Russia before. During the highly controversial Helsinki Summit, Trump’s answer to a question about Russian interference in the 2016 elections was that President Vladimir Putin assured him many times that “he didn’t do it.” Trump expressed his doubts about Russia’s meddling, despite assurances and evidence from the American intelligence community confirming this meddling and its continuation.

This contradiction with his own intelligence doesn’t only weaken the credibility and believability of American intelligence, it, most importantly, weakens the credibility of the United States in the eyes of the international community. It also shakes the U.S. position of moral authority, as it is perceived to be bowing down to dictators, at the expense of the truth.

This is a slap in the face to the American intelligence officers who work daily to protect our country.

And it’s yet another fawning prostration to a foreign authoritarian. It’s only a matter of time until actions like this by the President directly threaten our security. https://t.co/raUfhTh96q

— Tim Kaine (@timkaine) November 20, 2018

By compromising America’s moral leadership as the sole superpower in today’s modern world, the leader of the free world, the beacon of democracy, and the protector of human rights, Trump not only diminishes the status of his own country, he also emboldens brutal dictators and enables ruthless autocrats.

When the leader of “the home of the free and the land of the brave” fails to take a strong position on such a horrific violation of human rights, which goes against every moral doctrine and each human rights accord, he sends a message to these dictators that they can get away with any crime, no matter how gruesome it may be, as long as they can strike the right deal with him.

The newly elected first American-Muslim Congresswoman Ilhan Omar stated her strong objection to this weak position on the part of President Trump by tweeting “Once again, our President proves that you can’t buy a moral compass. And Saudi Arabia proves that you can, on the other hand, buy a President.”

The Worse: Petrodollars over American Values and Inaccuracies

This tweet draws attention to what is worse about Trump’s statement: Putting Saudi petrodollars above American values, by adopting a policy which prioritizes oil, trade, and arms sales over America’s best interest and its moral standing.

Contrary to Trump’s famous slogan “America First,” such a weak foreign policy is most likely to put “Saudi Arabia First,” by creating the myth that America has no leverage when it comes to financial dealings with Saudi Arabia, whether regarding buying oil or selling arms.

President Trump contributed to this fallacy by infusing his statement with inaccuracies, including the exact amount of financial dealings with Saudi Arabia. Trump indicated that “the Kingdom agreed to spend and invest $450 billion in the United States,” while the correct figure is estimated to be much smaller.

US President Donald Trump (R) holds a defense sales chart with Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in the Oval Office of the White House on March 20, 2018 in Washington, DC
Trump holding up a defense sales chart with bin Salman in March. Photo: Mandel Ngan, AFP

His claim that if the Saudis do not buy arms from the United States they will turn to Russia and China instead is equally untrue, since Russian and Chinese weapons are behind American weapons, in terms of their capabilities and novelty. This means that the Saudis will certainly continue to need American weapons, even if the American president takes a firm moral stand on Khashoggi’s murder and whoever is behind it.

If that’s the case, the next logical question is “So, why didn’t he do that?!” There are two possible explanations here, one is economic and the other is political.

The first explanation is that it is not about “America First” or “Saudi Arabia First.” Rather, it is about “Trump First.” The proponents of this position refer to Trump’s personal business dealings with the Saudis over many years. Trump often bragged about this when he was running as a presidential candidate but vehemently denies it now.

They also refer to the business dealings between the Saudis and Jared Kushner, Trump’s senior adviser and son-in-law, especially taking into account Kushner’s close relationship with the Saudi crown prince.

This, of course, brings a completely different perspective on the whole issue. Instead of the patriotic leader who is putting his country “First” and is trying to “Make America Great Again,” Trump can now be viewed as a self-interested and nepotistic businessman, who has little regard for what is best for his own nation and its international image. This clearly invites the question of “conflict of interest” on the part of the president and his family members.

The second explanation is that it is not just about money, rather, there is also a political aspect. This involves geostrategic interests, something that shouldn’t be neglected or overlooked. Trump expressed this in this statement when he highlighted and prioritized the role of Saudi Arabia in providing a strong line of defense against Iran.

Donald Trump speaks at a rally organized by the Tea Party Patriots against the Iran nuclear deal
Trump called the nuclear deal with Iran the ‘the worst deal ever.’ Photo: Nicholas Kamm, AFP

He described Saudi Arabia as “a great ally in our very important fight against Iran,” and indicated that “the United States intends to remain a steadfast partner of Saudi Arabia to ensure the interests of our country, Israel and all other partners in the region.” It is no secret that Trump, who always defined himself by his anti-Obama policies from day one, has been very critical of Obama’s Iran nuclear deal, and, therefore, unilaterally withdrew out of this deal.

By adopting a hawkish and antagonistic position against Iran, which is intended to appeal to the right-wing, pro-Israel lobby in the U.S., Trump desperately needs the support of Saudi Arabia, as a strategic power in the Gulf region and a major geopolitical ally in the Middle East, to counterbalance Iran in case of any future military confrontation.

The Unanticipated: Democrats and Republicans Unite

Despite the previously mentioned criticisms of Trump’s statement and their negative consequences, one unanticipated positive outcome emerged: the agreement between Democrats and Republicans, despite their ideological differences, which became especially more evident since the beginning of Trump’s presidency.

In this particular case, many policymakers across the aisle were united in their position on this issue and in expressing their objection to Trump’s statement on Khashoggi, which some Republican Senators described as “so weak,” urging “a tougher stance on Saudi Arabia.” Many bipartisan voices called for a transparent and independent investigation to reveal all the facts surrounding this brutal murder.

The Democratic majority House of Representatives that will take over in January 2019 as a result of the midterm elections makes this last point especially important. The newly formed House is expected to more serious play the watchdog role over the president, thus, upholding the principle of “checks and balances” in U.S. politics and ensuring maximum accountability on the part of the highest office in the land.

Giving Ruthless Dictatorial Regimes a Pass

How far and how much all of these factors will change President Trump’s foreign policy, his handling of international affairs, his policy towards Saudi Arabia, and his position on the “Khashoggi Affair” remains to be seen.

What we have clearly seen, however, is a weak reaction to a horrific murder, which not only harms the U.S. image worldwide, shakes its status, and threatens its moral leadership, it also gives a pass to ruthless dictatorial regimes.

This sends a chilling message to many of these regimes’ opponents and exiled critics. What Trump could, and should, have done was issuing a firm statement, not only strongly condemning the horrible act but also siding with his own intelligence in strongly condemning those behind it. This wouldn’t weaken America’s interests. Rather, it would put them “First!”

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share23Tweet
Sahar Khamis

Sahar Khamis

Associate Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Maryland. She is an expert on Arab and Muslim media, interfaith activist, public speaker, and radio host. Contact her @skhamis

Related Posts

US Capitol riot
National

Trump ‘More Likely Than Not’ Obstructed Congress: US Judge

by Staff Writer
March 28, 2022
Mohammed bin Salman
Democracy at Risk

HRW Labels Saudi Mass Execution ‘Brutal Show of Autocratic Rule’

by Staff Writer
March 15, 2022
Justin Bieber
Lifestyle

‘Weaponizing Bieber’ – Canadian Pop Star Caught Up in Saudi Rights Row

by Staff Writer
December 1, 2021
A noose is seen on makeshift gallows as supporters of US President Donald Trump gather on the West side of the US Capitol in Washington DC on January 6, 2021
Opinion

How Praise and Blame Rhetoric Are Poisoning American Democracy

by Ryan Skinnell
November 2, 2021
Ali al-Nimr
Democracy at Risk

Saudi Releases Shiite Ex-Death Row Prisoner Al-Nimr: Rights Group

by Staff Writer
October 27, 2021
Pro-abortion rights activists rally at the Texas State Capitol in Austin against SB8, September 11.
Featured

The Horrors of a Repressive Regime, American Style

by Stephen J. Lyons
October 26, 2021
Next Post
hillary clinton

Clinton, Refugees and Neo-Nazis

US Senate to Vote on Yemen War as Near-Apocalyptic Disaster There Looms

US Senate to Vote on Yemen War as Near-Apocalyptic Disaster There Looms

Recommended

Volkswagen logo

German Farmer Sues Volkswagen Over CO2 Emissions

May 20, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Russia Says Economy Grew 3.5 Percent in First Quarter

May 18, 2022
Mexico missing people

Over 100,000 People Reported Missing in Mexico, Data Reveals

May 17, 2022
Shireen Abu Akleh

Jerusalem Archbishop Condemns Israeli Police Raid at Journalist’s Funeral

May 16, 2022
A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
Israel

15 European Nations Urge Israel to Reverse Plans for More Settler Homes

May 13, 2022

Opinion

A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Ukraine war

The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Hierarchies of Western Compassion

April 20, 2022
Chinese leader Xi Jinping

How Wrong ‘How China Can End the War in Ukraine’ Is

April 1, 2022
Ukraine children

The War for Ukraine’s Lives and Minds

March 30, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post