• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Friday, July 1, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

The Bigger Underlying Issues of the US-China Trade War May be Insoluble

Amitrajeet A. Batabyal by Amitrajeet A. Batabyal
07/23/19
in Opinion
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping

Donald Trump and Xi Jinping. Photo: Nicolas Asfouri/AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The U.S.-China trade war has now dragged on for over a year, and little suggests there will be a resolution anytime soon. The main problem is that even though the “war,” from a U.S. perspective, is manifestly about trade imbalances and practices, there are deeper issues at work that are unlikely to be resolved even if there is a deal on the trade aspect of the underlying problems.

To see why not, it is essential to comprehend two lessons: one from history and one from economics.

Enforceable Measures

First, the history lesson. A central sticking point in the current round of trade talks concerns enforcement. The U.S. rightly believes that Beijing has repeatedly reneged on its prior commitments about international trade and hence any deal that emerges from these talks must be enforceable.

U.S. negotiators have thus far discussed two views of enforcement. According to the first view, the U.S. has the right to act unilaterally against Beijing with no retaliation possible by Beijing if China fails to follow through with its contractual commitments. In this regard, action by the U.S. might involve the unilateral imposition of tariffs on Chinese exports with no possibility for the legal implementation of retaliatory tariffs by Beijing.

A second and complementary way to obtain enforcement would be for the agreements that China makes in its trade deals with the U.S. to be codified in Chinese law.

Beijing has yet to agree to either of these two mechanisms, and that is in large part why the two countries find themselves at an impasse.

China’s ‘Century of Humiliation’

This reluctance by Beijing has a lot to do with the history of Chinese interactions with the West in the 19th century. In particular, the First Opium War between the British and China, which began in 1839, ended rather unfavorably for the Qing dynasty with the 1942 Treaty of Nanking.

In this treaty with Britain (and in subsequent treaties with the U.S., Russia, and France), the Chinese were compelled to accept detrimental terms and, more generally, forced to accept Western diplomatic norms. This resulted not only in the eventual 1912 downfall of the Qing dynasty but also to the heightened status of the much-discussed “century of humiliation” that most schoolchildren and educated people in China know about.

Mao Zedong dreamed of transforming China into a communist paradise
Mao Zedong dreamed of transforming China into a communist paradise. Photo: AFP

In fact, the Chinese Communist Party rose to power under Mao Zedong in 1949, in part predicated on a promise to end humiliation at the hands of foreigners. In this regard, memories of the “century of humiliation” appear to still be fresh in at least some quarters of the present Chinese Communist Party. Therefore, it is not surprising that President Xi Jinping and his trade negotiators are loath to agree to U.S. terms that might be seen as one-sided or injurious to China.

The only problem with this now rather self-serving narrative is that a lot has changed in the last 150 years. Instead of being bullied by foreigners, one can credibly claim that in its lending practices to weaker nations, China is doing the bullying. That said, as the second-largest economy in the world, China needs to understand that the rules-based system of international trade has generated wealth for many in the world, including Chinese citizens.

Grievances Against China

This brings us to the economics lesson. The U.S., and the West more generally, have many legitimate grievances against China. For instance, the theft of intellectual property from and the forced transfer of technology by U.S. firms benefits China but generates losses for American firms.

To give a second example, the Chinese move towards self-sufficiency in key technologies is inconsistent with international trade based on the principle of comparative advantage.

When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win. Example, when we are down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore-we win big. It’s easy!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 2, 2018

In sum, the U.S. wants China to abandon its model of state-sponsored capitalism with subsidies for local winners, eliminate limits on market access to U.S. firms, preclude the forced transfer of technology, prevent the theft of intellectual property, and get rid of politicized regulation.

In this acrimonious situation, two fundamentally different economic systems are in competition with each other across a whole host of fields. From Beijing’s perspective, the very aspects of its economic model that the U.S. would like it to change are responsible for its tremendous growth of the last three decades. So, why should it change anything? To use an American adage, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” From a Chinese perspective, their model certainly “ain’t broke,” and hence there is nothing to fix.

Broken System

This combination of history and economics lessons reveals that even if a trade deal is reached between the U.S. and China, the fundamental underlying issues are unlikely to be resolved.

The only hope of settling these deeper issues lies in the U.S. engaging in robust, multilateral diplomacy with its western allies. The aim should be to present Beijing with a joint and powerful demand to fix what is, in effect, a broken system when looked at from the perspective of the rest of the world.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
ShareTweet
Amitrajeet A. Batabyal

Amitrajeet A. Batabyal

Arthur J. Gosnell Professor of Economics at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Batabyal has published over 600 papers, books, book chapters, and book reviews

Related Posts

US President Donald Trump
Opinion

Owning the Words and the Libs

by Stephen J. Lyons
June 16, 2022
Officers in Uvalde, Texas, stand outside Robb Elementary School near a makeshift memorial for the shooting victims
Opinion

Child Sacrifice Makes a Comeback

by Stephen J. Lyons
June 3, 2022
A man holding a gun
Featured

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

by Stephen J. Lyons
May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs
Opinion

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

by Jianli Yang
April 23, 2022
Chinese leader Xi Jinping
Opinion

How Wrong ‘How China Can End the War in Ukraine’ Is

by Yan Yu and Jianli Yang
April 1, 2022
US Capitol riot
National

Trump ‘More Likely Than Not’ Obstructed Congress: US Judge

by Staff Writer
March 28, 2022
Next Post
Palestinian demonstrators throw stones at Israeli security forces during protests along the border with Israel in the Gaza Strip on July 12, 2019

A Nasty, Brutish Dream: Palestinian Youth in Detainment

Boris Johnson

Everything You Need to Know About the UK's Controversial New Prime Minister

Recommended

Mexico murdered journalists

Journalist Murdered in Mexico, 12th This Year

June 29, 2022
Spain migrants

Spain Prosecutor Opens Probe Into Melilla Migrant Deaths

June 28, 2022
Afghan refugees

Pakistani Migrants in Afghanistan Caught in Quake No-Man’s Land

June 27, 2022
Joe Biden climate summit

Biden Calls Clean Energy Matter of National Security in Face of Russia War

June 17, 2022
climate change

Developing Countries Left ‘Disappointed’ at Climate Talks

June 16, 2022
US President Donald Trump

Owning the Words and the Libs

June 16, 2022

Opinion

US President Donald Trump

Owning the Words and the Libs

June 16, 2022
Officers in Uvalde, Texas, stand outside Robb Elementary School near a makeshift memorial for the shooting victims

Child Sacrifice Makes a Comeback

June 3, 2022
A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Ukraine war

The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Hierarchies of Western Compassion

April 20, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post