• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Monday, July 4, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Disinherited and Disempowered, Kashmiris Have No Option but to Resist

Mohamad Junaid by Mohamad Junaid
08/12/19
in Opinion
Women in Kashmir holding up a sign protesting the scrapping of Article 370

In his first comments on the constitutional bombshell announced while Kashmir was under a military lockdown, Modi highlighted security as one of the top reasons for the "historic decision." Photo: Money Sharma, AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Kashmir is staring at a monumental geopolitical uncertainty. Last week, India, which administers two-thirds of the region, unilaterally tore apart historic agreements and bifurcated the territory, leaving Kashmiris shocked and outraged.

In fact, most Kashmiris have not even been given a chance to know yet what has befallen them as the entire region is currently under military siege and total information blockade. Even five days after the Indian parliament decided to revise Article 370 and revoke Article 35A, the two key constitutional provisions that formed the historical-legal link between Kashmir and India, close to 10 million people of Kashmir remain totally cut off from the world.

India’s actions, under the stewardship of its Hindu-rightwing BJP government, have brought South Asia squarely back to the traumatic events of 1947, when a bloody partition created India and Pakistan and handed Kashmiris the misfortune of being divided and fought over by these two states.

Kashmiris would perhaps have celebrated if the revocation of Article 370 had been part of the process that led to the independence of their homeland, but that is not what has transpired. In fact, Kashmiris will see India’s moves as a direct assault on their existence as a people and, as many Kashmiris have long feared, the beginnings of a settler-colonial project.

These fears aren’t unfounded.

Creation of Kashmir

In 1947, when the British left the subcontinent, the Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir, as it was known, became independent. It had an unpopular Hindu monarchy ruling over a mostly Muslim population. Forced to decide between a Muslim-majority Pakistan and a Hindu-majority India, the Hindu ruler chose India without seeking the consent of his subjects. Nevertheless, Kashmir’s accession to India was limited to matters of defense, external affairs, and communication. Soon war over the region broke out between India and Pakistan, and the U.N. Security Council called for a ceasefire and a referendum in Jammu and Kashmir to determine its final status.

At that time and even now, most Kashmiris would have preferred to stay independent, but a small class of Kashmiri politicians endorsed the Hindu ruler’s decision after seeking guarantees from Indian leaders that Kashmir would have autonomy within the Indian Union and India would preserve the demographic character of the state.

Today the people of Jammu & Kashmir who reposed their faith in institutions of India like parliament & Supreme Court feel defeated & betrayed. By dismembering the state & fraudulently taking away what is rightfully & legally ours, they have further complicated the Kashmir dispute

— Mehbooba Mufti (@MehboobaMufti) August 5, 2019

Article 370 enshrined Kashmir’s autonomy, allowing the state to have its own constitution, flag, prime minister, and president. Indian laws could not be applied in Kashmir without the approval of Kashmir’s elected State Assembly. Article 35A enshrined the promise of not allowing Indians to settle in the region permanently.

The only way these articles could be amended – if the procedure had been followed – was by seeking a majority approval of the Jammu and Kashmir State Assembly. Again, that did not happen. The State Assembly was arbitrarily dissolved last November, and an Indian governor effectively controls the entire administration.

Kashmir’s Autonomy

For the last 70 years, the Indian government has found one way or the other to turn Kashmir’s autonomy into an empty shell. Kashmir was never really protected from the Indian state’s depredations. It has been the most-directly intervened in states of India. Its elections have often been systematically rigged, and its governments have been whimsically removed. It has had the longest spells of direct-rule from New Delhi.

And the Indian military in the region has enjoyed total immunity from prosecution for human rights abuses; a privilege Indian forces have used to the hilt. Even then, Article 370 had come to symbolize a distinct identity for Kashmiris, a hook to their long continuous history as a people, and a hope for a future of independence and self-government. The unilateral revision of Article 370 effectively dissolves any legal basis of Kashmir’s accession to India and turns Kashmir into a forcibly annexed land without the consent of its population.

Indian security forces patrolling Tral town in South Kashmir
Indian security forces patrolling Tral town in South Kashmir. Photo: Raqib Hameed Naik

The dissolution of Article 35A represents an even graver danger. The article was enacted as a continuation of a pre-1947 state law in Kashmir that granted Kashmir’s permanent residents citizenship rights, including buying land and applying for government jobs. After 1947, only the State Assembly could determine who the permanent residents of Kashmir were.

Demographic ‘Solution’

Hindu nationalists in India, however, have long campaigned to have the law removed so that the path to permanently settle Indians in Kashmir could be cleared. The Hindu-right in India, which include the BJP and its parent paramilitary organization RSS, has openly stated that Kashmir’s Muslim majority represents a “problem” and has proposed that opening up Kashmir to Hindu settlers from India would permanently put an end to the Kashmiri demands for independence.

Hindu-right’s drastic demographic “solution,” inspired in equal measure from their admiration of Nazi-era Germany and Israeli policies in Occupied Palestine, gained popularity in India in the 1990s when India’s government increased military repression in Kashmir and Kashmiris rose to demand freedom from India.

Since 1990, Kashmiris have lived under an unremitting military occupation. More than 80,000 Kashmiris have been killed, mostly at the hands of Indian forces, while thousands remain in jail. A large percentage of the population is maimed or suffers from mental ailments directly attributable to military repression.

Kashmir’s Muslim Majority

When India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a lifelong member of the RSS, came to power in 2014, the Hindu-right saw it as their opportunity to put their plans for Kashmir into practice. On prime-time TV news shows, extremist Indian nationalists stoked a moral frenzy around Articles 370 and 35A. These laws, they claimed, unfairly gave Kashmir a “special status.” Within India’s constitution, there are several other regions which have had similar protections, but those protections have not been touched.

India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi
India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Photo: AFP

It was clear that Kashmir’s position was being targeted because of its Muslim majority population. BJP typically blamed opposition parties for preventing Modi from dissolving Kashmir’s autonomy. Kashmir should be like just any other state, the Hindu-right demanded.

However, the decision to revoke Article 370 and 35A came with an additional move that bifurcated the state and demoted it into two “Union Territories,” a status lower than normal Indian states. Union territories are directly ruled from Delhi, which would allow India crucial powers over policing and land use in Kashmir.

No Other Option

For close to two centuries, three principle regions have constituted the state: Kashmir, Jammu, and Ladakh. This arrangement has had internal frictions, but it allowed a degree of ethnoreligious pluralism in the state. With the bifurcation, this fragile balance has been drastically disturbed. Now the sparsely-populated Ladakh, where Buddhists have a slender majority over Muslims, will be one union territory. Jammu and Kashmir will be another union territory. The people in these regions will have minimal to no say in how they should be governed.

In my decade of research on Kashmir’s political history and society, I have never come across a single voice in the region that supported the removal of these laws. Not even among the few who would have preferred to stay as part of the Indian state. An overwhelming majority of Kashmiris believes that staying under Indian rule would be to live under a perpetual threat of ethnic cleansing. That is why most would want to become independent.

Kashmir’s 70-year story under India has been one of political disempowerment, denial of democratic rights, and outright brutalization. Now Kashmiris stare at the very real possibility of dispossession and disinheritance. As more Kashmiris are beginning to understand what has taken place, their anger is growing. India has pushed them into yet another maelstrom of an unending resistance. They are being left with no other option.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
ShareTweet
Mohamad Junaid

Mohamad Junaid

Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the Massachusetts College at Liberal Arts

Related Posts

Afghan refugees
Featured

Pakistani Migrants in Afghanistan Caught in Quake No-Man’s Land

by Staff Writer
June 27, 2022
India hijab ban
World

Protests Over Classroom Hijab Ban Grow in India

by Staff Writer
February 7, 2022
Climate Crisis Triggers Spike in Lightning Strike Deaths in India
Environment

Climate Crisis Triggers Spike in Lightning Strike Deaths in India

by Staff Writer
September 3, 2021
Taj Mahal
Lifestyle

Taj Mahal Reopens as India Eases Pandemic Restrictions

by Staff Writer
June 16, 2021
Covid-19 in Brazil
Featured

No Pandemic End in Sight With Raging Outbreaks in India, Brazil

by Staff Writer
May 1, 2021
President Joe Biden
National

Biden Warns Taliban, Presses Pakistan as He Announces Afghan Exit

by Staff Writer
April 14, 2021
Next Post
The Al-Noor Mosque in Norway, where a white supremacist terrorist opened fired but was wrestled to the grown by worshipers, preventing anyone from being killed.

Norway Mosque Terror Attack Suspect Appears in Court

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson

People of Northern Ireland May Pay High Price for Johnson's Political Negligence

Recommended

Shireen Abu Akleh

US Says Al Jazeera Journalist Likely Shot by Israel But Not Intentionally

July 4, 2022
Google logo

Google to Pay $90 Mn in Settlement With App Developers

July 1, 2022
Mexico murdered journalists

Journalist Murdered in Mexico, 12th This Year

June 29, 2022
Spain migrants

Spain Prosecutor Opens Probe Into Melilla Migrant Deaths

June 28, 2022
Afghan refugees

Pakistani Migrants in Afghanistan Caught in Quake No-Man’s Land

June 27, 2022
Joe Biden climate summit

Biden Calls Clean Energy Matter of National Security in Face of Russia War

June 17, 2022

Opinion

US President Donald Trump

Owning the Words and the Libs

June 16, 2022
Officers in Uvalde, Texas, stand outside Robb Elementary School near a makeshift memorial for the shooting victims

Child Sacrifice Makes a Comeback

June 3, 2022
A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Ukraine war

The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Hierarchies of Western Compassion

April 20, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post