• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Friday, May 20, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Featured

EU States Launch Process Disputing Iran’s Nuclear Compliance

Staff Writer by Staff Writer
01/14/20
in Featured, World
The EU's foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.

The EU's foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif. Photo: AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Three E.U. countries on Tuesday launched a process charging Iran with failing to observe the terms of the 2015 deal curtailing its nuclear program, a move that sparked anger and threats from Tehran at a time of intensifying tensions.

Britain, France, and Germany insisted they remained committed to the agreement, which has already been severely tested by the U.S. exit from the accord in 2018.

But even as their statement was released, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson indicated he might prefer a new accord negotiated with U.S. President Donald Trump instead of the 2015 deal.

The decision to begin the so-called dispute mechanism process comes as tensions soar between the West and Iran following the killing of top commander Qasem Soleimani in a U.S. strike, and the admission by Tehran days later that it had accidentally shot down a Ukrainian airliner.

Iran had been progressively scaling back its commitments under the deal since May last year in an effort to pressure Europe for greater relief from U.S. sanctions.

Before then, experts agree Iran was in full compliance with the terms of the deal, even after Trump withdrew the U.S. from it and reimposed crippling sanctions on the country.

“We have therefore been left with no choice, given Iran’s actions,” to begin the dispute process, The foreign ministers of the three European nations statement said.

‘Accept the Consequences’ 

The 2015 nuclear deal signed in Vienna – known as The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – has a provision that allows a party to claim significant non-compliance by another party before a joint commission.

If the issue is not resolved by the commission, it then goes to an advisory board and eventually to the U.N. Security Council, which could reimpose U.N. sanctions.

The first meeting of the process – set to include the European nations, Iran and the other parties to the deal, China and Russia – would take place in Austria by the end of the month, a diplomatic source told AFP in Vienna.

/THREAD/ Very dangerous step by the E3 to trigger #IranDeal's Dispute Resolution Mechanism (DRM). If it leads to the snapping back of UN sanctions, it will not only ensure the death of the JCPOA, it may also prompt Iran to leave the NPT altogether.

That would be a disaster.
>>

— Trita Parsi (@tparsi) January 14, 2020

Iran had intensified sensitive activities to enrich uranium, which can be used to make a nuclear weapon, in response to Trump’s pulling out of the deal.

The Islamic Republic, however, has no nuclear weapons programs and insists it is not pursuing a bomb. It has not enriched nuclear material to the levels required to build a weapon and continues to allow international inspections of its nuclear energy facilities.

But its latest step in January to forgo the limit on the number of centrifuges used in uranium enrichment prompted the Europeans to trigger the mechanism.

Tehran lashed out at the European countries and appeared to threatened unspecified retaliation.

“Of course, if the Europeans … seek to abuse (this process), they must also be prepared to accept the consequences,” the foreign ministry said in a statement.

‘Back to Full Compliance’ 

But the three powers said they “once again express our commitment” to the deal and expressed “determination to work with all participants to preserve it.”

“Our hope is to bring Iran back into full compliance with its commitments under the JCPOA,” they said.

The accord aimed to restrict Iran’s nuclear activities in return for sanctions relief.

The three countries said they would not join “a campaign to implement maximum pressure against Iran” championed by U.S. Trump.

But Johnson said he would be willing to work on a “Trump deal” to replace the JCPOA, which was negotiated by the administration of former President Barack Obama.

“That’s what we need to see. I think that would be a great way forward,” Johnson said, noting that “from the American perspective it (the 2015 deal) is a flawed agreement.”

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab denied that Johnson’s remarks represented a shift, saying London backed the nuclear deal while also wanting a wider deal that would go beyond the nuclear issue to cover all contentious issues.

‘Resume Diplomatic Effort’ 

The E.U.’s diplomatic chief Josep Borrell said it was “more important than ever” to save the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal “in light of the ongoing dangerous escalations in the Middle East.”

He emphasized that the aim of the dispute mechanism was not to reimpose sanctions.

Tensions between Iran and the United States last week climbed to their highest levels since the hostage crisis at the U.S. embassy in Tehran that followed the 1979 Islamic Revolution that ousted the American-backed dictator Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

By invoking @theIrandeal dispute resolution mechanism, #Europe is warning #Iran not to go farther out of the deal. An effort to buy more time for diplomacy.

— Barbara Slavin (@barbaraslavin1) January 14, 2020

Iran has vowed retribution over the United States’ killing of Soleimani in a drone strike in Baghdad.

And while Iran’s attack on Iraqi bases housing U.S. troops was seen as a relatively measured retaliation, Iranian forces mistakenly shot down over a Tehran a Ukrainian plane killing all 176 passengers and crew on board.

Analysts said launching the deal’s dispute resolution mechanism gave Europe the advantage of taking control of the process, but warned that the move could also backfire.

Ellie Geranmayeh, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told AFP that the triggering of the process “set in motion a new phase.”

The greatest risk now was that Iran could respond to this “pressure tactic” by speeding up its nuclear program or even leaving the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which would be a “major turning point,” Geranmayeh said.


More on the Subject 

 

ShareTweet
Staff Writer

Staff Writer

AFP with The Globe Post

Related Posts

Iranian flag
Democracy at Risk

HRW Urges Iran to Release Teachers Arrested in Crackdown

by Staff Writer
May 6, 2022
Morad Tahbaz
Middle East

Environmentalist Held in Iran Ends ‘Hunger Strike’: Daughter

by Staff Writer
March 29, 2022
US Capitol riot
National

Trump ‘More Likely Than Not’ Obstructed Congress: US Judge

by Staff Writer
March 28, 2022
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Ali Bagheri
Middle East

Iran: Nuclear Deal ‘Within Reach’ If West Shows Goodwill, Ball in US Court

by Staff Writer
December 2, 2021
A noose is seen on makeshift gallows as supporters of US President Donald Trump gather on the West side of the US Capitol in Washington DC on January 6, 2021
Opinion

How Praise and Blame Rhetoric Are Poisoning American Democracy

by Ryan Skinnell
November 2, 2021
Pen America Gala 2021
Democracy at Risk

PEN America Honors Imprisoned Iranian Writers at 2021 Gala

by Staff Writer
October 6, 2021
Next Post
Rojava, Lost? Turkish Offensive Threatens to Destroy a Radical Democratic Experiment

Syria Kurds Warn of Regime Pressure, Aid Shortages After UN Vote

United States Donald Trump

Trump Trial Looms as House to Send Charges to Senate on Wednesday

Recommended

Volkswagen logo

German Farmer Sues Volkswagen Over CO2 Emissions

May 20, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Russia Says Economy Grew 3.5 Percent in First Quarter

May 18, 2022
Mexico missing people

Over 100,000 People Reported Missing in Mexico, Data Reveals

May 17, 2022
Shireen Abu Akleh

Jerusalem Archbishop Condemns Israeli Police Raid at Journalist’s Funeral

May 16, 2022
A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
Israel

15 European Nations Urge Israel to Reverse Plans for More Settler Homes

May 13, 2022

Opinion

A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Ukraine war

The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Hierarchies of Western Compassion

April 20, 2022
Chinese leader Xi Jinping

How Wrong ‘How China Can End the War in Ukraine’ Is

April 1, 2022
Ukraine children

The War for Ukraine’s Lives and Minds

March 30, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post