• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Wednesday, February 8, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Institutional Shareholders Must Stand Up to Corporate Political Spending

Frederick Alexander by Frederick Alexander
01/16/20
in Opinion
US dollar bills

Corporate money has deregulated the finance industry, distorted government capacity to address climate change, and limited the very competition that makes the free market an essential tool for price discovery and resource allocation. Photo: AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In corporate America, shareholders should be equipped with the tools to limit corporate political spending. This is essential for creating a just and prosperous economy.

Many shareholders live in a progressive bubble where Elizabeth Warren is celebrated, although perhaps taken more seriously than literally, and the term “neoliberal” is an epithet applied to anyone who objects to the government intervention anticipated by her platform.

In another bubble, such skepticism is championed as “free-market conservatism.” But these bubbles are closer than their inhabitants imagine, as demonstrated by Warren’s embrace of the label “capitalist” and by the reaction of progressives to the new isolationism.

Free Marketers versus Progressives 

Serious policy arguments about where we can turn to address fundamental concerns like growing inequality, ecological risk, and human rights continue to involve adjusting the dials on the “Washington consensus” that has governed policy circles and international organizations for decades.

This consensus takes economic ideas like gains from trade, comparative advantage, and the reality of transaction costs and turns them into policy prescriptions, including the policies that underlie the markets we use.

For too long, politicians have taken money from special interests & worked for them in Washington instead of the people they represent.

I’m pledging to take action to end the influence of special interests – which starts with my Reform Agenda. #mepolitics https://t.co/jCLGByB6wb

— Sara Gideon (@SaraGideon) January 15, 2020

The difference, which I do not mean to understate, involves emphasis. While free marketers may emphasize gains from trade and thus increased property rights, the progressive crowd will focus on the need for the regulation where collective action is the least costly route to an efficient outcome.

But serious conservatives do not believe that pollution should be unregulated and serious progressives do not believe all industries should be nationalized – there is much common ground. Corporate political spending salts this common ground.

Maximizing Profit

Take economist Milton Friedman’s famous 1970 article proclaiming that corporations’ only responsibility is to make money: progressives cast it as the epitome of greed-centered neoliberalism, while free marketers view it as a touchstone of common sense. This is what he actually said:

“In a free-enterprise, private-property system, a corporate executive is an employee of the owners of the business. He has direct responsibility to his employers. That responsibility is to conduct the business in accordance with their desires, which generally will be to make as much money as possible while conforming to the basic rules of their society, both those embodied in law and those embodied in ethical custom.”

That is, maximize profit to the extent that shareholders desire, but only within ethical and legal boundaries. I would submit that progressives and free marketers agree on this point but differ in how those ethical and legal boundaries should be designed, and what it is that shareholders actually want.

The hard question is how far to let private enterprise go in using free markets to allocate resources and make economic decisions. When does social and environmental degradation outweigh the productivity created by the invisible hand? And when is the collective action through government needed to rein in the collateral damage of competition?

Corporate Political Spending

This is where corporate political spending becomes a problem. In a democracy, legal boundaries should be created in a process that treats all voices equally. But money gives business interests outsized influence in setting the very bounds that Friedman cited as legitimating profit-seeking.

Corporate money has deregulated the finance industry, distorted government capacity to address climate change, and limited the very competition that makes the free market an essential tool for price discovery and resource allocation.

Big money eats away at the heart of our democracy. We must overturn Citizens United. And my Accountable Capitalism Act would require 75% of shareholders & board members to approve corporate political spending so government doesn’t work just for CEOs. https://t.co/ukrZSSO8WF

— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) December 10, 2018

Citizens United, the Supreme Court decision that freed corporations from important spending restrictions, has made it virtually impossible to rein in this spending. There is now a wasteful spending arm’s race, in which business spends ever more on influence to expand profits without creating anything new, and less on the innovation that creates shared and durable value. This is the worst nightmares of free-market conservatives and progressives combined: government interference in the market to advance the interests of the powerful.

In an ominous turn, corporations are now using their influence to suppress accountability to shareholders, although Friedman’s theory relies on corporate responsiveness to shareholders for its legitimacy: proxy rules are being reinterpreted and rewritten to make it harder for shareholders to insist that corporations respond to their desires.

The powerful CEO lobbying group Business Roundtable wants to leave the drawing of boundaries to corporate managers, defying both the political and corporate democracy that Friedman’s theory relies upon.

Legislation and Regulation

This combination of factors puts our economy at risk, as shown by the market crash of 2008 and the wildfires ravaging California. The pursuit of profit through legislation and regulation that leaves common environmental and social resources unprotected does not only threaten those resources; it threatens the average shareholder saving for retirement or education, which is diversified and reliant on healthy markets and systems that thrive over the long run.

A protestor outside of the Supreme Court demonstrating against the Citizens United decision.
A protestor outside of the Supreme Court demonstrating against the Citizens United decision. Photo: Roll Call

Institutional shareholders, such as pension and mutual funds, hold the lion’s share of stock in large public companies. They owe it to their beneficiaries to encourage corporate support for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United, as promoted by organizations like Business for American Promise.

These institutions must also serve as the voice of the average shareholder in rulemaking proceedings and litigation around proxy rules so that shareholders can continue to advocate for reduced political spending at the companies they own. In addition, they can engage directly with companies in their portfolios to create substantive political spending guardrails. These actions will help support a thriving, innovative economy that works for all of us and our children.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
ShareTweet
Frederick Alexander

Frederick Alexander

Founder of The Shareholder Commons, a nonprofit organization seeking a shift from unbridled profit-seeking to capitalism that values only those profits that are good for the planet and its inhabitants

Related Posts

Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023
Opinion

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

by Matthew J. Mayer
February 3, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York
Opinion

George Santos for Speaker!

by Stephen J. Lyons
January 16, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives
National

Chaos as US House Adjourns Without Choosing Speaker

by Staff Writer
January 4, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines
Opinion

Eight Billion and Counting…

by Stephen J. Lyons
November 29, 2022
US services sector
Business

US Services Growth Slips to Lowest Level Since 2020: Survey

by Staff Writer
November 3, 2022
US President Donald Trump
Opinion

Donald Trump Thanks You for Your Sacrifice

by Stephen J. Lyons
August 17, 2022
Next Post
A sorghum farmer inspects her small grains crop thriving in the dry conditions in March in the Mutoko rural area of Zimbabwe

Record 45 Million Need Urgent Food Aid in Southern Africa: UN

Report: North Korea Miniaturizes Nuclear Warhead to Fit Ballistic Missiles

Millennials Fear Nuclear War in Next Decade: Survey

Recommended

An AFP journalist views an example of a "deepfake" video manipulated using artificial intelligence.

Deepfake ‘News Anchors’ in Pro-China Footage: Research

February 8, 2023
Syrian rescuers and civilians search for victims and survivors amid the rubble of a collapsed building, in the rebel-held northern countryside of Syria's Idlib province on the border with Turkey, early on February 6, 2023. Syrian rescuers (White Helmets) and civilians search for victims and survivors amid the rubble of a collapsed building

Quake Kills Over 1,200 Across Turkey, Syria

February 6, 2023
Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
A supporter of nurses' strike and NHS holds a placard

UK Faces Fresh Mass Strikes as Wage Talks Derail

February 1, 2023
Israeli security forces in Jerusalem

Palestinian Gunman Kills 7 in East Jerusalem Synagogue Attack

January 30, 2023
The Doomsday Clock reads 100 seconds to midnight, a decision made by The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, during an announcement at the National Press Club in Washington, DC on January 23, 2020

‘Doomsday Clock’ Moves Closest Ever to Midnight

January 25, 2023

Opinion

Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines

Eight Billion and Counting…

November 29, 2022
Mahsa Amini protests

Imagining a Free Iran

October 24, 2022
Vladimir Putin

How 18th Century International Law Clarifies the Situation in Ukraine

September 29, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Falling for Putin

September 15, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post