• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Wednesday, February 8, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Why the US Needs to Think About Impeachment Differently

Daniel P. Franklin by Daniel P. Franklin
02/10/20
in Opinion
US President Donald Trump holding up The Washington Post that headlines 'Trump acquitted'

Senate found President Donald Trump not guilty in his impeachment trial. Photo: AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Around the time the Framers were writing the U.S. Constitution, there was a notable impeachment debate in England. Warren Hastings, the former Governor-General of Bengal, was being impeached in Parliament by a group of members led by Edmund Burke.

To remind, Burke is generally considered the father of modern conservatism. He is also known for his unique approach to the American Revolution (he wanted to grant the colonists full rights as British Subjects), later sounding the alarm on the revolution in France and promoting the idea of Burkean Representation, or the notion that you elect the mind of representatives, not their votes. To the say the least, in his day, Burke was an iconoclast.

Meaning of Impeachment

On the Hastings impeachment, Burke was no different. Even though Hastings had already left office, Burke insisted on pursuing the impeachment on the grounds that corruption in government is a matter of public policy that needed to be debated.

Burke believed that Hastings had used his position to enrich himself while abusing his Indian subjects. Burke’s concern for the rights of East India’s colonial subjects was way ahead of its time, and the idea that there was something wrong with the Empire enriching itself at the expense of its colonial subjects was laughable. However, Burke believed that impeachment was one way, perhaps the only way, to initiate a public discussion on such topics.

This incident, which was surely on the Framers’ mind in 1787, must cause us to reflect on the meaning of impeachment. Obviously, there are partisan and personal implications of impeachment and removal. But just as importantly, the impeachment process allows us to have a public and frank discussion about what constitutes corruption in the American government.

Trump’s Impeachment

Whether President Donald Trump was actually impeached and removed will, in the long run, be less important than the debate we had on what is right and proper behavior in the Executive Branch. And if this behavior happens all the time, as the Republicans have argued, then it is high time that we discuss whether this behavior is ever right or wrong, to what degree, and under what conditions.

Think of impeachment as part of Congress’ oversight function. Because the Constitution grants office holders set terms, if the concept of impeachment hadn’t existed in the 18th century, it would have had to be invented.

In a parliamentary system, there is a corrective for suspect leadership: new elections. But since we don’t have that in the United States, we need a way to remove malign public officials before the end of their terms. Granted, it is more important to have this authority as it applies to judges who serve for life.

But, on occasion, it might be necessary to apply impeachment to elected officials and their appointees. However, the argument that there is always going to be another election is a powerful one and certainly applies in this case.

And even if the president is exonerated in the Senate, we’ve had a public discussion on the proper role of the executive in government. Can the president refuse to cooperate with congressional investigations? Is it okay to run backchannel diplomacy through the use of private citizens? Can the president withhold appropriated funds for policy purposes not envisioned in the original law? Is it fair for Congress to investigate the president’s personal dealings, say, by requesting he turn over his tax returns? And these aren’t just questions of “either/or” but rather, these are questions of a matter of degree and under what circumstances.

Therefore, it is important to think of impeachment, as Burke did, as a public policy process.

Impeachment as Public Policy Process

Impeachment is not a criminal trial. Had President Trump been convicted and removed, there would have been no criminal penalties. The president is not indicted in the manner of a criminal trial, nor is the trial in the Senate conducted under criminal procedure.

Indeed, the president doesn’t even have to commit a crime to be removed. But during the trial, we have at least had a frank discussion of what is right and wrong behavior of our public officials.

If we think of Trump’s impeachment as a public policy debate instead of a trial, here are some of the takeaways.

First, we’ve always known that impeachment is a political and not a legal process. The Republican Party has reminded us of that.

Second, polarization makes impeachment more likely, but removal all but impossible.

The Impeachment Hoax, just a continuation of the Witch Hunt which started even before I won the Election, must end quickly. Read the Transcripts, see the Ukrainian President’s strong statement, NO PRESSURE – get this done. It is a con game by the Dems to help with the Election!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 6, 2020

Third, as a public policy debate, this impeachment is not precedent for anything. It is not the same as a Supreme Court decision, and if the shoe were on the other foot, and Barack Obama was president and had done exactly the same, Republicans would have been on board for impeachment. Indeed, the essence of the public policy process is to overturn precedent.

Is this a dangerous situation? It sure is. But as someone who lived most of his young life under the threat of Soviet nuclear attack, the prospect of a Trump dictatorship in the manner of the German National Socialism is just as unlikely and a lot less final. We’re still a long way from a dictatorship in the United States.

Finally, as a public policy process, the Trump impeachment has cast into stark contrast the philosophical gap between the Democratic and Republican parties. On the assumption that we are going to have a reasonably free and fair election in November, the Trump impeachment will help voters decide.

Obviously, given the charged atmosphere of the partisan debate, the impeachment process has generated a lot of heat and discomfort. But if we step back and look at impeachment as part of the legislative process, we can turn down the heat and consider an important policy issue, one that predates the Trump administration and has been brewing ever since the rise of the Imperial presidency.

Let us welcome the debate, and when it comes to our positions, give no quarter. Because what we are determining here, no less than in the passage of a law, is the future of our government.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
ShareTweet
Daniel P. Franklin

Daniel P. Franklin

Associate Professor Emeritus, Georgia State University

Related Posts

Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023
Opinion

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

by Matthew J. Mayer
February 3, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York
Opinion

George Santos for Speaker!

by Stephen J. Lyons
January 16, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives
National

Chaos as US House Adjourns Without Choosing Speaker

by Staff Writer
January 4, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines
Opinion

Eight Billion and Counting…

by Stephen J. Lyons
November 29, 2022
Donald Trump
National

US Supreme Court Freezes Release of Trump Tax Returns

by Staff Writer
November 1, 2022
Donald Trump
National

US Capitol Riot Probe Votes to Subpoena Trump to Testify

by Staff Writer
October 13, 2022
Next Post
Scottish independence activists rally to call for a second referendum, 2016.

UK PM Warned of Court Battle Over Scottish Independence Vote

Sinn Fein Finds its Voice in Ireland After Historic Popular Vote Win

Sinn Fein Finds its Voice in Ireland After Historic Popular Vote Win

Recommended

An AFP journalist views an example of a "deepfake" video manipulated using artificial intelligence.

Deepfake ‘News Anchors’ in Pro-China Footage: Research

February 8, 2023
Syrian rescuers and civilians search for victims and survivors amid the rubble of a collapsed building, in the rebel-held northern countryside of Syria's Idlib province on the border with Turkey, early on February 6, 2023. Syrian rescuers (White Helmets) and civilians search for victims and survivors amid the rubble of a collapsed building

Quake Kills Over 1,200 Across Turkey, Syria

February 6, 2023
Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
A supporter of nurses' strike and NHS holds a placard

UK Faces Fresh Mass Strikes as Wage Talks Derail

February 1, 2023
Israeli security forces in Jerusalem

Palestinian Gunman Kills 7 in East Jerusalem Synagogue Attack

January 30, 2023
The Doomsday Clock reads 100 seconds to midnight, a decision made by The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, during an announcement at the National Press Club in Washington, DC on January 23, 2020

‘Doomsday Clock’ Moves Closest Ever to Midnight

January 25, 2023

Opinion

Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines

Eight Billion and Counting…

November 29, 2022
Mahsa Amini protests

Imagining a Free Iran

October 24, 2022
Vladimir Putin

How 18th Century International Law Clarifies the Situation in Ukraine

September 29, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Falling for Putin

September 15, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post