• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Thursday, July 10, 2025
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

US Migration ‘Protection’ Protocols Lead to Violence Instead

Danielle Douglas and Karen Jacobsen by Danielle Douglas and Karen Jacobsen
02/19/20
in Opinion
Children look through the border fence in Ciudad Juarez at the US-Mexico border on January 31, 2020

The US-Mexico border. Photo: Herika Martinez, AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

It’s been over a year since the United States’ Migration Protection Protocols (MPP), also known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy, went into effect. In that time, violence against migrants in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador has increased, according to a report by Doctors Without Borders (MSF).

In the first nine months of 2019, the U.S. returned 55,000 people to Mexico under the policy, and MSF found that almost 80 percent of people treated at a clinic on the border had been a victim of violence. The number of sexual violence cases treated in Mexico during those months also more than doubled, and 40 percent of patients stated that “they had needed medical attention at some point but were unable to access health services.”

When former Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen officially introduced the MPP policy, she said the goals were “to confront this [migration] crisis head on, uphold the rule of law, and strengthen our humanitarian commitments.” The Mexican government echoed this, permitting asylum seekers to “stay for humanitarian reasons.”

But the MSF report and testimonies from those returned to Mexico under the policy indicate that the outcome has been far from humane. The U.S.’s Central American immigration policies are heightening the already high levels of violence faced by migrants.

US Central American Immigration Policies

The Trump administration’s MPP sought to limit the number of undocumented migrants entering the United States. Migrants arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border would need to wait in Mexico for their asylum claims to be processed. The U.S. and Mexican governments negotiated a partnership, and in June 2019, the policy expanded to cover the entire southern border.

The U.S. is extending this policy beyond Mexico. In 2019, the U.S. signed “safe third country agreements” with Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador. These agreements mean that migrants who cross these countries on their way to the U.S. must apply for asylum in the first “safe” country they enter. In effect, the policy renders migrants’ attempts to apply for asylum at the U.S. border invalid, because they had already passed through a country that could have theoretically provided them protection.

So far, only the agreement with Guatemala has been implemented. But the “safe third country” policy violates the U.S.’s own immigration laws because these third countries aren’t capable of providing adequate safety or fair procedures for asylum determination. The American Civil Liberties Union is currently suing the Trump administration in protest.

Additionally, because the U.S. is party to the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, the U.S. is legally bound by the principle of non-refoulment, meaning it cannot send refugees and asylum seekers back to countries where they will be at risk of persecution. But the MPP and “safe third country” agreements are an attempt to work around this principle. Asylum seekers are being “returned” to countries where they could theoretically get legal protection, but in reality, are faced with violence and few reliable procedures for asylum status.

Asylum Limbo and Escalating Violence

MSF provides emergency medical care at clinics along the Central American migrant path in El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, and Mexico, while also giving insight into the everyday realities as more people become stuck in this asylum limbo.

Last week, I paid a visit to the U.S.- Mexico Border to see firsthand the impact of the policies this administration has been advancing – specifically, the “Remain in Mexico” policy targeting asylum seekers. What I witnessed was an utter disgrace. pic.twitter.com/86chCBqlHD

— Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (@repcleaver) February 18, 2020

In the border zones, MSF has seen increasing physical, social, and psychological violence: 57 percent of patients faced violence along the migration route in Mexico, and in October 2019 alone, 75 percent of those returned to Mexico through the MPP program had been a victim of an attempted kidnapping. Kidnapping and escalating violence were likely not the way the American government intended to express its “humanitarian commitments.”

Violence Before Asylum Seeking

Well before they cross a border, a third of Central American migrants become internally displaced within their home country. Violence in their hometowns, perpetrated by gangs or drug cartels, forces families or individuals to flee elsewhere within their country. But the violence follows them or is already present in the places they flee to, and many see no alternative but to leave their country and travel north, facing violence along the way.

Those who do not turn back in despair and make it to the U.S. border are no longer able to apply for legitimate asylum. Instead, they become stuck in legal purgatory, or are sent back hundreds of miles to a country that is not their own and likely will not offer them the protection they need.

Given this cycle of violence, immigration policymakers must be held accountable for the dangers that asylum seekers face at the U.S. border. By pushing migrants back into the jurisdiction of other countries, the U.S. government is essentially saying “not in my backyard.” But the U.S. has always been a haven for people fleeing danger. Why should the safety of those fleeing today be valued any less than the safety of those who emigrated from Europe in the past?

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
ShareTweet
Danielle Douglas and Karen Jacobsen

Danielle Douglas and Karen Jacobsen

Danielle Douglas is a master's candidate at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, focusing on migration and human security. Karen Jacobsen is Henry J. Leir Professor of Global Migration, Fletcher School of Law & Diplomacy, Tufts University.

Related Posts

Donald Trump
Opinion

Fact vs. Fiction: The Trump Administration’s Dubious War on Reverse Discrimination

by Kevin Cokley
June 18, 2025
A Black Lives Matter mural in New York City.
Opinion

Fuhgeddaboudit! America’s Erasure of History

by Stephen J. Lyons
April 2, 2025
Smoke from the Palisades Fire in Pacific Palisades, California, from Santa Monica, California, on January 7
National

Los Angeles Fire Deaths at 10 as National Guard Called In

by Staff Writer with AFP
January 10, 2025
President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky shake hands during a meeting in New York on September 25, 2019
World

Zelensky Says ‘Unpredictable’ Trump Could Help End War

by Staff Writer with AFP
January 2, 2025
President Donald Trump in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House.
National

Trump Wishes ‘Merry Christmas’ to ‘Left Lunatics’ in Frenzy of Social Posts

by Staff Writer with AFP
December 27, 2024
US President Donald Trump inspects border wall prototypes
National

Trump Confirms Plan to Use Military for Mass Deportation

by Staff Writer with AFP
November 18, 2024
Next Post
UN flag

Nearly Three Million in Need of Aid in Niger, UN Says

Mahinda Rajapaksa

Sri Lanka Government Will Not Honor UN War Crimes Pledge

Recommended

Women in Afghanistan wearing a blue burqa

ICC Seeks Arrest of Taliban Leaders Over Persecution of Women

July 9, 2025
Kenya, Nairobi, 2024-07-16. Protesters in the streets

Nairobi Tense as Kenya Marks Democracy Uprising

July 7, 2025
President Donald Trump

Trump Wins ‘Phenomenal’ Victory as Congress Passes Flagship Bill

July 4, 2025
University students march in protest towards the Istanbul Municipality in Sarachane as they demonstrate against the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu in Istanbul, Turkey, on March 21, 2025.

‘Remember Charlie Hebdo!’ Protesters Seethe at Istanbul Magazine

July 2, 2025
US President Donald Trump

US Senate Edges Towards Vote on Trump’s Divisive Spending Bill

June 30, 2025
Protests in Hong Kong in 2019.

Hong Kong’s Dragnet Widens 5 Years After National Security Law

June 27, 2025

Opinion

Donald Trump

Fact vs. Fiction: The Trump Administration’s Dubious War on Reverse Discrimination

June 18, 2025
Tens of thousands of protestors shut down Fifth Avenue in Manhattan on Saturday, April 5, 2025, protesting the Trump administration's abuse of the separation of federal powers as well as the deep cuts to governmental services overseen by presidential advisor Elon Musk.

Civil Society Is Holding the Line. Will Washington Notice?

June 17, 2025
A Black Lives Matter mural in New York City.

Fuhgeddaboudit! America’s Erasure of History

April 2, 2025
Bust of Deputy Rubens Paiva in the Chamber of Deputies

Democratic Brazilians Are Still Here

March 18, 2025
A woman from Guatemala

Dispatch From Central America

January 28, 2025
US President Donald Trump

Dear Trump Supporters: Is This the America You Wanted?

January 28, 2025
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post