• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Sunday, May 22, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home National

Future of Abortion at Stake in US Supreme Court Case

Staff Writer by Staff Writer
03/04/20
in National
Abortion rights activists rally in front of the US Supreme Court in Washington on a day of nationwide demonstrations seeking to push back against laws restricting abortion access that have been passed in Republican-led states

Abortion rights activists rallying in front of the US Supreme Court. Photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds, AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The United States Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear what may be its most significant case in decades on the controversial subject of abortion.

At issue is a state law in Louisiana which requires doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

Groups in favor of abortion argue that the law would severely restrict access to the practice and lead to the closure of two of three remaining abortion clinics in the southern state.

The case, June Medical Services v Russo, will be the first on the hot button issue to come before the court since President Donald Trump appointed two conservative justices — Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — to the nine-member bench.

Their appointments have galvanized anti-abortion activists in the country’s conservative “Bible Belt,” and several states have passed tough laws restricting the practice. A ban in Alabama even covered cases of rape.

That and most of those other laws have been struck down by lower courts, but anti-abortion groups are hoping to put the issue before the Supreme Court and force it to revisit Roe v. Wade.

“The case is significant because the law that is being challenged is more or less identical to one that the court struck down in 2016,” said Mary Ziegler, a law professor at Florida State University.

“Switching court membership? Is that enough to undo a case?” asked Ziegler, author of “Beyond Abortion: Roe v Wade and the Battle for Privacy.”

Roe v Wade is the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case that legalized a woman’s right to an abortion.

Ziegler said the ruling in the Louisiana case “might tell you something about how the court might view other precedent, including Roe v Wade.”

Today’s the day.

We will be outside of the Supreme Court to speak up with one voice: Abortion is a RIGHT. pic.twitter.com/FHcGycQ8UU

— ACLU (@ACLU) March 4, 2020

Trump, who years ago described himself as “pro-choice in every respect,” has flip-flopped to become a staunch opponent of abortion as he seeks to rally evangelical Christians behind his re-election campaign.

Anti-abortion campaigner Catherine Glenn Foster, head of United for Life, said: “We go forward with hope in our hearts and with confidence in our court.”

On Wednesday, protesters from both sides of the debate were stationed in front of the Supreme Court, where Dennis McKirahan, a 75-year-old abortion opponent from Cincinnati said “we must stop killing babies.”

Not far away, Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, part of a handful of politicians who spoke to the respective sides, told AFP that he was “deeply concerned that reproductive rights may be gravely in danger.”

Protester Liz Borkowki, 42, added that “facts haven’t changed since 2016, the law hasn’t changed since 2016. The only thing that has changed is the composition of the court.”

‘Protecting Women’

A ruling in the case is expected in June, just months ahead of the November presidential vote.

The Trump administration is backing Louisiana authorities in the case, along with more than 200 Republican members of Congress.

The lawmakers argued in a supporting brief that the case illustrates the “unworkability of the ‘right to abortion’ found in Roe” and questioned whether it should be “reconsidered and, if appropriate, overruled.”

“This is, my friends, what protecting women looks like in Louisiana,” said state senator Katrina Jackson, who is sponsoring the bill.

“Your physician … can immediately phone the hospital and admit you.”

But on Wednesday, Julie Rikelman, a lawyer with the Center for Reproductive Rights, argued to the justices that the requirements have “no medical benefits whatever, and only impose barriers to abortion,”

Abortion rights supporters say banning abortion entirely is the ultimate intent of the law in Louisiana and similar legislation in other states that restrict the practice.

“Louisiana is openly defying the Supreme Court’s decision from just three years ago, in which they found an identical Texas law unconstitutional,” said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights.

“We are counting on the court to follow its precedent.”

But Louisiana, where about 10,000 abortions are carried out every year, argues that the law is needed to protect women’s health.

“Abortion carries known risks of serious complications that may require intervention in a hospital,” the state said in a brief for the court.

Besides protecting women, “the process for obtaining admitting privileges serves to vet physician competency,” it said.

The Supreme Court, in a five to four vote, blocked the application of the law in February 2019 but without delivering a final decision.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined the four liberal justices on the bench in temporarily blocking the law. He is seen as the key vote this time around.


More on the Subject 

New Race: Bloomberg Suspends Campaign, Endorses Resurgent Biden After Super Tuesday

ShareTweet
Staff Writer

Staff Writer

AFP with The Globe Post

Related Posts

abortion rights protest
Featured

US Companies Break Long Silence on Abortion Rights

by Staff Writer
May 9, 2022
US Supreme Court abortion
National

US Supreme Court Allows Abortion Providers to Challenge Texas Law

by Staff Writer
December 10, 2021
Nestle is asking the court to block the suit against them from going forward
National

US Supreme Court Considers Firms’ Liability for Africa Child Slavery

by Staff Writer
December 1, 2020
A man waves a rainbow flag as he rides by the US Supreme Court that released a decision that says federal law protects LGBTQ workers from discrimination on June 15, 2020 in Washington,DC.
Featured

Unmasking the ‘Right to Harm:’ the US Supreme Court and the Attack on LGBTQ Lives

by Jonathan Branfman
October 26, 2021
Children look through the border fence in Ciudad Juarez at the US-Mexico border on January 31, 2020
National

US Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ Asylum Policy

by Staff Writer
March 11, 2020
The Supreme Court of the United States.
National

US Supreme Court to Take on LBGTQ Rights in the Workplace

by Staff Writer
October 8, 2019
Next Post
Charred areas of the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, August 27, 2019

Amazon, African Forests Turning From CO2 Sink to Source: Study

Syrians at a site of car bomb in Idlib

Swathes of NW Syria Uninhabitable for Years: Report

Recommended

Volkswagen logo

German Farmer Sues Volkswagen Over CO2 Emissions

May 20, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Russia Says Economy Grew 3.5 Percent in First Quarter

May 18, 2022
Mexico missing people

Over 100,000 People Reported Missing in Mexico, Data Reveals

May 17, 2022
Shireen Abu Akleh

Jerusalem Archbishop Condemns Israeli Police Raid at Journalist’s Funeral

May 16, 2022
A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
Israel

15 European Nations Urge Israel to Reverse Plans for More Settler Homes

May 13, 2022

Opinion

A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Ukraine war

The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Hierarchies of Western Compassion

April 20, 2022
Chinese leader Xi Jinping

How Wrong ‘How China Can End the War in Ukraine’ Is

April 1, 2022
Ukraine children

The War for Ukraine’s Lives and Minds

March 30, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post