• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Tuesday, May 30, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Social Media and Electoral Dynamics: Reversing ‘Incumbency Advantage’ in the US

Pinar Yildirim, Maria Petrova, and Ananya Sen by Pinar Yildirim, Maria Petrova, and Ananya Sen
07/24/20
in Opinion
Twitter logo displayed on a computer screen

Photo: AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In the United States, incumbents – politicians who once wore out the pavements of Washington, DC – often get re-elected. Research has documented that in some years well over 90 percent of incumbents seeking re-election have been successful. This is known as the “incumbency advantage.”

Having been elected to an office before buys a politician financial support, connections to influential people, and higher media coverage in future elections. While re-electing incumbents to an office can have benefits, it also limits electoral competition. Tall barriers of money and lack of communication channels push otherwise capable politicians away from running for office.

However, there’s a cheaper, grassroots way to reverse the incumbency advantage: social media.

Politicians and Social Media

Yesterday’s highly calculated, rarely-spotted-in-public politicians are replaced with their Twitter personas, expressing views on issues big and small, without putting them through much of a filter. Never have politicians been so accessible to the public.

Through their communication via social media, we do not just learn about politicians’ views on policy issues, but also about their lifestyle, family and pets, favorite sports team, or favorite local joint.

Let me formally introduce you to our new dog Buddy. Buddy is a big source of joy in our household. Like his “brother” @firstdogtruman he represents the many loving dogs in shelters who need homes. pic.twitter.com/UaDr4g0FAP

— Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) December 19, 2018

Pete Buttigieg likes to talk about his two dogs. Senator Chuck Grassley tweets about the History Channel and the University of Northern Iowa Panthers games. So why do thousands of politicians, even the president of the United States, communicate through Twitter?  What are the tangible benefits of using social media?

Twitter Accounts and Donations

With Maria Petrova and Ananya Sen, in an upcoming piece at Management Science, we tested if communicating on social media altered the support for a politician and if there were some losers and winners from this new world of political communication.

We measured support in the form of donations that politicians receive from ordinary citizens and tested if politicians were able to raise more donations after opening a Twitter account.

Americans donate to politics, and many do so in surprisingly small amounts: $25, $50, or $100. Given how little such donations can alter a race’s outcome, these donations symbolize a belief or a hope that, if there are enough others out there each donating a small amount, the result of an election can be changed. In a way, a donation is the sincerest form of support a citizen can show to a politician.

Looking at how the donations to politicians changed after they opened a Twitter account, we found an interesting result. Within a month of opening their account, the average politician saw a statistically and economically significant increase in the donations received. But new and experienced politicians benefited very differently from broadcasting to the public.

“Experienced” politicians – those who have been elected to a public office in the past – saw nearly no benefits. On the contrary, “new” politicians – those who had never been elected to a public office before – saw a significant increase in donations received upon opening a Twitter account, up to 6 percent of what they can expect to raise in one year of campaigning.

Social Media and Political Competition

However, the most immediate benefit of social media is that it gives politicians a “low cost” battleground to compete, communicate, and make themselves known.

Newcomers like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez would have had a hard time affording TV and newspaper ads, and perhaps could not run a successful campaign two decades ago. But with social media, even without spending advertising dollars, politicians can now find a way to communicate with their constituency. The ability to communicate with large audiences allows new, often money-bound politicians to find a voice.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez celebrates with supporters after her victory in Democratic primary in New York’s 14th district in June 2018. Photo: AFP

When we look at politicians’ use of language and the returns associated with it, we find that donations are higher when a politician speaks more informatively (by including a hyperlink/URL sharing more information), uses a more inclusive language (using words such as “we” instead of “I”), and has a more “plugged in” communication style (referring to and responding to other tweets).

There is also a curious correlation between donations and using an “anti-establishment” language. Of course, perhaps there is more to communicating through social media. It may signal one’s character, such as being open or accountable, caring about others, or a desire to listen to them.

Regardless of the exact reason, new politicians’ ability to find support via social media communication is immensely important. With cheaper communication channels, the incumbency advantage can be reduced, and perhaps someday, reversed. And as political campaigns are becoming increasingly more expensive and the need to reach out to constituencies is becoming more vital, social media will undoubtedly play a more important role in determining electoral outcomes as it gives young politicians a platform.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
ShareTweet
Pinar Yildirim, Maria Petrova, and Ananya Sen

Pinar Yildirim, Maria Petrova, and Ananya Sen

Pinar Yildirim is Assistant Professor of Marketing at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Maria Petrova is ICREA Research Professor at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Researcher at the Barcelona Institute for Political Economy and Governance (IPEG), and Affiliate Professor at Barcelona Graduate School of Economics. Ananya Sen is Assistant Professor at Carnegie Mellon University.

Related Posts

A noose is seen on makeshift gallows as supporters of US President Donald Trump gather on the West side of the US Capitol in Washington DC on January 6, 2021
National

Militia Leader Gets 18 Years in Prison Over US Capitol Attack

by Staff Writer
May 26, 2023
A billboard showing the debt limit is seen in Washington, D.C.
National

US Republicans Upbeat on Prospects for Debt Deal

by Staff Writer
May 19, 2023
Military hardware rolls through Dvortsovaya Square during a Victory Day military parade in central Saint Petersburg
National

Pressing Russia, US Shares Nuclear Warhead Data Under Treaty

by Staff Writer
May 16, 2023
A man holding a gun
Opinion

The NRA’s Continuing Agenda of Fear

by Stephen J. Lyons
May 12, 2023
US Panel Recommends Nonprescription Use of Contraception Pill
National

US Panel Recommends Nonprescription Use of Contraception Pill

by Staff Writer
May 11, 2023
A laptop screen showing ChatGPT
National

Scientists Use Brain Scans and AI to ‘Decode’ Thoughts

by Staff Writer
May 1, 2023
Next Post
A woman checks her phone as she shelters under an umbrella in the rain on Oxford Street in London on June 18, 2020, as some non-essential retailers reopen from their coronavirus shutdown.

Tech’s Dominant Power Undermines Our Human Right to Privacy

Novel coronavirus outbreak / China

COVID-19 Cases on the Rise Again in China

Please login to join discussion

Recommended

A noose is seen on makeshift gallows as supporters of US President Donald Trump gather on the West side of the US Capitol in Washington DC on January 6, 2021

Militia Leader Gets 18 Years in Prison Over US Capitol Attack

May 26, 2023
Customers queue to enter a re-opened Zara clothes shop

EU Targets Fast Fashion in Push for Durable Goods

May 23, 2023
A billboard showing the debt limit is seen in Washington, D.C.

US Republicans Upbeat on Prospects for Debt Deal

May 19, 2023
Military hardware rolls through Dvortsovaya Square during a Victory Day military parade in central Saint Petersburg

Pressing Russia, US Shares Nuclear Warhead Data Under Treaty

May 16, 2023
A man holding a gun

The NRA’s Continuing Agenda of Fear

May 12, 2023
US Panel Recommends Nonprescription Use of Contraception Pill

US Panel Recommends Nonprescription Use of Contraception Pill

May 11, 2023

Opinion

A man holding a gun

The NRA’s Continuing Agenda of Fear

May 12, 2023
US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas

A Supreme Folly 

April 24, 2023
Transgender Army veteran Tanya Walker speaks to protesters in Times Square near a military recruitment centre

Tennessee Is A Drag on the First Amendment

March 26, 2023
Chinese President Xi Jinping

China’s Path to Economic Dominance

March 15, 2023
An earthquake survivor reacts as rescuers look for victims and other survivors in Hatay, a Turkish province where hundreds of buildings were destroyed by the earthquake

Heed the Call of Our Broken World

March 1, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives

‘Cringy Awards:’ Who Is the Most Embarrassing US House Representative?

February 13, 2023
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post