• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Wednesday, February 1, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Pandemic Diplomacy Gets Failing Grades. Could Tele-Diplomacy Help Us Think Afresh?

Paul Hare by Paul Hare
08/07/20
in Opinion
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres holds a virtual press conference at UN headquarters in New York City, Friday, April 3, 2020

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres holds a virtual press conference at UN headquarters in New York City, Friday, April 3, 2020. Photo: AFP/UN Photo

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The pandemic has produced some strange diplomatic results. The EU has applied travel sanctions on the citizens of the United States. Cuba and China have been active with medical diplomacy in Italy. The World Health Organization has proved a convenient scapegoat for many sovereign states. Australia’s exports have been cut simply because it criticized China.

Much has been written about “The New World Disorder,” how tackling the issue of climate security will be even harder, or, as Council on Foreign Relations President Richard Haas argues, whether the pandemic will just accelerate the pace of history.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres saw the failure of diplomacy in bleak terms. “The world was not able to come together to face COVID-19 in an articulated coordinated way,” he concluded in May. “Each country went with its own policy in different countries with different perspectives, different strategies, and this has allowed the virus to spread.”

#COVID19 is a crisis unlike any in the 75-year history of the @UN.

World leaders must come together and offer an urgent & coordinated global response.

More than ever before, we need solidarity, hope and the political will to see this through together.https://t.co/4qGoAhTYpe pic.twitter.com/yogPhUio7l

— António Guterres (@antonioguterres) March 19, 2020

Despite facing the most global of threats, little that diplomacy tried collectively worked. Major institutional mechanisms such as the UN, G20, and EU have been mostly invisible.

Yes, blame the states. But also blame all of us who care about diplomacy. Nationalism and multilateralism are never good fits. However, this goes beyond the era of Donald Trump’s America First and its distaste for dialogue.

The question, amid a global crisis, is why collective diplomacy is now shunned. The principal team game that is supposed to bolster global security and prosperity is hardly being played.

Resetting of Diplomatic Options

Major crises in the past produced a resetting of diplomatic options. The obvious example is 1945. After World War II, at negotiations of the United Nations in San Francisco, representatives of some 1,200 volunteer organizations were present. They pushed for the first seven words of the Charter, “We the peoples of the United Nations…” In those days, diplomacy was everyone’s business.

However, there were problems with diplomatic institutions and options well before the pandemic.

International diplomatic institutions develop rivalries and obstacles to consensus-building through their own operations, and institutions are costly to run. Those who pay most usually get the spoils.

The United Nations (UN) Security Council votes at United Nations Headquarters in New York
The UN Security Council. Photo: Don Emmert/AFP

On top of that, many institutions reflect the priorities of the eras in which they were created. Still, diplomacy is increasingly bypassing institutional structures, and increasing personalization of relations between state leaders is a poor basis for consensus-building.

Additionally, digital media has stimulated uni-directional attention-grabbing by states, an easy escape-valve from institutional gridlock.

Lastly, there has been no systematic integration of global non-state actors into diplomatic platforms.

New Options 

Leaving the well-documented obstacles to UN reform aside, the major difficulty with new options is developing them. Governments see little political gain in promoting diplomacy as an issue.

So, what are the options? Diplomacy will still need its institutions, summits, permanent missions, and specialist agencies. Bureaucratic inertia tolerates diplomatic institutions long after their utility has faded.

My suggestion is to leave what we have alone and think afresh. The digital era, apart from the raucous chaos of social media finger-pointing — sometimes linked with the more constructive activity of public diplomacy — has hardly been exploited by the practitioners of diplomacy who aim to build consensus and avoid conflict.

Tele-medicine and tele-education have already shown that confidential and mutually beneficial conversations can take place on digital platforms, away from the glare of trolls and memes. Why not collectively use tele-diplomacy?

Mutual Benefit from Diplomacy

While many international stakeholders in diplomacy have multiple identities — practitioners, scholars, activists, businesses, owners of tech platforms — they all share an interest in giving diplomacy more options for collective action.

Pandemics, climate security, cyber warfare, terrorism, weapons proliferation, and migration and displacement are issues where states recognize interdependence. There is mutual benefit from diplomacy. How it is conducted affects global and individual interests.

Let’s all take the blame. Diplomacy in 2020 cannot be a spectator sport. No citizen in any country would accept being denied an interest in how pandemics are handled. Diplomacy should be no different.

New Tele-Diplomacy Forum

To be effective, a new tele-diplomacy forum needs to be continuous, not related to a particular crisis, and must involve all the G20 countries at a minimum. It should be discreet, a forum to brainstorm, and a shared commitment to making diplomacy work better.

There would be opportunities to involve non-state actors on an ad hoc basis. Philanthropists Jack Ma and Melinda Gates are already helping the UN analyze digital interdependence. It would be an option for diplomacy to build consensus. No funding would be needed or communiqués issued — just an acknowledgment that diplomatic interaction in the 2020s requires a new mindset.

We truly live in the age of digital interdependence!

A year ago, #DigitalCooperation high-level panel launched their report @melindagates @antonioguterres @nikolaiastrup.

Still rings true: Our path forward must be built through cooperation and illuminated by shared human values https://t.co/VNftCIRfRk

— NorwayUN (@NorwayUN) June 10, 2020

Such a forum would need structure. Each representative in participating G20 countries might be allocated a leadership role on specific issues to edge toward some consensus through collective consideration. And the forum would be ready for rapid response to the next global crisis. There may be a risk of leaks, but past practices of collective discussions suggest that these are rare.

What’s in it for the powers who prefer unilateral solutions to major problems? Well, intelligence services always value knowledge about the thinking of others. And peer pressure matters in this digital age. If this option proves ineffective, we should be capable of thinking of something else that goes beyond more hand-wringing.

There is a precedent, and we did well in the past. The UN and its agencies were designed to promote peace and economic stability for the world of 1945. It was risky and untried then. Now is the time to float a movement for better diplomacy in a digitalized and multi-polar world.

Diplomacy should not be using a toolkit from the last century. It needs to be restructured to collaborate constructively and continuously through not just the next pandemic but in any crisis that cannot be solved by individual states.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
ShareTweet
Paul Hare

Paul Hare

Served as UK ambassador to Cuba. Now teaches international relations at the Pardee School of Global Studies at Boston University

Related Posts

George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York
Opinion

George Santos for Speaker!

by Stephen J. Lyons
January 16, 2023
People cool off with a fountain's water during a heat wave in Seville, Spain
Environment

UN Confirms 2022 Among Eight Hottest Years on Record

by Staff Writer
January 13, 2023
A woman undergoing COVID test in China
Featured

Soaring Covid Cases Shine Light on China’s Healthcare Gap

by Staff Writer
January 11, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives
National

Chaos as US House Adjourns Without Choosing Speaker

by Staff Writer
January 4, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines
Opinion

Eight Billion and Counting…

by Stephen J. Lyons
November 29, 2022
Sudan clashes
World

Death Toll in Sudan’s Ethnic Clashes Rises to 13: UN

by Staff Writer
October 17, 2022
Next Post
An election worker handles vote-by-mail ballots for the presidential primary in Renton, Washington on March 10, 2020. Photo: Jason Redmond/AFP.

Voter Suppression: The Unsung Virus of 2020

WHO Press Conference

As Global Infections Near 20 Million, WHO Sees 'Shoots of Hope'

Please login to join discussion

Recommended

A supporter of nurses' strike and NHS holds a placard

UK Faces Fresh Mass Strikes as Wage Talks Derail

February 1, 2023
Israeli security forces in Jerusalem

Palestinian Gunman Kills 7 in East Jerusalem Synagogue Attack

January 30, 2023
The Doomsday Clock reads 100 seconds to midnight, a decision made by The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, during an announcement at the National Press Club in Washington, DC on January 23, 2020

‘Doomsday Clock’ Moves Closest Ever to Midnight

January 25, 2023
Police work near the scene of a mass shooting in Monterey Park, California

California Lunar New Year Mass Shooter Dead, Motive Unclear: Police

January 23, 2023
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

Race on To Replace Ardern as New Zealand Prime Minister

January 20, 2023
Pfizer logo and vaccines

Pfizer to Sell More Drugs at Cost to Poor Nations

January 18, 2023

Opinion

George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines

Eight Billion and Counting…

November 29, 2022
Mahsa Amini protests

Imagining a Free Iran

October 24, 2022
Vladimir Putin

How 18th Century International Law Clarifies the Situation in Ukraine

September 29, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Falling for Putin

September 15, 2022
US President Donald Trump

Donald Trump Thanks You for Your Sacrifice

August 17, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post