• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Featured

A Defense of Canada’s Monarchy

Stephen K. Roney by Stephen K. Roney
05/20/18
in Featured, Opinion
The royal family of the UK

British Royals stand together as they wait to see off Britain's Queen Elizabeth II after attending the Royal Family's traditional Christmas Day church service at St Mary Magdalene Church in Sandringham, Norfolk, eastern England, on December 25, 2017. Photo: AFP

13
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Bruce Mabley has argued recently in these pages that it is “Time to End the British Monarchy in Canada.” The current royal wedding indeed makes this a timely topic. I respectfully disagree. I think the monarchy is a good idea and is certainly not going to be ended in Canada any time soon.

Mabley concentrates on the issue of national sovereignty: his argument is that sharing the British queen implies we are not yet fully independent of our British former colonial masters. That may be so in a purely symbolic sense, but as a practical matter, Britain has no influence on Canadian affairs. Sharing a queen does not change that. The greater issue for Canadian independence is, and long has been, the matter of living next door to the world’s largest superpower, and speaking, most of us, the same language.

The U.S. is a good neighbour; but Canada’s situation is, as former prime minister Pierre Trudeau once said, like being a mouse sleeping next to an elephant. Given this, preserving the British monarchy is for most Canadians an assertion of our distinctness and our independence: it makes us fundamentally, constitutionally different from the U.S. and its assertive republicanism. For this reason alone, most Canadians cherish the monarchy.

Mabley’s next objection is that the monarchy is “Anglo,” and so unfair to all the other ethnicities that make up Canada. I ought, in theory, to agree with him, and object on these grounds: my own ancestry is mostly Irish Catholic. I have no reason to love an English queen who must, by law, be Protestant. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the English themselves can, and often do, make the very same objection: what, after all, is England doing with a German royal family? Except, of course, for the Duke of Edinburgh, who is Greek. And Meghan Markle, who is American, and mixed race…

The truth is, European royalty are not now and have never been of any one ethnicity. They have traditionally intermarried across national boundaries as a matter of duty. At one time, early in the 20th century, the kings of Britain, Germany, and Russia were all first cousins.

This is tremendously useful for uniting any country of mixed ethnicity – just like Canada. And, if we have borrowed our monarch from some other country, this too is standard practice: when Bulgaria, for example, decided they needed a king, they chose a cadet branch of the German royal family. Jordan, needing a king, chose an established family from Mecca. Spain and Austria were for one long period both ruled by the Bourbon family. Monarchs are in principle non-ethnic. Coming from abroad can enhance this. As a result, they cannot be suspected of favoring this local group over that.

This aspect of the British monarchy has in fact been held to be of special value to Canada’s indigenous people.

For a nation to unite and work together as a nation, it must have some unifying principle or symbol. Cooperation with strangers is otherwise not natural. There is no better such symbol than a human face. Without allegiance to a monarch and a royal family, the obvious alternative is an appeal to ties of ethnicity, to others like yourself, as if in some distant family relation. This is the nation-state. Nation states have gone bad places over the last few centuries, and Canada is not in principle a nation-state. In a nation-state, ethnic minorities are almost by definition given inferior status.

In a monarchy, by contrast, diverse ethnicities are equal.

Historically, monarchies seem to be better than nationality at unifying people under one government. This stands to reason: it is easier to identify with another human being than with a theoretical shared culture and history. Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Denmark, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, are monarchies. These are all countries commonly pointed out as having unusually high levels of social consensus, egalitarianism, and civil peace. Perhaps there is a reason.

Granted, these are all developed countries. What about those less developed?

Consider the Middle East. Which countries have been more peaceful and orderly, on the whole? The monarchies: Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan? Or the republics: Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Yemen?

Consider Southeast Asia. Which countries have done better, on the whole, at this business of peace and prosperity, Thailand and Malaysia, monarchies, or Burma, Indonesia, and Vietnam, culturally similar and similar in population, but republics?

And in Europe, which nation has been more tranquil over the last two hundred years: Britain, with its kings and queens, or France, with its republics?

Now compare Canada’s history to America’s over these same two hundred years. Both ethnically and geographically, Canada has far deeper natural divisions. Regarding the independence referendums in Quebec, Mr. Mabley quotes an American diplomat saying, “such a state of affairs led to a bloody civil war between the North and South in his country.”

Exactly. It is the U.S., not Canada, despite more obvious divisions in the latter case, that suffered a devastating civil war.

Shared allegiance to a monarch who is seen as above politics preserves a sense that everyone is in the end on the same side; and the monarch, if he or she has kept themselves out of controversies, can serve as an honest broker in any real extremity.
​
Granted, a republic looks good in theory. The people are sovereign, everyone is equal and so forth. But perhaps, in theory, is where it best belongs.

Time to End the British Monarchy in Canada

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share13Tweet
Stephen K. Roney

Stephen K. Roney

Canadian writer, editor, and college professor, now semi-retired

Related Posts

Members of the community of the Kahnawake Mohawk Territory in Quebec march through the town on May 30, to commemorate the news that a mass grave of 215 indigenous children was found at the Kamloops Residential School in British Columbia, Canada.
Featured

Facing Canada’s Role in Genocide

by Gillian McCann
October 26, 2021
People protesting against the controversial extradition bill in Hong Kong in 2019.
Democracy at Risk

US, Britain, Canada Express ‘Concern’ at Hong Kong Arrests

by Staff Writer
January 10, 2021
Conversion therapy has affected hundreds of thousands of individuals in the US.
World

More Than 300 Religious Leaders Urge Ban on ‘Conversion Therapy’

by Staff Writer
December 16, 2020
A family of asylum seekers heading towards the US-Canada border
Refugees

Canadian Court Rules US Refugee Pact Violates Rights

by Staff Writer
July 23, 2020
Demystifying Canadian Health Care: How is it Different from US?
National

Demystifying Canadian Health Care: How is it Different from US?

by Alex Graf
August 2, 2019
Quebec Premier Francois Legault
Featured

New Quebec Law Stresses Migrants’ Skills, Thousands Must Reapply

by Staff Writer
June 17, 2019
Next Post
The Xinjiang region of China

China Calls on All Mosques to Raise National Flag

Venezuela Nicolas Maduro protest

Maduro Wins Disputed Vote as Venezuela Mulls Bleak Future

Recommended

refugees

More Than 100 Million People Forcibly Displaced, UN Says

May 23, 2022
Volkswagen logo

German Farmer Sues Volkswagen Over CO2 Emissions

May 20, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Russia Says Economy Grew 3.5 Percent in First Quarter

May 18, 2022
Mexico missing people

Over 100,000 People Reported Missing in Mexico, Data Reveals

May 17, 2022
Shireen Abu Akleh

Jerusalem Archbishop Condemns Israeli Police Raid at Journalist’s Funeral

May 16, 2022
A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022

Opinion

A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Ukraine war

The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Hierarchies of Western Compassion

April 20, 2022
Chinese leader Xi Jinping

How Wrong ‘How China Can End the War in Ukraine’ Is

April 1, 2022
Ukraine children

The War for Ukraine’s Lives and Minds

March 30, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post