• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Wednesday, March 29, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Sugarcoating Torture: How Are We Being Misled?

Anthony Glees by Anthony Glees
07/25/18
in Opinion
Detainees in Guantanamo Bay

Photo: Brennan Linsey, AP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On June 28, the U.K.’s key, non-partisan parliamentary intelligence oversight body, the Intelligence and Security Committee published a report about “Detainee Mistreatment and Rendition 2001-2010.” It concluded that while U.K. secret agencies did not mistreat detainees themselves, they and therefore the U.K. government at its most senior levels had tolerated “inexcusable treatment of detainees.”

The evidence presented in the report makes horrifying reading: in 232 cases U.K. intelligence and defense personnel provided questions or intelligence to “liaison” agencies (chiefly the CIA) after they knew, or suspected, detainees were being mistreated; in 2 cases U.K. personnel were directly involved in mistreatment, in 4 cases they threatened it; there were 13 incidents where U.K. officials witnessed at first hand a detainee being mistreated; 128 cases where U.K. officers were told of mistreatment by foreign services and did nothing; 198 cases where the U.K. received intelligence from liaison services who had used mistreatment; 38 cases in 2002 alone where officers witnessed or heard about mistreatment. As for rendition: in 28 cases the U.K. suggested, planned or agreed to rendition, a further 22 cases where it enabled it and 23 cases where the U.K. failed to prevent it.

Had the U.K. not been completely absorbed by the Brexit process, this extremely important report would have had much more attention than the limited publicity it got in June. It is highly likely that the Foreign Secretary, for much of the time, Jack Straw would have been asked to submit to a judicial investigation over his claims that he had not authorized rendition and knew nothing about it (a claim that was as incredible then as it is now).

At least three intelligence heads, Sir Richard Dearlove (chief or ‘C’ of MI6, 1999-2004), Sir Stephen Lander (director general of MI5, 1999-2002), and Baroness Eliza Manningham-Buller (director general 2002-2007) would have been required to face a similar inquiry had this ISC report not slipped under the radar because of the Brexit chaos. Two further ex-intelligence chiefs, Sir John Sawers and Lord (Jonathan) Evans, representing MI6 and MI5, would also have been called to account in view of their misleading statements made in 2010. Lord Evans had publicly declared that “in 2005 and 2007 we did not practice torture, nor do we collude in torture or encourage others to do so on our behalf.” Sir John had said, also in public, that “torture is illegal and abhorrent and we have nothing whatsoever to do with it.”

Of course, one could enter into a ridiculously contrived debate as to whether “mistreatment” was “torture” and whether Evans and Sir John were simply saying “we didn’t do it in 2005 and 2007, don’t do it now, but did do it in 2003, 2004 and 2006.” But engaging in such sophistry does little to encourage the thinking public to have confidence in any secret activity done its name.

Yes, in January 2002 the White House lawyer John Yoo argued that to “inflict pain up to the level of organ failure but not beyond it” did not constitute torture. Yoo’s definition of what was and was not torture remains offensive to all decent people everywhere but not, it seems within British intelligence circles hence the denial that the U.K. had been complicit in it.

The definition allowed both waterboarding and other physical and mental abuse of horrific proportions to take place. For example, CIA’s first detainee Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded 83 times and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, one of the alleged 9/11 co-conspirators, 183 times. Sexual degradation and the use of dogs to terrify detainees was repeatedly used by U.S. captors in the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. All this is torture. End of story.

Why does this issue matter? No one has any sympathy for any Islamist terrorist, whether in 2001 or 2018. But that is not the point. There are three vital reasons why the ISC report deserves deep attention. First of all, the institutional use of violence to obtain intelligence is what the adversaries of free democracies do and have done, from ISIS to the Soviet Union and in particular the Third Reich. It is the opposite of the values for which we stand and as such legitimizes our actions against states that institutionalize torture. It is an absolutely key issue. With the election of President Donald J. Trump, the U.S. again has a president who believes that torture works. With Brexit pushing the U.K. closer to the U.S., this complicity in torture could easily be repeated.

Second, the misleading statements by former Foreign Secretary Straw and others raise profound questions about how those outside the “ring of secrecy,” not least academic students of intelligence and security questions, may understand and analyze secret activity and communicate it to a wider public. If we are misled, the consequences are very grave indeed.

And thirdly, it is clear that we cannot entirely rely on the U.K.’s elaborate oversight body to do its work properly. One very distressing detail in its report reads as follows: “We needed to examine certain matters [relating to mistreatment] by taking evidence [from officers]. We have been denied that access by the Prime Minister.” Theresa May’s decision is hard to understand. She is fully able to trust the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) because it operates within the ring of secrecy (under section 1(1)(b) of the 1989 Official Secrets Act).

It has a statutory duty to monitor and investigate the security secrets of the British state, where it seeks to deliver security through secret intelligence-led means. The ISC would never disclose any operational secrets, but it could inform the public about ethical and operation wrongdoing in the past. That it should be denied permission to tell the full story is disgraceful and almost certainly unconstitutional.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share7Tweet
Anthony Glees

Anthony Glees

Professor of Politics and Director of the Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies at the University of Buckingham

Related Posts

A supporter of nurses' strike and NHS holds a placard
World

UK Faces Fresh Mass Strikes as Wage Talks Derail

by Staff Writer
February 1, 2023
UK immigrant protest
Refugees

UK Vows ‘More Radical’ Measures to Tackle Illegal Migration

by Staff Writer
November 1, 2022
Rishi Sunak
Featured

‘Full Circle’: Sunak’s Roots a Point of Pride for Indians

by Staff Writer
October 25, 2022
UK channel migrants
Refugees

More Migrants Cross Channel So Far This Year Than Whole of 2021

by Staff Writer
September 13, 2022
Queen Elizabeth II
World

World Briefly Unites to Mourn ‘Elizabeth the Steadfast’

by Staff Writer
September 9, 2022
Shell
Environment

Greenpeace Sues UK Government Over Shell Gas Field

by Staff Writer
July 27, 2022
Next Post
physician-assisted suicide protest outside supreme court

Dying With Dignity: A Glimpse at Physician-Assisted Suicide in America

mark zuckerberg

Facebook Shares Plunge After Weak User Growth Report

Recommended

Damage from a series of powerful storms and at least one tornado is seen on March 25, 2023, in Rolling Fork, Mississippi

After Tornado Kills 25, Mississippi Faces More Extreme Weather

March 26, 2023
Transgender Army veteran Tanya Walker speaks to protesters in Times Square near a military recruitment centre

Tennessee Is A Drag on the First Amendment

March 26, 2023
participants of an artificial intelligence conference

How AI Could Upend the World Even More Than Electricity or the Internet

March 19, 2023
Chinese President Xi Jinping

China’s Path to Economic Dominance

March 15, 2023
Heavily armed police inspect the area near a Jehovah's Witness church where several people have been killed in a shooting in Hamburg, northern Germany

Eight Dead in Shooting at Jehovah’s Witness Hall in Germany

March 10, 2023
Myanmar Rohingya refugees look on in a refugee camp in Teknaf, in Bangladesh's Cox's Bazar, on November 26, 2016

US Announces $26M in New Aid for Rohingya

March 8, 2023

Opinion

Transgender Army veteran Tanya Walker speaks to protesters in Times Square near a military recruitment centre

Tennessee Is A Drag on the First Amendment

March 26, 2023
Chinese President Xi Jinping

China’s Path to Economic Dominance

March 15, 2023
An earthquake survivor reacts as rescuers look for victims and other survivors in Hatay, a Turkish province where hundreds of buildings were destroyed by the earthquake

Heed the Call of Our Broken World

March 1, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives

‘Cringy Awards:’ Who Is the Most Embarrassing US House Representative?

February 13, 2023
Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post