• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Saturday, July 12, 2025
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Another Strategic Mistake in Afghanistan Peace Process: Omitting Local Actors

Mohammad Jawad Ali Aqa by Mohammad Jawad Ali Aqa
11/19/18
in Opinion
Taliban fighters with their weapons in Afghanistan

Taliban fighters. Photo: AFP

327
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In the past, Afghan-American novelist Khaled Hosseini’s account of Kabul as having nights with a shimmering moon and days with a thousand splendid suns was accurate. These days, however, Afghanistan’s capital is more the city of a “thousand tragedies per square mile.” It is a place of vicious politics where citizens question why they themselves are the ones paying the price.

It was therefore not a midnight party that led people to pour into streets of Kabul two Sundays ago. For the citizens, who live their days and nights under the shadow of death and terror, gathering in a large crowd would be the last thing to do. On November 11, it was the ongoing destruction that made the residents come out of their houses. At midnight, dozens of men and women had gathered around the presidential palace, protesting and demanding President Mohammad Ashraf Ghani to order an air strike against the Taliban who had raided their villages in the Jaghuri, Malistan, and Uruzgani-Khas districts of central Afghanistan. Yet, at the climax of recent fear, Donald J. Trump’s administration has announced a plan to directly sit in peace talks with the Taliban.

Afghanistan’s Political Landscape

In Afghan politics, there are many antagonistic actors – liberal, illiberal, national, regional, and international – defenseless locals, and brutal non-state militants who since 2001 have all been trying to occupy the same space. This adversarial interaction of various groups and mostly incompatible, competing political actors, has complicated the Afghan conflict. The cost of this interaction has been huge, as about 104,000 people have been killed since 2001, including no less than 31,000 civilians.

On one side of this bloody conflict are the U.S. and other external actors who have intervened in the country, promising to defeat the Taliban and bring peace. After 17 years of the costly war on terror, the U.S. rhetoric has clearly shifted. It now seems that the U.S. is trying to put the ball in the Taliban’s court – the very same group that President George W. Bush had called “evil-doers” and had vowed to get rid of.

Direct Peace Talks with Taliban

The recently announced willingness of the Trump administration to talk directly with the Taliban indicates a shift in the U.S. policy. However, the Taliban does not seem to demand anything less than the entire withdrawal of foreign troops. Negotiating directly with the Taliban, but in the absence of the Afghan government and other local actors like major ethnic and religious minorities, seems to be another strategic mistake for a number of reasons.

First, the battle in Afghanistan is fought between many actors. This means it can’t be solved through negotiations of just the U.S. and the Taliban. A record 92 percent of Afghans prefer the current government over the Taliban. Co-opting with the Taliban would be a serious challenge, as the group has announced they are willing to talk directly with the U.S. but also explicitly declared that they will not engage in peace talks with the Afghan government.

The Taliban is despised by many local stakeholders. The Hazara ethnic group claims the Taliban is after their genocide while the Tajik and Uzbek ethnic groups equally despise the Taliban. For peace talks to be durable, every stakeholder of the Afghan conflict should be involved, including the country’s minorities. The absence of minorities is likely to deepen the ethnic division further and potentially kick off another sectarian war.

Second, Taliban militia has overtly demonstrated their antagonism towards minorities in Afghanistan. Just recently, the Taliban raided three locations in the central districts of Jaghuri, Urozgan, and Malistan. These three districts are mainly populated by the Hazara minority ethnic group who have been historically persecuted by the Taliban. The Taliban’s antagonism is not only with the Hazara ethnic minority, as other ethnic minorities also resent the Taliban. It is questionable if engaging in peace talks with an organization that is so openly against minorities will lead to durable peace.

Finally, giving the militant Taliban a say in the so-called liberal Afghan government would only result in permanently institutionalizing their militant ideology. Other, more radical actors such as warlords still maintain public support and remain active in Afghanistan. Accepting the Taliban to be part of the government would send a clear message to these warlords and their supporters that bullets are more effective than ballots in Afghanistan.

Local Dynamics

Meaningful peace talks can only happen if the Taliban accepts the current Afghan constitution. The Taliban is still widely feared, particularly by minorities and Afghan women. Thus, opening a venue of trust among all the stakeholders at the local level could only happen if the Taliban accepts the constitution as a guarantor to address the concerns of other stakeholders.

The relations in Afghanistan are complicated and the Taliban is not the only local actor. Therefore, implementing a top-down approach in any peace-building effort in Afghanistan would be a serious mistake.

Instead, a combination of top-down (U.S. support) and bottom-up approach through local level initiatives should be undertaken in tandem. It is imperative that the United States and Afghan government must consider the dynamics at the local level including all affected ethnic and religious minorities if this protracted Afghan war has any hope of being resolved. The Afghan government and local stakeholders must take the lead in peace-talks to earn support, legitimacy, and trust at the local level.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share327Tweet
Mohammad Jawad Ali Aqa

Mohammad Jawad Ali Aqa

Graduate student at Tokyo University of Foreign studies. Researcher on peacebuilding, state-building, and contentious politics

Related Posts

Donald Trump
Opinion

Fact vs. Fiction: The Trump Administration’s Dubious War on Reverse Discrimination

by Kevin Cokley
June 18, 2025
A Black Lives Matter mural in New York City.
Opinion

Fuhgeddaboudit! America’s Erasure of History

by Stephen J. Lyons
April 2, 2025
President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky shake hands during a meeting in New York on September 25, 2019
World

Zelensky Says ‘Unpredictable’ Trump Could Help End War

by Staff Writer with AFP
January 2, 2025
US President Donald Trump inspects border wall prototypes
National

Trump Confirms Plan to Use Military for Mass Deportation

by Staff Writer with AFP
November 18, 2024
US President Donald Trump displays a sign saying 'Trump digs coal' during a rally.
National

Gore Says Climate Progress ‘Won’t Slow Much’ Because of Trump

by Staff Writer with AFP
November 26, 2024
Putin talks to Trump in Hamburg
Opinion

From Roosevelt to Trump: The Complicated Legacy of Personal Diplomacy

by Tizoc Chavez
November 15, 2024
Next Post
Thousands of students and civilians staged sit-in at the heart of the Hong Kong Island for 79 days during the 2014 Umbrella Movement.

Hong Kong Democracy Leaders Plead Not Guilty in Umbrella Movement Trial

A displaced Iraqi family

Vulnerable Children in Iraq Most Likely to Fall Behind, UNICEF Warns

Recommended

UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese

UN Says US Sanctions on Expert Sets ‘Dangerous Precedent,’ Must Be Reversed

July 11, 2025
Women in Afghanistan wearing a blue burqa

ICC Seeks Arrest of Taliban Leaders Over Persecution of Women

July 9, 2025
Kenya, Nairobi, 2024-07-16. Protesters in the streets

Nairobi Tense as Kenya Marks Democracy Uprising

July 7, 2025
President Donald Trump

Trump Wins ‘Phenomenal’ Victory as Congress Passes Flagship Bill

July 4, 2025
University students march in protest towards the Istanbul Municipality in Sarachane as they demonstrate against the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu in Istanbul, Turkey, on March 21, 2025.

‘Remember Charlie Hebdo!’ Protesters Seethe at Istanbul Magazine

July 2, 2025
US President Donald Trump

US Senate Edges Towards Vote on Trump’s Divisive Spending Bill

June 30, 2025

Opinion

Donald Trump

Fact vs. Fiction: The Trump Administration’s Dubious War on Reverse Discrimination

June 18, 2025
Tens of thousands of protestors shut down Fifth Avenue in Manhattan on Saturday, April 5, 2025, protesting the Trump administration's abuse of the separation of federal powers as well as the deep cuts to governmental services overseen by presidential advisor Elon Musk.

Civil Society Is Holding the Line. Will Washington Notice?

June 17, 2025
A Black Lives Matter mural in New York City.

Fuhgeddaboudit! America’s Erasure of History

April 2, 2025
Bust of Deputy Rubens Paiva in the Chamber of Deputies

Democratic Brazilians Are Still Here

March 18, 2025
A woman from Guatemala

Dispatch From Central America

January 28, 2025
US President Donald Trump

Dear Trump Supporters: Is This the America You Wanted?

January 28, 2025
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post