• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Friday, February 15, 2019
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Editing a Baby’s Genes is Premature, Irresponsible, and Dangerous

Joyce Harper by Joyce Harper
December 7, 2018
in Opinion
Chinese scientist He Jiankui at the Human Genome Editing summit in Hong Kong

He Jiankui at the Human Genome Editing summit in Hong Kong. Photo: AFP

32
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Last week, the scientific community was stunned to hear that a Chinese scientist had transferred human embryos in which he had altered a gene to increase resistance to HIV and twins have been born. The news comes at a time that all the scientific reports about this method agree that we are a long way off from understanding the efficacy and safety of this procedure. Besides issues with the method of genome editing, this technology has potential implications for the society and health of our future offspring.

The Chinese scientist He Jiankui edited the DNA of seven embryos being used for fertility treatment, so far resulting in the birth of one set of twin girls, with an additional pregnancy due soon. He says he used the tool known as CRISPR to delete a small part of the embryos’ CCR5 gene, mutations in which are linked to resistance to HIV infection. Jiankui’s patients were HIV-positive men who had the infection under control and HIV-negative women. The risk of HIV transmission to their babies would have been negligible for these couples, and there are well-established ways to prevent HIV transmission to the offspring of HIV-positive couples.

Editing a human embryo and replacing it into a woman is premature, irresponsible, and dangerous on many levels. Currently, the studies on human embryo genome editing have shown that there are two issues. The first is off-target effects, where edits happen in other parts of the genome rather than just the gene that is hoping to be edited. The second is mosaicism which is when not all the cells of the embryo have the edit, which shows that the technique was not efficient.

So why did He Jiankui do it?

For some, there is the urge to be the first and be recorded in history. But the reports from the summit in Hong Kong where the announcement was made suggest that Jiankui was naive and maybe has not understood the current climate of human genome editing. When interviewed at the conference, his answers were brief.

Research and Public Debate

It is essential that research is undertaken to support the safety of human genome editing, but we also need to facilitate public debate. Many nations worldwide have been discussing the ethical and social implications of altering genes of our future children and how research should be conducted before the technique is deemed safe.

Rack with test tubes
Chinese scientist He Jiankui claims to have created the world’s first genetically edited babies. Photo: AFP

Human genetic research is developing at an incredible speed. In September 2016, I visited the newly opened China National Genebank in Shenzhen, a billion-dollar facility which aims to sequence millions of genomes and to resurrect the mammoth. I was therefore not surprised to hear that the claim for the first genome edited children came from Shenzhen. He Jiankui is currently on unpaid leave from the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen. The university stated that his conduct has seriously violated academic ethics and codes of conduct.

Should we Allow Genome Editing?

If genome editing is deemed safe at some point in the future, I predict that in most countries legislation would restrict its use to inherited genetic diseases or situations where there are no alternatives.

I was part of the genome editing working group at the Nuffield Council of Bioethics in the U.K., and after 20 months of research, we published our report in July 2018. We stated that before genome editing should be allowed, we need a broad societal debate to hear the public opinion. After that, we need clear legislation on when the technology should be allowed, but we also need robust studies to ensure that the procedure is safe and efficient.

We concluded that two overarching principles need to be considered: the welfare of the future person and that this technology should not increase disadvantage, discrimination, or division in society.

In February 2017, the report by the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine concluded that first peer-review preclinical research is required to establish the risks and benefits, which should be followed by clinical trials only for compelling medical reasons in the absence of alternative treatments. It laid out a regulatory framework that included ten recommended criteria.

The transfer of edited embryos is far too premature, and globally we need to rapidly develop governance to control the future use of this technology, both for the benefits of society and for any future children born from edited embryos.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share31Tweet1
Joyce Harper

Joyce Harper

Professor of Reproductive Science at the Institute for Women’s Health, University College London

Related Posts

A voter casts his ballot in the midterm election at a polling station in the Brooklyn borough of New York City on November 6, 2018
National

‘No Material Impact’ from Foreign Meddling in 2018 US Vote [Report]

by Staff Writer
February 5, 2019
Two men stand in front of a Huawei store in Beijing, China
Opinion

The Disingenuous Efforts of Barring Huawei

by Howard Yu
February 4, 2019
The Xinjiang region of China
Featured

Followed, Harassed: Foreign Reporters Say China Work Conditions Worsen

by Staff Writer
January 29, 2019
Meng Wanzhou Huawei
Business

Huawei Warns of Action Against Hostile Markets Amid Tensions

by Staff Writer
January 22, 2019
A Uighur vendor pushes his cart of watermelons past Chinese soldiers on patrol in Urumqi in northwest China's Xinjiang province
Opinion

Cultural Genocide in Xinjiang: How China Targets Uyghur Artists, Academics, and Writers

by Rachel Harris
January 17, 2019
Xi Jinping, president of China
Featured

China Sentences Canadian Drug Suspect to Death Amid Tensions

by Staff Writer
January 14, 2019
Next Post
Paris On Knife-Edge Ahead of New ‘Yellow Vest’ Protests

Paris On Knife-Edge Ahead of New 'Yellow Vest' Protests

Social media users

More Than Half of Global Population Now Online: UN

Recommended

Women with children in Syria's Rukban camp

Early Marriages, ‘Survival Sex’ Last Resort for Women in Syria’s Rukban

February 15, 2019
US President Donald Trump inspects border wall prototypes

US Judge Rules Against Butterfly Sanctuary Opposed to Trump’s Wall

February 15, 2019
A man at work in U.S. auto-manufacturing plant.

US Manufacturing Plunges Dramatically in January

February 15, 2019
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem on November 19, 2017

Israel Leaked Video of Gulf Ministers at Anti-Iran Meet [Reports]

February 15, 2019
Myanmar's Aung San Suu Kyi

Myanmar’s Leading Lady: The Deification of Aung San Suu Kyi

February 15, 2019
us capitol building

New Law Could Make US Government Data Much More Useful

February 14, 2019

Opinion

Myanmar's Aung San Suu Kyi

Myanmar’s Leading Lady: The Deification of Aung San Suu Kyi

February 15, 2019
Rescued Cameroonian migrant Josepha, 40-years-old, rests on board the Spanish NGO Proactiva Open Arms boat as it sails back to Spain in the Mediterranean Sea on July 17, 2018

Migrant Containment at all Costs: What is Left of European Humanity?

February 14, 2019
People scavenging for food in the streets of Venezeula's capital Caracas

Regime Change is Only Way to Save 32 Million Venezuelans from Downright Starvation

February 14, 2019
Rohingya Urgently Need Relief, but is World Willing to Make an Effort?

Rohingya Urgently Need Relief, but is World Willing to Make an Effort?

February 13, 2019
People in traditional dress arrive to vote in the Mongolia's presidential election of 2017

What’s Next for Mongolia’s Troubled Oasis of Democracy?

February 13, 2019
An Armenian man holds a placard reading "Hands off Karabakh" during a rally in Yerevan in 2016

Recent Optimism for Solution in Frozen Conflict Between Armenia and Azerbaijan is Misplaced

February 12, 2019
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post