• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Friday, January 15, 2021
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Democracy at Risk

Indian Government Under Fire After Controversial New Surveillance Order

Gowhar Geelani by Gowhar Geelani
01/03/19
in Democracy at Risk, Featured, World
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi

India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Photo: AFP

76
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The federal government in New Delhi has come under fire from opposition parties and rights groups after issuing a controversial order on December 20 granting itself sweeping surveillance powers.

The order, issued by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s Ministry of Home Affairs, has stirred a political hornet’s nest in India while many rights activists ask whether India is turning into a “surveillance state.”

Ten of the country’s intelligence agencies have been granted power to intercept and monitor data, both in motion or stored in computers, and even seize devices.

The agencies have the powers of “interception, monitoring and decryption of any information generated, transmitted, received or stored in any computer,” according to the order issued by India’s Home Secretary, Rajiv Gauba.   

In a strongly-worded tweet, the head of Congress Rahul Gandhi called Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi an “insecure dictator.”

Converting India into a police state isn’t going to solve your problems, Modi Ji.

It’s only going to prove to over 1 billion Indians, what an insecure dictator you really are. https://t.co/KJhvQqwIV7

— Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) December 21, 2018

After Gandhi’s tweet, the political heat picked up pace over the federal government’s order on snooping of personal computers, laptops, tablets, and mobile devices of Indian citizens.

The government of India also plans to get access to encrypted data on the popular messaging app, Whatsapp.

According to the order issued under Section 69(1) of the Information Technology Act of 2000, the service provider, subscriber or person in charge of a computer device is bound to cooperate and extend all technical assistance to the intelligence, spy and security agencies.

Anyone who refuses to cooperate will have to face the law. Non-compliance can lead to imprisonment which may extend to seven years.   

The latest MHA order gives that power to the Intelligence Bureau, Narcotics Control Bureau, Enforcement Directorate, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Central Bureau of Investigation, National Investigation Agency, Cabinet Secretariat, Directorate of Signal Intelligence (in Jammu and Kashmir, North-East and Assam only) and the Delhi Police Commissioner.


‘Orwell is Around the Corner’

India’s top spy and security agencies including the RA&W, CBI, IB and NIA are authorized to monitor not just calls or emails, but any data found on a computer, with the permission of India’s home secretary.

P Chidambaram, a senior Congressional leader and India’s former minister for home and finance drew comparisons to George Orwell’s famous dystopian novel, “1984.”

“If anybody is going to monitor the computer, including your computer, that is the Orwellian state. George Orwell is around the corner. It is condemnable.”

Speaking exclusively to The Globe Post, Salman Soz, another Congress leader, economist and his party’s spokesperson, said that “The Modi government has a record of elevating the state above the citizenry.”

“Be it this recent order seeking to obliterate citizens’ privacy rights or the draconian demonetization that damaged economic rights and interests of Indians, Modi’s politics is about the government’s commanding heights, with him on top,” Soz argued.

“As with other strongmen, there is an element of paranoia that makes everyone a suspect unless proven otherwise. Recent election defeats … for Modi’s political party will add fuel to this fire as we get closer to the 2019 parliamentary elections.”

Predictably, many prominent human rights defenders are angry over the new order. They are describing the order as an attack on individual privacy and a brazen attempt to stifle dissent and free speech.


Kashmir Targeted

Khurram Parvez, chairperson at Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances and a well-known rights activist, told The Globe Post that “sooner or later these tactics, which infringe upon the right to privacy and dignity of people used by Indian state in Kashmir, will be implemented against all the voices of dissent even within India.”

Pakistan and India claim the disputed Himalayan region of Jammu and Kashmir in full, but administer it in parts since the partition.

In his additional capacity as program coordinator at Jammu and Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society, Parvez further said the people of Kashmir have become desensitized to rights violations.

“The snooping by Indian intelligence and police is an old phenomenon faced by people of Kashmir and now it no more invites outrage from Kashmiris for they have got accustomed to it,” he said.

He is not off the mark in his assessment.

On December 21, the police in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir admitted to the Srinagar-based English newspaper, Greater Kashmir, that “there is nothing new” in the MHA guidelines because “such an exercise is already in vogue since 2000” in the disputed region.

Importantly, the top spy agencies will also have powers to seize the devices, in the name of “national security.” 


‘Snoopendra Logs In’

Meanwhile, the Communist Party of India in its official statement termed the new MHA directive “an unconstitutional order.”

“This is a brazen attack on the fundamental right to privacy given to every citizen by our Constitution,” a statement issued by the CPI said.

Sitaram Yechury, one of India’s prominent leftist leaders and a member of the CPI, demanded that the Modi government should immediately rescind the order.

“The common Indian is squeezed in every possible way by this thoughtless, callous and brazen government that only serves its cronies and masters at Nagpur,” Yechuri wrote, referencing the headquarters of the Hindu right-wing Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.

Apart from politicians and rights activists, some top newspapers also reacted sharply against the MHA decree.

For instance, The Telegraph, one of India’s popular newspapers based in Calcutta in the eastern state of West Bengal that has a reputation for writing catchy headlines, took a dig at Modi with the publication’s main headline on December 22: “Snoopendra logs in.”

In its defense, the ruling Hindu nationalist BJP said that the government was securing its national interest and that there was nothing new in the order that did not exist before.

Khalid Jehangir, a young BJP spokesperson, said that India’s National Security Advisor Ajit Doval was securing the country’s national interest.

“The [National Security Adviser] is only securing the country’s national interest. If something is needed to secure national interest it has to be done. But as far as Jammu and Kashmir is concerned there is nothing new,” Jehangir told The Globe Post.

After the uproar and stiff opposition from the Congress party, communist parties and human rights defenders and activists, the MHA issued a clarification on 21 December.

“The Statutory order (S.O) dated [December 12] has been issued in accordance with rules framed in year 2009 and in vogue since then,” the MHA said in a statement, adding that “No new powers have been conferred to any of the security or law enforcement agencies.”

On December 24, a public interest litigation was filed in the Supreme Court of India to challenge the government’s new snooping law.

“The blanket surveillance order must be tested against the fundamental right to privacy,” the petition said.


More on the Subject

Governments worldwide are stepping up the use of online tools, in many cases inspired by China’s model, to suppress dissent and tighten their grip on power, a human rights watchdog study found in November.

The annual Freedom House study of 65 countries found global internet freedom declined for the eighth consecutive year in 2018, amid a rise in what the group called “digital authoritarianism.”

The Freedom on the Net 2018 report found online propaganda and disinformation have increasingly “poisoned” the digital space, while the unbridled collection of personal data is infringing on privacy.

Chinese-Style ‘Digital Authoritarianism’ Grows Globally [Study]

 

Share76Tweet
Gowhar Geelani

Gowhar Geelani

Related Posts

Rescue workers search for survivors in the debris of a collapsed building in Mahad, India on Tuesday. AFP
World

‘Like a House of Cards:’ Building Collapses in India, Killing 11

by Anya Ruppert
August 26, 2020
A woman holds a sign during a rally to mark Juneteenth on June 19, 2020, in San Francisco
Opinion

India’s Caste System Is Criticized but America’s Class System Is No Better

by Priya Harindranathan
August 21, 2020
Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan speaks at a rally in Muzaffarabad on September 13, 2019. Photo: Aamir Qureshi/AFP.
World

Pakistan PM Khan Slams ‘Oppressor’ India on Kashmir Anniversary

by Staff Writer
August 5, 2020
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi gestures during his victory speech at the BJP headquarters in New Delhi
Opinion

India and Pakistan’s Divergent Political Paths Are Converging

by Saad Hafiz
August 4, 2020
A woman checks her phone as she shelters under an umbrella in the rain on Oxford Street in London on June 18, 2020, as some non-essential retailers reopen from their coronavirus shutdown.
Opinion

Tech’s Dominant Power Undermines Our Human Right to Privacy

by Michael Kleinman
July 28, 2020
Indians wear face masks
World

Delhi Virus Cases Dip but More Indian States Lock Down

by Staff Writer
July 22, 2020
Next Post
Women gender violence Spain

Spain Moves to Extend Statute of Limitations for Child Abuse

A demonstrator dressed as Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (C) with blood on his hands protests outside the Saudi embassy in Washington, DC after Khashoggi went missing.

This Year Wasn't Good for Journalists. Will 2019 Be Better?

Recommended

The filing was submitted by Justice Department lawyers on Thursday, January 14.

US Rioters Sought to ‘Capture and Assassinate’ Lawmakers at Capitol: Prosecutors

January 15, 2021
Biden proposes raising the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour.

Biden Unveils $1.9 Tn Economic Plan as US Recovery Buckles

January 14, 2021
Senegalese soldiers from the UN peacekeeping mission in Mali, MINUSMA, July 24, 2019.

UN Peacekeeper Killed in Mali, Seven Wounded: Spokesman

January 13, 2021
President Donald Trump in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House.

Threatening Democracy: The Choice Between Progress and Extremism Has Never Been So Clear

January 13, 2021
Jake Angeli speaks to a US Capitol Police officer.

American Democracy Will Prevail

January 13, 2021
People march against climate change in Bordeaux, southwestern France, on October 13, 2018.

NGOs Accuse France of Climate Inaction in Landmark Court Case

January 13, 2021

Opinion

President Donald Trump in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House.

Threatening Democracy: The Choice Between Progress and Extremism Has Never Been So Clear

January 13, 2021
Jake Angeli speaks to a US Capitol Police officer.

American Democracy Will Prevail

January 13, 2021
Pro-Trump protester in front of Capitol Hill.

Riots at Capitol Hill: Darkness Before the Dawn?

January 8, 2021
Volunteers are given the Moderna vaccine on August 5, 2020, in Detroit, Michigan.

Who’s First-in-Line for the Vaccine? A Classic Problem in Medical Ethics

December 30, 2020
A sorghum farmer inspects her small grains crop thriving in the dry conditions in March in the Mutoko rural area of Zimbabwe

The 10-Year Food Systems Revolution Must Start Now

December 22, 2020
Playing the Un-Naming Game in New York Is Harder Than It Seems

Pandenomics: The High Cost of Living While Undocumented in the United States

December 22, 2020
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post