• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Monday, July 4, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Spain’s Trial of the Century: Consequences of Attempted ‘Fake’ Catalan Secession

Andrew Dowling by Andrew Dowling
01/16/19
in Opinion
A person waves a Catalan pro-independence flag in front of the 'Generalitat' palace (Catalan government headquarters) in Barcelona, Spain

A person waves a Catalan flag in front of the Catalan government headquarters in Barcelona. Photo: AFP

97
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Later this month, Madrid’s Supreme Court will be the setting in for Spain’s, and in some senses Europe’s, trial of the century. Those appearing are nine former holders of office of the Catalan regional government and parliament, which was in power between January 2016 and December 2017.

They are charged with having organized, over a number of years, a rebellion against the Spanish Constitution of 1978 with the aim of achieving independence of Catalonia.

People wave pro-independence Catalan flags 'Esteladas' while holding letters reading 'independence' during a pro-independence demonstration in Barcelona, Spain
On September 11, around one million Catalans rallied in Barcelona in a show of support for independence nearly a year after a failed attempt to break away from Spain. Photo: AFP

Not since the 1970 Burgos trial of the Basque revolutionary organization ETA, under Francisco Franco’s regime, has Spanish justice been under such an international spotlight. The independence of Spain’s judiciary and the effective functioning of its internal democratic mechanisms will all be under close scrutiny.

Credibility of Spanish Justice

The credibility of Spanish justice has fallen greatly over the past decade and can be traced to the capacity of Spain’s two main political parties – conservatives and social democrats – to make legal appointments based on political loyalty.

Whoever controls the legislature determines judicial nominations. This system functioned without major questioning after the restoration of Spanish democracy and was used to control judges whose democratic credentials were lacking, having been trained under the Franco dictatorship. The long-lasting Franco dictatorship (1939 – 1975) constructed its own legal system and judges were required to be loyal to the regime.

From the mid-1990s, however, a neo-conservative right used their parliamentary power to appoint not just conservative judges but those who were politically loyal. The economic crisis after 2008 brought party political influence of the judiciary under greater scrutiny and questioning.

Once Spain’s two major parties no longer controlled even half of the parliamentary vote, their controlling practices in the legal system were increasingly challenged. Now the impartiality of the highest judges is profoundly questioned.

As in most West European societies, judges tend to be conservative custodians of property, the privileged, and the state, and it is in the latter area and territorial integrity that the upcoming Catalan trial should be situated.

Catalonia’s Succession

The evidence currently in the public domain is that the attempted secession of Catalonia was, in fact, little beyond a political class being trapped by their own public rhetoric and promises.

The Catalan parliament declared independence on October 27, 2017, yet within 48 hours, many of the main leaders had fled the country. More than one year later not one country in the world has recognized the Catalan declaration or shows an indication of doing so. This can at least be partly explained by the fact that those who made the declaration did not even believe in it.

This is the great paradox of the upcoming trial. The pro-independence Catalan leaders are being tried not only on the basis of a fake secession but are being accused of the most serious charges including rebellion. One way of interpreting this apparent paradox is to note that, while the Catalan independence leaders were bluffing, the authorities of the Spanish state were not.

Referendum and Police Violence

The attempted fake secession was a mechanism to force the Spanish government to the negotiating table, which it had resisted since 2012. This however backfired with an attempted self-organized pseudo-referendum on October 1, 2017, being met with fierce scenes of police violence.

This brought great international attention to Catalonia and the actions of the Spanish government. The nationally televised address by the Spanish King Felipe VI on October 3, 2017, linked together the institutions of the state in a full-throated defense of the existing constitutional order constructed in the late 1970s.

No apology was made for the police violence. The highest judicial authorities in Madrid and Barcelona followed the king’s lead and began to compile material to ensure exemplary punishment for those Catalan leaders who had tarnished the name of Spain internationally.

Unexpected Charges

Carles Puigdemont, president of Catalonia
Catalan President Carles Puigdemont in 2016. Photo: Generalitat de Catalunya

The leaders of the Catalan independence movement had anticipated fines and disbarment from office as a consequence of their actions (further confirmation that the supposed secession was not meant to be in any way real). What the pro-independence leadership had not expected was lengthy pre-trial detention and the severest of charges against them. These included some of the most serious charges including sedition and organized rebellion against the Spanish Constitution of 1978, with the potential of prison terms of up to 30 years.

The trials that are expected to begin in late January will last for months and will be broadcasted live. In a Europe continuing to be affected by the shock waves of the economic crisis, the trials of the Catalan leadership will put a whole range of questions on the agenda.

Under what circumstances is the separation of a territory permitted? Does a strong minority (Catalan independence won 47.5 percent of the vote in 2015) have any right to secession? Where does political authority lie? How do we define the separation of powers when there is evident political interference?

In a Europe already dealing with Brexit and the growth of rightist populism, Spain’s trial of the century will further add these questions into the mix.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share97Tweet
Andrew Dowling

Andrew Dowling

Senior Lecturer in Catalan and Spanish History at Cardiff University in Wales. Author of 'The Rise of Catalan Independence: Spain's Territorial Crisis,' Routledge, 2017

Related Posts

Spain migrants
Refugees

Spain Prosecutor Opens Probe Into Melilla Migrant Deaths

by Staff Writer
June 28, 2022
Samuel Luiz
World

Two More Suspects Arrested Over Killing of Gay Man in Spain

by Staff Writer
July 9, 2021
Catalan students hold a banner reading "For an education to serve the Catalan people".
Opinion

‘Enough Is Enough:’ Ideological Harassment in Catalan Universities

by Carlos Conde Solares
September 4, 2020
Carrie Lam press conference in Hong Kong
World

Hong Kong Reimposes Social Distancing as Global Cases Continue to Rise

by Alexandra Marquez
July 14, 2020
People wave pro-independence Catalan flags 'Esteladas' while holding letters reading 'independence' during a pro-independence demonstration in Barcelona, Spain
Featured

Spain’s New Government to Tackle Catalonia via Negotiation

by Staff Writer
January 13, 2020
Women hold Spanish, Catalan, and European flags during a demonstration against Catalonia's independence in front of the European Parliament building in Strasbourg
Opinion

Playing with Fire: EU Must Be Careful of Fanning Euroscepticism in Spain

by Ojel L. Rodriguez
January 7, 2020
Next Post
US Special Envoy for Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad.

Since Khalilzad, US Peace Attempts in Afghanistan Have Been More Damaging than Winsome

‘It is Better to Die Here than in Myanmar:’ Rohingya Struggle to Avoid Deportation from India

Rohingya Exodus from India to Bangladesh Hits 1,300

Recommended

Shireen Abu Akleh

US Says Al Jazeera Journalist Likely Shot by Israel But Not Intentionally

July 4, 2022
Google logo

Google to Pay $90 Mn in Settlement With App Developers

July 1, 2022
Mexico murdered journalists

Journalist Murdered in Mexico, 12th This Year

June 29, 2022
Spain migrants

Spain Prosecutor Opens Probe Into Melilla Migrant Deaths

June 28, 2022
Afghan refugees

Pakistani Migrants in Afghanistan Caught in Quake No-Man’s Land

June 27, 2022
Joe Biden climate summit

Biden Calls Clean Energy Matter of National Security in Face of Russia War

June 17, 2022

Opinion

US President Donald Trump

Owning the Words and the Libs

June 16, 2022
Officers in Uvalde, Texas, stand outside Robb Elementary School near a makeshift memorial for the shooting victims

Child Sacrifice Makes a Comeback

June 3, 2022
A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Ukraine war

The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Hierarchies of Western Compassion

April 20, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post