• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Thursday, January 26, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

US Peace Envoy to Afghanistan Must Stop Admiring Taliban to Succeed in Mission

Mohammad Naser Sidiqee by Mohammad Naser Sidiqee
04/08/19
in Opinion
US Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad

US Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad. Photo: AFP

70
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Over the last couple of weeks, the Afghan government and E.U. officials have been scrambling to de-escalating tensions between U.S. Peace Envoy to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad and Afghan National Security Advisor Hamdullah Mohib.

The diplomatic row erupted on March 14, when Mohib harshly, and rightly so, criticized Khalilzad for failing to bring the Afghan government to negotiate with the Taliban.

Since Khalilzad took on his assignment as the U.S. special envoy in September, he has met Taliban representatives five times. The last meeting continued for sixteen days without any significant breakthrough for the Afghan people and government who are eagerly waiting for tangible outcomes.

When Khalilzad met Taliban representatives face-to-face for the first time in October, he had already gotten off on the wrong foot as no Afghan government officials had any prior knowledge of his plans. The irony is that the U.S. officials and Taliban representatives had met four times before Khalilzad’s mission, but the Afghan government was kept in the loop despite U.S. and Afghan officials not publicly acknowledging these meetings.

Khalilzad’s Approach to Afghan Peace

Optimism created by Donald J. Trump administration’s push to manufacture an Afghan “peace process” well ahead of the next U.S. presidential elections is slowly but surely waning, and the hopes of the Afghan people are on the brink of collapse. It appears that Trump is planning to contest the next U.S. presidential elections with a “mission accomplished” tag on Afghanistan.

I inherited a total mess in Syria and Afghanistan, the “Endless Wars” of unlimited spending and death. During my campaign I said, very strongly, that these wars must finally end. We spend $50 Billion a year in Afghanistan and have hit them so hard that we are now talking peace…

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 1, 2019

Given Khalilzad deep-seated reputation of often acting like a “viceroy” and coercing and intimidating Afghan politicians into involuntary actions, the decision to pick him as the U.S. peace envoy was a wrong one in the first place.

Khalilzad admitted in his memoir The Envoy how he played a deceptive game with Afghan politicians during the 2002 Emergency Grand Assembly (Loya Jirga) and lured the Resistance Front (often wrongly referred to as the Northern Alliance) into sacking Yunus Qanooni, the former speaker of the lower house and first vice president in Hamid Karzai’s administration.

Zalmay Khalilzad
Zalmay Khalilzad. Photo: Brendan Smialowski, AFP

During the 2009 presidential elections, Khalilzad was reported to have been harboring thoughts of running for Afghan president and negotiating with different power brokers to form an election ticket. Against this backdrop as well as under the current circumstances, the Afghan people and government officials have all the rights to remain distrustful of Khalilzad’s approach to peace.

His one-man show style of facilitating “Afghanistan reconciliation” has complicated things further and continues to upset the Afghan nation and officials. Since last week’s resumption of his “peace tour,” Khalilzad has not only left the Afghan government in the lurch but also didn’t miss any opportunity to disparage it further.

US-Owned and Led Afghan Peace Process

Since the outbreak of tensions between the U.S. peace envoy and Afghan officials, the two sides have continued to exchange diplomatic spats with Khalilzad seemingly siding with the Taliban, Afghanistan’s implacable enemy. Khalilzad’s intimidation tactics are focused on the Afghan government as opposed to the terrorists who he has been talking to.

In a recent interview, Khalilzad made fresh inroads on the Afghan government and loudly but wrongly accused it and other “elders of Afghanistan” of failing to form and introduce an “authoritative and inclusive” negotiation team for peace talks with the Taliban. By spreading disinformation about his diplomatic row with Afghan officials, Khalilzad is jeopardizing the U.S. efforts to not only end the 18-year war but also ensure viable peace.

During the interview, Khalilzad said:

“when I took on this assignment [as U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation] six months ago, I had two demands: one from the Taliban to form an authoritative negotiation team, and one from the Afghan government and other elders to form and introduce an authoritative as well as inclusive negotiation team.”

In what appears to be a serious memory lapse, Khalilzad fails to acknowledge that the Afghan government had already introduced a negotiation team and that it was Khalilzad himself who pulled the rug out from under its feet.

Khalilzad expressed warm admiration for the Taliban and how they responded to his demand by introducing an “authoritative negotiation team led by Mullah Baradar, one of the founders of the Taliban movement.” In his euphoric mood, Khalilzad overlooks the Taliban trickery. The Taliban have added Anas Haqqani, the Taliban-affiliated Haqqani network leader’s brother who is serving a death sentence in Afghanistan and waiting on death row since 2014, to the list of their 14-member “negotiating team.”

Taliban fighters with their weapons in Afghanistan
Taliban fighters. Photo: AFP

It is ridiculous and laughable at the same time that the Taliban would refuse to talk to the Afghan government but also expect it to free a terrorist who is consumed by pure hatred and fanaticism.

Is Khalilzad Glossing Over Actual Problems?

A review of international media outlets in general and U.S.-based media in particular reveals how they have opted for mounting pressure on the Afghan people and government when publishing about the U.S.-Taliban talks and building on a pro-Taliban narrative that simultaneously reinforces Khalilzad’s version of the story.

In consideration of the recent developments, the U.S. peace envoy has been sweeping his own defects under the rug.

First, Khalilzad has been overstating the Afghan government’s setbacks in building a national consensus and introducing an “inclusive” negotiating team, while he himself has failed to unify key international players such as Russia, Iran, and Pakistan.

In an Iran-based news agency’s article, senior Iranian officials expressed their deep concerns about what they called American attempts to “prevent [the] death of Salafi terrorism” and “strengthening ISIL in Afghanistan.” Khalilzad cannot just skip this issue and brag about having built a global consensus.

Pakistan's new prime minister Imran Khan
Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan. Photo: AFP

Second, just a week ago, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan’s reportedly suggested “establishing an interim government” in Afghanistan, creating a diplomatic rift between the two countries.

Khalilzad and the U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan John R. Bass tried to woo Khan on twitter for Pakistan’s constructive role in the Afghan peace process. However, their attempts to dissuade him from making such comments proved useless as the Pakistani prime minister reiterated his initial remarks while addressing a gathering near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. Khan clearly mocked the U.S. peace envoy, since, at the time of his remarks, Khalilzad was in Pakistan’s capital to discuss peace in Afghanistan.

Khalilzad has certainly left some stones unturned while trying to build regional and global consensus and, therefore, shouldn’t be very outspoken when criticizing the Afghan government for the difficulties it faces in trying to mobilize all political stakeholders.

In fact, Khalilzad has turned a blind eye to the Afghan government’s past and present efforts to create international and domestic consensus on how to end the conflict that has dragged on for four decades.

US-Afghanistan Rift

It is evident that the rift between Afghan and U.S. officials is affecting not only the U.S.-driven peace talks but also the Afghan people’s morale which can lead to an increasingly toxic environment and even counter-productive outcomes.

Hamdullah Mohib Afghanistan Afghan security forces Taliban civilian casualties
Afghanistan Ambassador to the US Hamdullah Mohib. Photo: The Globe Post

The clash between Khalilzad and Mohib calls for immediate and genuine effort from all sides in preventing peace endeavors from colliding with personal emotions.

Khalilzad must stop admiring the Taliban or else his approach will drive the nascent peace process right off the cliff. To do a great job, Khalilzad needs to focus on real risks, allow everyone to come up with alternatives, explore different directions, and ultimately make decisions that fulfill everyone’s expectations.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share70Tweet
Mohammad Naser Sidiqee

Mohammad Naser Sidiqee

Development practitioner, observer of Afghan political history and lecturer at Dunya University of Afghanistan

Related Posts

George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York
Opinion

George Santos for Speaker!

by Stephen J. Lyons
January 16, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives
National

Chaos as US House Adjourns Without Choosing Speaker

by Staff Writer
January 4, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines
Opinion

Eight Billion and Counting…

by Stephen J. Lyons
November 29, 2022
Taliban fighters
Featured

UN Expert Decries ‘Systematic’ Attacks on Afghan Shiites

by Staff Writer
September 12, 2022
US President Donald Trump
Opinion

Donald Trump Thanks You for Your Sacrifice

by Stephen J. Lyons
August 17, 2022
Protesters stand with placards in front of the statue of India's independence leader Mahatma Gandhi in Parliament Square, central London, after a demonstration outside the US Embassy
Featured

Considering the Patience of Gandhi for These Troubled Times

by Stephen J. Lyons
August 5, 2022
Next Post
the flag of France

France Jails Two 'Extremist' Vegans for Butcher Attacks

Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir

Women Take Leading Role in Sudan Protests

Recommended

The Doomsday Clock reads 100 seconds to midnight, a decision made by The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, during an announcement at the National Press Club in Washington, DC on January 23, 2020

‘Doomsday Clock’ Moves Closest Ever to Midnight

January 25, 2023
Police work near the scene of a mass shooting in Monterey Park, California

California Lunar New Year Mass Shooter Dead, Motive Unclear: Police

January 23, 2023
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

Race on To Replace Ardern as New Zealand Prime Minister

January 20, 2023
Pfizer logo and vaccines

Pfizer to Sell More Drugs at Cost to Poor Nations

January 18, 2023
Rescuers inspect the wreckage at the site of a Yeti Airlines plane crash in Pokhara, Nepal

At Least 67 Killed in Nepal Plane Crash

January 16, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023

Opinion

George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines

Eight Billion and Counting…

November 29, 2022
Mahsa Amini protests

Imagining a Free Iran

October 24, 2022
Vladimir Putin

How 18th Century International Law Clarifies the Situation in Ukraine

September 29, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Falling for Putin

September 15, 2022
US President Donald Trump

Donald Trump Thanks You for Your Sacrifice

August 17, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post