The European Court of Justice has thrown out a landmark case brought by 10 families who sued the European Union over the threats climate change poses to their homes and livelihoods, lawyers said Wednesday.
The team behind the case said the bloc’s top court earlier this month dismissed it on procedural grounds, arguing that individuals do not have the right to challenge the bloc’s environmental plans.
The ruling could have a major impact on future climate litigation, experts said.
Lawyers for the “People’s Climate Case” said they would appeal.
Families from across Europe, Kenya, and Fiji in May last year filed suit against the European Union, claiming it must do more to limit climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions and the droughts, floods, and sea level rises it brings.
The plaintiffs were “already being impacted by climate change, already incurring damage,” their lawyer Roda Verheyen told AFP at the time.
They include a Portuguese forester who had all his trees destroyed by wildfires in 2017 and a family from the Italian Alps which has seen the tourists their livelihoods depend on dwindle due to warmer winters.
Another complainant, Sanna Vannar, is a 23-year-old reindeer herder from Sweden’s indigenous Sami group.
“Since we launched the case, impacts of climate change got worse and worse,” she said Wednesday.
“This is not just a case. It is about protecting our rights and future.”
In their ruling on the ECJ’s website, the judges acknowledged that “every individual is likely to be affected one way or another by climate change.”
But it decided that this did not provide grounds for suing the E.U., which has already committed to reduce emissions.
This @exxonmobile chart from 1982 predicted that in 2019 our atmospheric CO2 level would reach about 415 parts per million, raising the global temperature roughly 0.9 degrees C.
Update: The world crossed the 415 ppm threshold this week and broke 0.9 degrees C in 2017 1/ pic.twitter.com/sLpOVkwzTF
— Tom Randall (@tsrandall) May 14, 2019
“The case is not dismissed on the merits,” said Verheyen in reaction to the ruling.
“On the contrary, the Court accepts that climate change is impacting everybody but refrains to engage with the facts of climate change and its human rights impacts.”
Hundreds of Cases
The Paris climate agreement, signed in 2015, commits to limiting global temperature rises to “well below” two degrees Celsius (3.7 Fahrenheit).
This would be achieved by a significant reduction in the use of fossil fuels that currently power the global economy.
The pact saw countries submit voluntary emissions-cutting pledges but experts say it is still more likely the Earth will warm by closer to 3.0 C – a level which could bring even more super-storms, forest fires and mass displacements similar to those witnessed in recent years.
The E.U. has pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.
But the families argued this was inadequate to protect their “fundamental rights such as the right to life, health, property, and occupation.”
They called for the bloc to boost its emissions cuts target to 55 percent.
Since the lawsuit was launched, 10 E.U. member states including France and Spain have called on leaders to agree to net zero emissions by 2050.
There are currently around 1,000 cases brought against governments across the world related to climate change and habitat loss, according to a database compiled by the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
Lawyers in the People’s Climate Case say they plan to appeal within the next two months, but cautioned that since the case was dismissed on procedural grounds, no new evidence could be submitted.
The families vowed to keep up their legal fight, however, and to keep the pressure on world leaders to act to stave off the worst effects of climate change.
“At my age, besides joining climate marches with young people, this case is the only thing that I can do to protect my children and grandchildren,” said Maurice Feschet, a 73-year-old French farmer.
“As a citizen, I will keep turning to the courts as politicians fail to deliver the needed climate action.”