• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Saturday, February 4, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Trump-Kim III: Strategic Exercise in Diplomacy or Foolish Spectacle?

Tizoc Chavez by Tizoc Chavez
07/03/19
in Opinion
President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un walk together south of the Military Demarcation Line

President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un walk together south of the Military Demarcation Line. Photo: Brendan Smialowski, AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Whether one loves or hates U.S. President Donald J. Trump, there is no denying that his meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un at the Demilitarized Zone and crossover into North Korean territory was historic.

But to what end?

After the meeting, Trump said, “A lot of great triumphs have been based on relationships.” But so far he has little to show for his bond with Kim. As of now, it’s a one-sided relationship, as the North Korean leader appears the primary beneficiary.

Indeed, after the two men’s latest, the two biggest takeaways from their engagement is a political boost for Kim and the weakening of presidential personal diplomacy.

Differing Views

Depending on one’s perspective, the latest meeting between Trump and Kim was either a strategic exercise in diplomacy or a foolish spectacle.

For supporters, Trump’s invitation to meet at the DMZ was a bold stroke of genius. With negotiations on North Korea’s nuclear program stalled, something needed to be done to jumpstart the process and Trump accomplished that.

It was great being with Chairman Kim Jong Un of North Korea this weekend. We had a great meeting, he looked really well and very healthy – I look forward to seeing him again soon….

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 1, 2019

On the other hand, critics see the latest meeting as pure theatrics. Going into his reelection campaign, the president simply wanted to further the notion that he’s a peacemaker and a statesman.

Critics also say that the most recent meeting is another sign of the president’s dangerous hubris. Trump believes that he has formed a personal bond with a brutal dictator and that the sheer force of his personality and charisma will produce a deal.

Supporters disagree. This isn’t vanity but confidence. The president is a strong, self-assured leader exerting every effort to make the world a safer place.

Results of Trump-Kim III

Regardless of the reasoning behind Trump’s most recent meeting with Kim, nothing has changed.

Tensions between the two countries have lessened because of the president’s engagement with Kim, but North Korea is no closer to giving up its nuclear weapons now than when Trump and Kim first met in June 2018.

United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Photo: AFP

Now comes word that the Trump administration is considering a deal to freeze North Korea’s nuclear program in exchange for concessions. This is a significant shift from the goal of “rapid denuclearization of North Korea, to be completed by January 2021,” which Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declared last September.

While a retreat from the administration’s stated aims, this is the most practical path toward any concrete progress on containing North Korea’s nuclear program. And from the beginning of Trump’s presidency, it has probably been the most realistic strategy.

Have US-North Korea Meetings Been Worth It?

If a nuclear freeze is indeed the route the Trump administration takes, then the president’s use of personal diplomacy with Kim may have been unnecessary and done more harm than good.

In an attempt to forge a personal relationship with Kim, Trump has met with him three times in a little over a year and lavished him with praise. According to the president, it’s worked. He and Kim are “friends.” But both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush negotiated freezes on North Korea’s nuclear program without meeting then-leader Kim Jong Il. And when Barack Obama negotiated a nuclear deal with Iran, he never met with or expressed admiration of its leaders.

US President Donald Trump shakes hands with North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un before a meeting at the Sofitel Legend Metropole hotel in Hanoi on February 27, 2019
US President Donald Trump shakes hands with North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Un at the Hanoi Summit in February. Photo: Saul Loeb, AFP

This is not to say that Trump shouldn’t have personally engaged with Kim. The context today is different than past attempts to curb North Korea’s nuclear program. And a summit may have been the catalyst needed to start negotiations on any type of agreement.

But as it stands, the lack of results toward denuclearization and the president’s excessive flattery of Kim have made Trump’s personal diplomacy not worth the cost.

In his classic work on the presidency, political scientist Clinton Rossiter states that the presidency “unites power, drama, and prestige as does no other office in the world.” This prestige derives from the fact that the presidency combines in one office the roles of commander in chief, chief diplomat, chief of state, and, because of the nation’s economic and military dominance, the role of world leader.

When looking at the three Trump-Kim meetings, what has the American president lent this prestige to?

With no tangible progress on a nuclear deal, the only substantial result has been a political boost to Kim’s brutal regime.

After the latest meeting, North Korean state media was euphoric, calling it the “meeting of the century” and praising the “bold, huge, and courageous decision” to meet. Combine this with the praise Trump frequently heaps upon Kim, and you have a situation that is unseemly and weakens the practice of presidential personal diplomacy.

Past presidents have met with unsavory figures. But the critical difference is that they didn’t go out of their way to praise them or broadcast their close ties. Because the foreign leaders a president decides to meet with and speak warmly of sends signals to domestic and international audiences about American values and priorities.

Looking Ahead

So Trump’s effusive embrace of Kim, as well as other authoritarian leaders like Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, is at odds with traditional American foreign policy and it cheapens presidential personal diplomacy.

And it appears the situation might get worse.

After their DMZ meeting, Trump said he had invited Kim to the White House. Though nothing has been formally arranged, such an invite is ill-conceived. It not only furthers to legitimize Kim’s brutal regime but also at this point serves no purpose.

pic.twitter.com/hWiNicShLY

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 2, 2019

Presidential personal diplomacy is the most high-level tool in the United States’ diplomatic arsenal. It must be used strategically to have value. Invitations to an adversary to visit have historically been given for a specific purpose, such as a reward for good behavior or to finalize an agreement. But so far Kim hasn’t agreed to anything.

At this stage, an invitation rewards Kim for just agreeing to talk. A low bar for such a major perk as visiting the White House.

Trump’s engagement with Kim might still pay dividends, but the administration needs to rethink its use of personal diplomacy. Because as former Secretary of State Dean Rusk warned, “Summit diplomacy is to be approached with the wariness with which a prudent physician prescribes a habit-forming drug – a technique to be employed rarely and under the most exceptional circumstances, with rigorous safeguards against its becoming a debilitating or dangerous habit.”

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
ShareTweet
Tizoc Chavez

Tizoc Chavez

Scholar of the presidency finishing a book on presidential diplomacy

Related Posts

Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023
Opinion

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

by Matthew J. Mayer
February 3, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York
Opinion

George Santos for Speaker!

by Stephen J. Lyons
January 16, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives
National

Chaos as US House Adjourns Without Choosing Speaker

by Staff Writer
January 4, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines
Opinion

Eight Billion and Counting…

by Stephen J. Lyons
November 29, 2022
Donald Trump
National

US Supreme Court Freezes Release of Trump Tax Returns

by Staff Writer
November 1, 2022
Donald Trump
National

US Capitol Riot Probe Votes to Subpoena Trump to Testify

by Staff Writer
October 13, 2022
Next Post
Sudanese protesters from the city of Atbara, flash the V-sign for victory and wave national flags atop a train, as it arrives at the Bahari station in Khartoum

US Must Draw Red Line at Sudan's Tipping Point to Avoid Another Round of Atrocities

Arab Israelis with Palestinian flags

Nine in Ten Palestinians Distrust US Economic Plan: Poll

Recommended

Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
A supporter of nurses' strike and NHS holds a placard

UK Faces Fresh Mass Strikes as Wage Talks Derail

February 1, 2023
Israeli security forces in Jerusalem

Palestinian Gunman Kills 7 in East Jerusalem Synagogue Attack

January 30, 2023
The Doomsday Clock reads 100 seconds to midnight, a decision made by The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, during an announcement at the National Press Club in Washington, DC on January 23, 2020

‘Doomsday Clock’ Moves Closest Ever to Midnight

January 25, 2023
Police work near the scene of a mass shooting in Monterey Park, California

California Lunar New Year Mass Shooter Dead, Motive Unclear: Police

January 23, 2023
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

Race on To Replace Ardern as New Zealand Prime Minister

January 20, 2023

Opinion

Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines

Eight Billion and Counting…

November 29, 2022
Mahsa Amini protests

Imagining a Free Iran

October 24, 2022
Vladimir Putin

How 18th Century International Law Clarifies the Situation in Ukraine

September 29, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Falling for Putin

September 15, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post