• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Tuesday, March 21, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Yalta, 75 Years Later: What Should Be Remembered?

Tizoc Chavez by Tizoc Chavez
02/19/20
in Opinion
British Prime Minister Winston Churchill (L), US President Franklin Roosevelt (C), and Soviet Union Leader Joseph Stalin (R) pose at the start of the Conference of the Allied powers in Yalta, Crimea, in 1945

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill (L), US President Franklin Roosevelt (C), and Soviet Union Leader Joseph Stalin (R) pose at the start of the Conference of the Allied powers in Yalta, Crimea, in 1945. Photo: AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In February 1945, U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Soviet Union leader Josef Stalin met in Yalta to discuss issues of war and peace.

In 2005, 60 years after Yalta, President George W. Bush criticized the decisions made at the conference. He proclaimed that “powerful governments” had sacrificed the freedom of small nations for the “sake of stability,” leaving Europe divided and unstable. “The captivity of millions in Central and Eastern Europe will be remembered as one of the greatest wrongs of history,” he said.

But Bush’s tale of betrayal is a myth. On the conference’s 75th anniversary, the meeting shouldn’t be remembered as an indictment of great power diplomacy. Rather, it’s an enduring case study in the dilemmas of global leadership.

1945 Yalta Conference

Many of the decisions reached at Yalta were initially sketched at the first “Big Three” meeting in Tehran in 1943. Yet Yalta became a dirty word in the late 1940s as the Cold War intensified, and conservatives in America saw an opportunity to attack Roosevelt’s legacy and hurt Democrats’ electoral prospects.

Though much of what was decided in Yalta had been outlined earlier, bargaining was still intense. After an exhausting week, the three men agreed to divide Germany into four occupation zones, settled on the structure of the U.N., and Stalin consented to enter the war in the Pacific in exchange for the Southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands.

The most contentious negotiations were over Poland. Before the conference, Stalin recognized a pro-Soviet government in the country. Churchill and Roosevelt refused to follow suit, and the result was a vague agreement to make the Polish government more inclusive by adding some non-communists. The three men also promised “free and unfettered elections” in Poland, as well to help lands liberated from the Nazis hold elections and form democratic governments.

But Stalin never allowed those elections. Having been invaded twice in the last 30 years, he sought to expand Soviet borders, including a buffer zone of friendly governments in Eastern Europe. He wouldn’t risk democratic elections that might lead to anti-Soviet governments.

Limited Options

What could Roosevelt and Churchill have done to protect Eastern Europe?

Not much. From June 1941 until D-Day in June 1944, the Soviets bore the brunt of German aggression. And once Stalin’s forces began to push back the Nazis in early 1943, it was inevitable they would be the dominant power in Eastern Europe. After years of brutal fighting, with victory now in sight, a new conflict with a wartime ally was an unrealistic option for Western leaders.

Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill. Photo: AFP

One potential source of leverage was economic. Years of fighting left the Soviet economy in shambles, and it needed U.S. aid to rebuild. While some of Roosevelt’s advisers thought postwar financial assistance might be used to induce good behavior from Stalin, the president himself wasn’t convinced. He expected a postwar recession, and the prospects of getting an aid package through Congress were unclear.

Roosevelt also had to prioritize. His main objective was ending the war quickly at the lowest cost possible. At Yalta, the U.S. president was eager to get a firm Soviet commitment to enter the war in the Pacific. American planners estimated an invasion of Japan would cause millions of American causalities. And with the atomic bomb unfinished and its power unknown, Soviet help was deemed essential. Possessing little leverage and needing Stalin’s help, there were limits to how much Roosevelt could push on Eastern Europe.

Global Leadership is Messy

Just like Roosevelt and Churchill, world leaders today face the dilemma of making painful tradeoffs as they attempt to respond to global challenges and advance their national interest. Whether it’s confronting terrorism, civil war, international trade, boundary disputes, or arms control, there are no easy solutions.

Take North Korea’s nuclear program, a problem a generation of leaders has failed to resolve. Diplomacy is necessary, but negotiations haven’t produced an agreement. And as talks drag on, North Korea continues to advance its capabilities.

Economic pressure is more promising, but sanctions place the heaviest toll on ordinary people, not those in power. Financial assistance could be offered as an inducement, but then a rogue regime is rewarded for bad behavior.

A military strike would be the ultimate option, but there is no guarantee it would destroy all of North Korea’s nuclear capabilities. And it could trigger a wider conflict. If the United States attacked, Kim Jong Un could respond by bombarding Seoul, which experts estimate could result in hundreds of thousands of deaths in a matter of days.

President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un walk together south of the Military Demarcation Line
President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un walk south of the Military Demarcation Line. in what some described as a foolish spectacle. Photo: Brendan Smialowski, AFP

Like most international issues, North Korea’s nuclear program requires a combination of approaches. The challenge is finding the right mix.

Global leadership is messy. It requires balancing competing objectives and making imperfect decisions under serious constraints. And it’s as true today as it was 75 years ago at Yalta.

That doesn’t mean, however, that leaders get a pass for their choices.

Roosevelt and Churchill’s diplomacy wasn’t flawless. They placed too much faith in their personal relationship with Stalin, even though it was almost inevitable that an alliance made of necessity would weaken once the threat that created it ceased to exist.

But they didn’t gift Eastern Europe to Stalin. Political and military realities limited what Roosevelt and Churchill could do. They were forced to make unpleasant compromises to advance their objectives. This is a dilemma all world leaders, both past and present, can appreciate.

So, on the 75th anniversary of Yalta, rather than see the treachery of particular leaders, see the travails of leadership. Such an outlook, while not always easy, deepens our understanding of the dynamics involved in global leadership and helps us make sense of a complex world.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
ShareTweet
Tizoc Chavez

Tizoc Chavez

Scholar of the presidency finishing a book on presidential diplomacy

Related Posts

Transgender Army veteran Tanya Walker speaks to protesters in Times Square near a military recruitment centre
Opinion

Tennessee Is A Drag on the First Amendment

by Stephen J. Lyons
March 21, 2023
Chinese President Xi Jinping
Opinion

China’s Path to Economic Dominance

by Baptiste Monnet
March 15, 2023
Myanmar Rohingya refugees look on in a refugee camp in Teknaf, in Bangladesh's Cox's Bazar, on November 26, 2016
Refugees

US Announces $26M in New Aid for Rohingya

by Staff Writer
March 8, 2023
An earthquake survivor reacts as rescuers look for victims and other survivors in Hatay, a Turkish province where hundreds of buildings were destroyed by the earthquake
Opinion

Heed the Call of Our Broken World

by Stephen J. Lyons
March 1, 2023
A Yemeni flag waving
Art

US Returns 77 Stolen Antiquities Back to Yemen

by Staff Writer
February 22, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives
Opinion

‘Cringy Awards:’ Who Is the Most Embarrassing US House Representative?

by Edward C. Halperin
February 13, 2023
Next Post
Democratic Primary: What Happens if No One Wins a Majority of Delegates?

Democratic Primary: What Happens if No One Wins a Majority of Delegates?

Cleaners spray disinfectant in the Customs and Immigration area of Incheon international airport, west of Seoul, South Korea

Coronavirus and the Importance of Separating Fact From Fright

Recommended

Transgender Army veteran Tanya Walker speaks to protesters in Times Square near a military recruitment centre

Tennessee Is A Drag on the First Amendment

March 21, 2023
participants of an artificial intelligence conference

How AI Could Upend the World Even More Than Electricity or the Internet

March 19, 2023
Chinese President Xi Jinping

China’s Path to Economic Dominance

March 15, 2023
Heavily armed police inspect the area near a Jehovah's Witness church where several people have been killed in a shooting in Hamburg, northern Germany

Eight Dead in Shooting at Jehovah’s Witness Hall in Germany

March 10, 2023
Myanmar Rohingya refugees look on in a refugee camp in Teknaf, in Bangladesh's Cox's Bazar, on November 26, 2016

US Announces $26M in New Aid for Rohingya

March 8, 2023
A flooded road in Batu Berendam in Malaysia's southern coastal state of Malacca

At Least Four Dead, Tens of Thousands Evacuated in Malaysia Floods

March 6, 2023

Opinion

Transgender Army veteran Tanya Walker speaks to protesters in Times Square near a military recruitment centre

Tennessee Is A Drag on the First Amendment

March 21, 2023
Chinese President Xi Jinping

China’s Path to Economic Dominance

March 15, 2023
An earthquake survivor reacts as rescuers look for victims and other survivors in Hatay, a Turkish province where hundreds of buildings were destroyed by the earthquake

Heed the Call of Our Broken World

March 1, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives

‘Cringy Awards:’ Who Is the Most Embarrassing US House Representative?

February 13, 2023
Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post