• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Friday, March 5, 2021
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Featured

Netanyahu’s Annexation, Brexit, and the Doctrine of National Self-Harm

Nir Arielli by Nir Arielli
06/22/20
in Featured, Opinion
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Photo: Menahem Kahana/AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Britain’s decision to leave the European Union, especially in a “no-deal” scenario, has often been described as an act of national self-harm by world leaders, foreign and domestic observers, and business chiefs.

Prompted by a controversial referendum in 2016, the British government officially left the EU in early 2020. At present, the two sides are supposed to be negotiating a new trade agreement at break-neck speed before the transition period expires at the end of the year.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s current push to annex up to 30 percent of the West Bank is an entirely different kettle of fish. However, on top of potentially bringing about international isolation and sparking a Palestinian uprising, annexation may also prove hugely costly and dangerous for Israel.

In fact, Brexit and Netanyahu’s plan have at least five characteristics in common.

Right-Wing Projects

Both Brexit and the proposed annexation of Palestinian territories are right-wing projects. One of the key slogans of the “Leave” campaign in the Brexit referendum was the call to “take back control.”

Britain has a glorious past, the argument went, and if it were to break free of the shackles imposed on it by the EU, it could once again strike lucrative trade deals across the globe. Romanticized memories of the British Empire loomed large over the Brexit debate.

Welcome to the Britain’s self-inflicted post-Brexit unlevel playing field. Not so much take back control but abandon control and expose UK business to one-way free movement of goods. Telling that this is what now passes for good news. https://t.co/Fa7uoZIoTR

— Simon Nixon (@Simon_Nixon) June 12, 2020

In Israel, voices on the right have long called for the annexation of the West Bank, captured from Jordan in the 1967 Six-Day War. Judea and Samaria, as the area is called in Jewish nationalist circles, are the site of several scenes from the Hebrew bible.

The nationalist Likud Party, led by Netanyahu, had long considered these territories to be part of the “whole land of Israel.” However, in the past 53 years, Israeli governments were reluctant to annex the area with its large Palestinian population for fear of international responses.

Tailwind from Trump

President Donald Trump was elected in November 2016, a few months after the Brexit referendum. Since then, he has repeatedly expressed his support for Britain leaving the EU and even criticized then Prime Minister Theresa May for not pursuing a harder form of Brexit in 2019.

Anti-Brexit campaigners in the UK fear that Trump wishes to use Britain’s weakened position in trade negotiations to pave the way for American farming and pharmaceutical companies into the British market.

US President Donald Trump
US President Donald Trump. Photo: AFP

In the Israeli context, Trump has lent his support to Netanyahu on several occasions, most notably by moving the US embassy to Jerusalem and by declaring that he recognizes Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights – a territory captured by Israel from Syria in 1967 and formally annexed in 1981 (despite the opposition of the Reagan administration).

President Trump also published a peace plan that aligns very closely with Netanyahu’s aspirations and thus has no chance of ever being accepted by the Palestinian leadership. Trump’s support has helped Netanyahu’s image in recent election campaigns.

Meanwhile, it is widely assumed that the US president expects his position towards Israel to help him among evangelical voters in his November re-election bid.

Control

A chief concern among pro-Brexit voters in 2016 was immigration. The “Leave” campaign capitalized on this, arguing that once out of the EU, Britain could pass its own laws and shape its own immigration policy.

However, when pressed on this issue, supporters of Brexit struggled to name any rules that the UK was incapable of passing while still an EU member. Indeed, the UK’s immigration policy had changed drastically in recent decades, despite its EU membership.

Israel meanwhile is already in full control of the territories Netanyahu seeks to annex. Over the years, Israel has established several Jewish settlements in the West Bank, even though the area’s final status remains disputed.

A legitimate question that can be posed to both the Israeli and the British government is whether these acts of asserting their sovereignty gives them any real advantages they do not already enjoy.

The Citizenship Conundrum

Both Netanyahu’s annexation and Brexit create a problem with the legal status of Palestinians in the West Bank and EU nationals who reside in the UK respectively.

Estimates regarding the number of EU nationals in Britain vary, but there are well over 2 million and possibly more than 3.5 million people whose status became much more precarious as a result of Brexit. The British government came under sharp criticism for how it has handled the fate of EU nationals but has at least established a pathway that European passport holders can follow if they wish to remain in the UK after the transition period.

In this case, Netanyahu is lagging far behind. A map outlining precisely which territories are to be annexed has yet to be published. As a result, there is growing uncertainty among Palestinians in the West Bank who do not know whether their home will or will not become part of Israel. This unease seems perfectly understandable bearing in mind Netanyahu has already indicated that any Palestinians in the territories annexed won’t be granted Israeli citizenship.

International Opposition and Domestic Divisions   

The Netanyahu government’s declared intention to proceed with annexation in early July has been met with objections from several quarters.

The plan has been harshly condemned by King Abdullah of Jordan and the Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, who declared he is no longer bound by the agreements signed with previous Israeli governments.

Democrat leaders in the US and the Russian government have indicated, separately, that annexation would be detrimental to any attempt to revive the peace process. The German foreign minister made a special visit to Israel to voice his concern and warn that other European Union states may go as far as to impose sanctions. Prominent British Jews published a letter saying it would not be possible for them to defend Israel if the annexation was to proceed.

Meanwhile, there has also been some domestic disquiet, with senior security officials grumbling that they haven’t been consulted. Public opinion in Israel is hardly enthusiastic. A recent poll has shown that only 34 percent of the population supports the move. A staggering 69 percent said that the government’s top priority should be tending to the economic crisis and high unemployment brought about by COVID-19.

Perhaps unexpectedly for foreign observers, there is opposition to annexation among some of the more hardline Jewish settlers in the West Bank. They fear that if Israel does annex parts of the West Bank now, it would be forced to recognize an independent Palestinian state in the remainder as envisaged in Trump’s peace plan.

Indications are that Netanyahu will be forced either to scale down significantly or postpone the annexation project.

There is less room for optimism regarding the UK and Brexit. Despite an unprecedented economic slowdown – the UK economy shrunk by 20 percent in April as a result of COVID-19 lockdown – Boris Johnson’s government seems intent on “getting Brexit done.” If no deal is concluded with the EU, Britain’s largest and nearest trading partner, the economic consequences will be dire.

Both the UK and Israel appear to be experimenting with a doctrine of national self-harm.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
ShareTweet
Nir Arielli

Nir Arielli

Associate Professor of International History at the University of Leeds, UK. His most recent book, From Byron to bin Laden: A History of Foreign War Volunteers, was published by Harvard University Press in 2018

Related Posts

Jake Angeli speaks to a US Capitol Police officer.
Opinion

Attempted US Capitol Coup a Security and Existential Crisis

by Ryan Skinnell
March 3, 2021
Former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (L) meets with Sudanese Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok in Khartoum, last August
Opinion

Sudan’s Normalization With Israel Is a Win for Everyone

by Jon Davis and Erielle Davidson
February 26, 2021
Republican Senator from Missouri Josh Hawley
Opinion

Trump’s Acquittal and Republican Senators: Not Setting the Bar Low Enough

by Stephen J. Lyons
February 22, 2021
Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
World

Iran to Host UN Nuclear Watchdog Chief Ahead of Sanctions Deadline

by Staff Writer
February 20, 2021
Israel blocked an initial shipment of Sputnik V from entering Gaza.
Middle East

First Batch of Covid-19 Vaccine Arrives in Gaza After Israel’s Blockage

by Staff Writer
February 17, 2021
Students with face masks go upstairs to their classrooms at the Petri primary school in Dortmund, western Germany, on August 12, 2020, amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
Opinion

As America Accelerates Vaccine Distribution, Curiosity Turns to Kids

by Lori Lennon
February 15, 2021
Next Post
Children stand among the rooftops of homes after the Yusuf Batir refugee camp in South Sudan was hit by flooding, November 2019

World Refugee Day 2020: Is It Time for a New Refugee Convention?

US President Donald Trump speaks as he departs the White House, on May 5, 2020, in Washington, DC en route to Arizona, where he will tour a mask factory and hold a roundtable on Native American issues

June 14 - June 20: Trump’s Worst Week to Date?

Please login to join discussion

Recommended

Senegalese police intervening a protest in support of the arrested opposition leader Ousmane Sonko in Dakar.

Senegal Clashes Kill One After Opposition Leader Arrest

March 5, 2021
Malika Boumendjel, widow of Algerian lawyer Ali Boumendjel, speaks in a 2001 interview about her husband's death during his detention by the French army.

Algeria Welcomes France’s Admission It Killed Independence Figure

March 4, 2021
Jake Angeli speaks to a US Capitol Police officer.

Attempted US Capitol Coup a Security and Existential Crisis

March 3, 2021
Myanmar police fire water cannon at protesters as they continue to demonstrate against the February 1 military coup.

Six Dead as Myanmar Security Forces Fire at Protesters

March 3, 2021
Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi was killed on October 2, 2018, while he was inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, Turkey.

Reporters Without Borders Sue Saudi Prince Over Khashoggi Murder

March 2, 2021
Hatice Cengiz delivers a speech addressing the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs subcommittee on Capitol Hill, May 16, 2019.

Khashoggi Fiancée Demands Punishment for Saudi Prince

March 1, 2021

Opinion

Jake Angeli speaks to a US Capitol Police officer.

Attempted US Capitol Coup a Security and Existential Crisis

March 3, 2021
What President Biden Should Do About the Uyghur Genocide

What President Biden Should Do About the Uyghur Genocide

March 1, 2021
Former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (L) meets with Sudanese Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok in Khartoum, last August

Sudan’s Normalization With Israel Is a Win for Everyone

February 26, 2021
Stolpersteine in Greifswald, Germany.

I Can’t Mark Where My Grandfather Is Buried, but I Want to Mark Where He Lived

February 26, 2021
Republican Senator from Missouri Josh Hawley

Trump’s Acquittal and Republican Senators: Not Setting the Bar Low Enough

February 22, 2021
Why Not Equality for America’s Puerto Rican Men and Women?

Why Not Equality for America’s Puerto Rican Men and Women?

February 19, 2021
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post