• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Saturday, June 3, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Cambridge Analytica: Tip of the Iceberg as Deep as the Ocean

Aram Sinnreich by Aram Sinnreich
06/22/18
in Opinion
Cambridge Analytica's Alexander Nix

Cambridge Analytica's deposed chief executive Alexander Nix. Photo: Pedro Nunes, Reuters.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Alexander Nix, the deposed chief executive of the infamous and now defunct political consultancy Cambridge Analytica (CA), did his best to convince British lawmakers last week that they were making a mountain out of a molehill.

Testifying before Parliament’s media committee, Nix claimed that the firm was merely “a very small ad agency,” and that its collection and deployment of intimate data regarding at least 87 million Facebook users without their knowledge or consent was nothing more than a “genuine misunderstanding.” Yet despite these protestations, and regardless of the veracity of his claims, the CA scandal is far larger than a molehill or even a mountain: it’s the visible tip of an iceberg as deep as the ocean, threatening to sink the ship of Western liberal democracy.

For those of us following the Cambridge Analytica scandal via public news reports, it’s difficult to know whether the claims made about the consultancy’s pivotal role in the Brexit campaign, Donald J. Trump‘s presidential campaign, and other major political events over the past few years are wildly overblown or dangerously underappreciated.

To be sure, a fair number of data scientists have dismissed CA’s “behavioral microtargeting” techniques as digital snake oil. Nix himself testified that the laundry list of dirty tricks – including sexual entrapment and bribery, that he was caught on tape offering to a Channel 4 journalist posing as a prospective client – were nothing more than “hyperbole.”

Yet the firm must have had some value to its clientele, given the massive amounts of money it consistently commanded for its services, as well as its alignment with winning campaigns in the U.K., U.S., Kenya, Mexico, and India. The ownership stakes of the right-wing billionaire Mercer family and the executive role of “alt-right” political strategist and propagandist Steve Bannon also suggest that CA’s function in these campaigns was integral, strategic, and partisan, rather than that of an unbiased third-party service provider.

Regardless of CA’s intentions or efficacy, its actions point to larger vulnerabilities in our media and political systems that exceed any damage the firm itself may have done.

To begin with, CA’s microtargeting strategy relied on a technological and legal architecture that allowed it to gain access to highly personal information regarding tens of millions of people on Facebook, a company that collects an unprecedented volume of data from 2.2 billion active monthly users across the globe.

Far from being a “hack” or an “exploit,” the mechanism that CA employed was engineered intentionally by the social media giant, and in fact, the collection, analysis, and transaction of such data is the linchpin of its entire business model, which garnered over $40 billion in revenue last year. During the Brexit campaign and 2016 U.S. presidential election, the company actively promoted itself as a political intelligence and marketing platform and even embedded its employees within the Trump campaign. In other words, CA took advantage of a much larger data infrastructure that has been deployed on behalf of a much larger range of clients on a far greater scale.

Facebook acted at best negligently, and possibly maliciously, in turning a blind eye for years to repeated warnings from technology researchers, policy wonks, and public advocates about the potential for misuse of its platform. And, at the time of writing, the CA scandal is only one of many public relations disasters stemming from the company’s voracious collection and lax management of the information its customers have entrusted it with. In the past week alone, the company has been roundly criticized for sharing the private posts of at least 14 million users with the general public, and for sharing consumers’ personal data, without their knowledge or consent, with phone manufacturers, including four connected to the Chinese government.

Yet, as large and powerful as Facebook is, and as integral as its consumer data were to the CA scandal, the company is only one example of larger and less widely recognized data mining infrastructure that has come to dominate nearly every aspect of the internet as a business and civic platform.

This larger infrastructure is typified by both consumer-facing companies like Google and Amazon, and less well-known but equally central ones like Acxiom and Palantir Technologies. While these companies represent a broad range of applications and functions, their platforms and business models all ladder up to a similar goal: namely, collecting as much information as possible about what people do, whom they know, how they spend their money, and how they think about the world, and then using those data to make predictions about what they’ll do, buy, and think next.

These invasive practices and predictive powers, in turn, exist to serve two deeply interconnected new varieties of institutions that are reshaping our cultural and political landscapes.

The first is widely referred to as “surveillance capitalism.” Instead of competing for consumers’ attention and dollars by racing to provide the most innovative and useful products, businesses in this model compete to collect and sell the most consumer data and to influence their purchasing behaviors most effectively.

The second is often called the “digital surveillance state.” While Eastern Bloc countries in the mid-20th century frequently tapped phones and even tailed suspected dissidents as they walked the streets, this new political model aims to collect every conversation, transaction, and public and private activity of each citizen, then sift through the data for signs of emerging threats.

Any reasonable person would conclude that neither free markets nor free nations can exist under conditions such as these. Yet, despite nominal legal protections from the U.S. Constitution to the E.U.’s General Data Protection Regulation, commercial and political surveillance are both escalating rapidly. While we must hold the Cambridge Analyticas and the Facebooks accountable for their roles, nothing will improve until we’re able to see the entire iceberg lurking beneath these surface features and steer a wide course around it.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share2Tweet
Aram Sinnreich

Aram Sinnreich

Associate Professor and Chair, Communication Studies, American University School of Communication in Washington.

Related Posts

A woman checks her phone as she shelters under an umbrella in the rain on Oxford Street in London on June 18, 2020, as some non-essential retailers reopen from their coronavirus shutdown.
Opinion

Tech’s Dominant Power Undermines Our Human Right to Privacy

by Michael Kleinman
July 28, 2020
People in front of a screen displaying Microsoft
Opinion

Microsoft and Privacy Policies: Never-Ending Tale?

by Osama Tahir
August 19, 2019
participants of an artificial intelligence conference
Opinion

Why Artificial Intelligence Needs Democratic Governance

by Birgit Schippers
April 9, 2019
Facial recognition systems are being used to speed the boarding process at Dulles International Airport and may eventually eliminate the need for a board pass
Opinion

Facial Recognition Systems are Booming – and so Should Our Concerns

by William Michael Carter
March 31, 2019
Facebook recently celebrated it fifteenth anniversary
Opinion

Facebook’s Anniversary: Fifteen Years Since User Data Became Commodity

by Ivan Manokha
March 12, 2019
Taylor Swift at the 58th Grammy Awards in LA, 2016
Opinion

Taylor Swift’s Facial Recognition is Creepy but Would New US Privacy Laws Prevent It?

by Eerke Boiten
January 1, 2019
Next Post
The participants of the march for peace in Afghanistan

Afghanistan Celebrates Temporary Ceasefire Amid Calls for Permanent Truce

Rodrigo Duterte

Women March in Philippines to Tell President Duterte 'Enough'

Recommended

A man holds US, Taiwan flags

US and Taiwan Ink Trade Deal as China Issues Warning

June 2, 2023
Migrants waiting at the Turkish border.

Beyond Numbers: Confronting Europe’s Broken Border System

May 30, 2023
A noose is seen on makeshift gallows as supporters of US President Donald Trump gather on the West side of the US Capitol in Washington DC on January 6, 2021

Militia Leader Gets 18 Years in Prison Over US Capitol Attack

May 26, 2023
Customers queue to enter a re-opened Zara clothes shop

EU Targets Fast Fashion in Push for Durable Goods

May 23, 2023
A billboard showing the debt limit is seen in Washington, D.C.

US Republicans Upbeat on Prospects for Debt Deal

May 19, 2023
Military hardware rolls through Dvortsovaya Square during a Victory Day military parade in central Saint Petersburg

Pressing Russia, US Shares Nuclear Warhead Data Under Treaty

May 16, 2023

Opinion

Migrants waiting at the Turkish border.

Beyond Numbers: Confronting Europe’s Broken Border System

May 30, 2023
A man holding a gun

The NRA’s Continuing Agenda of Fear

May 12, 2023
US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas

A Supreme Folly 

April 24, 2023
Transgender Army veteran Tanya Walker speaks to protesters in Times Square near a military recruitment centre

Tennessee Is A Drag on the First Amendment

March 26, 2023
Chinese President Xi Jinping

China’s Path to Economic Dominance

March 15, 2023
An earthquake survivor reacts as rescuers look for victims and other survivors in Hatay, a Turkish province where hundreds of buildings were destroyed by the earthquake

Heed the Call of Our Broken World

March 1, 2023
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post