• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Tuesday, August 16, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Why Artificial Intelligence Needs Democratic Governance

Birgit Schippers by Birgit Schippers
04/09/19
in Opinion
participants of an artificial intelligence conference

Participants at Intel's Artificial Intelligence (AI) Day stand in front of a poster during the event in the Indian city of Bangalore on April 4, 2017. Photo: Manjunath Kiran, AFP

15
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Popular depictions of artificial intelligence-based systems present a frightening and opaque Orwellian power that appears to dominate the lives of human beings – think Terminator or Hal 9000. In my view, the idea that AI will take over the world is misplaced. However, I do believe AI poses serious threats to democratic politics, democratic institutions, and our capacity and right to engage freely in democratic practices.

We must urgently address these threats by strengthening democratic control over those who design and develop AI, profit from it, and can use it to the detriment of democratic politics.

Artificial Intelligence and Bias

Recent concerns over AI focused on its potential to compound existing racial and gender-based inequalities. For example, research by MIT scholar Joy Buolamwini and UCLA Professor Safiya Noble has demonstrated how algorithms trained on racially biased data sets discriminate against people of color, especially against women of color.

The standard response to this concern is a call for diversity: we should use a diverse range of training data for algorithms, for example by including more dark-skinned and female faces when developing training data for face recognition technologies. We should also diversify the pool of AI developers beyond the predominantly pale and male staff.

AI’s Structural Threat to Democracies

The call to diversify the AI workforce has become shorthand for democratizing AI. Such focus is undoubtedly important and welcome: a diverse workforce brings a range of life experiences and perspectives to the workplace and workplace practices. But diversity does not tackle AI’s structural threat to our democracies. This threat runs deeper than the “add color, gender, and stir” approach.

Paul Nemitz, Principal Advisor in the European Commission, argues that AI technologies have the potential to distort the infrastructure of democratic deliberation and its context.

AI provides the tools that enable direct interference with democratic processes, for example by facilitating practices of misinformation and by microtargeting prospective voters through individually tailored political advertising. Such microtargeting exploits individual fears and vulnerabilities for political gain. It undermines the shared information basis of political communities, and destroys what philosopher Hannah Arendt called our “common world.”

Regulating Tech Companies

Facebook recently celebrated it fifteenth anniversary
Facebook recently celebrated its fifteenth anniversary. Photo: Brendan Smialowski, AFP

The actions of Facebook and Cambridge Analytica in the 2016 Brexit referendum and the U.S. presidential election of the same year have become textbook examples of digitally mediated interferences in the democratic process. Worryingly, recent evidence suggests that such practices continue.

These interferences benefit from the almost unfettered power of big tech companies, their respective models of surveillance capitalism, and their capacity to undermine democratic processes, practices, and institutions.

Regulating the tech giants and curtailing their influence on democratic politics is an urgent task. This task requires effective oversight over AI companies, conducted by AI-literate, democratic institutions, but also by other participants in the democratic process, including journalists, NGOs, academics, and the broader citizenry.

AI Concerns

The effective regulation of tech giants must also tackle wealth inequalities that these companies create, whether in their local communities or globally.

Further, oversight must strengthen the employment rights of tech workers. These employees have been at the forefront of campaigns that monitor the practices of tech companies, and tech workers have been instrumental in highlighting projects whose sole purpose seems to be enhanced state surveillance and targeting vulnerable people.

A Chinese flag wavers in front of a Google building.
Google launched its China-based search page in 2006 but left the country four years later. Photo: AFP

For example, Google employees called out their company’s – now abandoned –Dragonfly project and its – also discontinued – participation in Project Maven, while Amazon staff asked their company to stop selling face recognition software to law enforcement agencies.

These examples highlight two additional concerns: the collaboration between private corporations and state agencies tasked with security, intelligence, and criminal justice responsibilities; and the design and development of AI-based technologies with a negative impact on human rights, civil liberties, and the capacity to participate in democratic politics.

AI as Technology of Control

Our rights-based democracies are vulnerable to the enormous surveillance capacity of AI-driven systems, which undermine our right to privacy and which interfere with the rights to freedom of expression and movement.

I do not deny that AI can be a force for good. But when used badly, wrongly, or with malicious intent, it becomes a technology of control. For example, the rolling out of face recognition technology in public spaces, or practices such as predictive policing, create a chill-factor that undermines the political culture where democratic politics thrives.

Wow! China Airport face recognition systems to help you check your flight status and find the way to your gate. Note I did not input anything, it accurately identified my full flight information from my face! pic.twitter.com/5ASdrwA7wj

— Matthew Brennan (@mbrennanchina) March 24, 2019

Data harvesting by private corporations and data sharing between those corporations and law enforcement agencies compound the threat to individual human rights, civil liberties, and the framework of democratic politics.

Artificial Intelligence Paradox

Artificial intelligence presents us with a paradox: AI is here to stay, and we increasingly rely on AI systems in our everyday lives and in practices as democratically engaged citizens, even in our criticism of AI.

We must urgently decide what AI-mediated democracies should look like. Can the AI genie released from the bottle of human creativity be democratized?

Democratic practices and values, including equality, participation, and accountability, must underpin the governance of AI, from the design and development stages to its application by users. AI needs democratic governance.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share15Tweet
Birgit Schippers

Birgit Schippers

Senior Lecturer in Politics at St Mary’s University College Belfast and a visiting research fellow at the Senator George J. Mitchell Institute for Global Peace, Security and Justice at Queen’s University Belfast

Related Posts

Google logo
Business

Google to Pay $90 Mn in Settlement With App Developers

by Staff Writer
July 1, 2022
Apple
Business

Apple, Google, Other US Tech Titans Look to Ditch Passwords

by Staff Writer
May 5, 2022
Facebook hate speech
Business

UN Slams Facebook Decision on Violent Messages

by Staff Writer
March 11, 2022
Baidu
Business

Chinese Tech Giant Baidu Tests Metaverse Waters With New App

by Staff Writer
December 27, 2021
Instagram
Business

Instagram’s Impact on Children Probed by US States

by Staff Writer
November 18, 2021
‘Very… Meta’: Twitter Cracks Up Over Facebook Name Change
Business

‘Very… Meta’: Twitter Cracks Up Over Facebook Name Change

by Staff Writer
October 29, 2021
Next Post
Myanmar Rohingya refugees look on in a refugee camp in Teknaf, in Bangladesh's Cox's Bazar, on November 26, 2016

Race, Ethnicity, and Culture: How do Rohingya Explain Concepts that Undermine their Existence?

Demonstrators take to the streets in Algeria to protest against a fifth term for President Abdelaziz Bouteflika

Bouteflika Ally Named Algeria's First New President in 20 Years

Recommended

Marina Ovsyannikova

Russian TV Journalist Faces Jail Time for Anti-Putin Protest

August 10, 2022
Mar-A-Lago raid

FBI Raid on Trump’s Home Ignites Political Firestorm

August 9, 2022
Ukraine nuclear plant

Ukraine Calls for De-Militarization of Occupied Nuclear Plant

August 8, 2022
Toru Kubota

Myanmar Junta Charges Japanese Journalist With Encouraging Dissent

August 4, 2022
Nancy Pelosi

Taiwan Defiant as China Readies Military Drills Over Pelosi Visit

August 3, 2022
Protesters stand with placards in front of the statue of India's independence leader Mahatma Gandhi in Parliament Square, central London, after a demonstration outside the US Embassy

Considering the Patience of Gandhi for These Troubled Times

August 5, 2022

Opinion

Protesters stand with placards in front of the statue of India's independence leader Mahatma Gandhi in Parliament Square, central London, after a demonstration outside the US Embassy

Considering the Patience of Gandhi for These Troubled Times

August 5, 2022
US President Donald Trump

Owning the Words and the Libs

June 16, 2022
Officers in Uvalde, Texas, stand outside Robb Elementary School near a makeshift memorial for the shooting victims

Child Sacrifice Makes a Comeback

June 3, 2022
A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post