• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Wednesday, March 29, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Why is Afghan Government Afraid of US Direct Talks with Taliban?

Hamidullah Bamik by Hamidullah Bamik
08/05/18
in Opinion
aliban fighters react to a speech by their senior leader in the Shindand district of Herat province, Afghanistan

Taliban fighters in the Herat province, Afghanistan. Photo: Allauddin Khan, AP

281
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Since the beginning of the  Afghan peace process, the Taliban has always refused to negotiate directly with the Afghan government and called for direct talks with Washington instead.

During this year’s Ramadan, Afghan President Mohammad Ashraf Ghani announced a seven-day ceasefire, hoping to encourage the Taliban to come to the negotiating table. In return, the Taliban announced only three days of ceasefire, after which they continued their suicide bombings and attacks on Afghan military bases.

When the government’s seven-day truce expired, it was unilaterally extended for another ten days. The Taliban responded with severe onslaughts on Afghan military citadels. Finally, Ghani ended the one-sided ceasefire and ordered the security forces to step up their military operations against the Taliban.

Unfortunately, the ceasefire did not change the Taliban’s stance of not negotiating directly with Kabul. When Kabul’s actions to get the Taliban to peace talks did not get anywhere, Trump’s administration urged its diplomats to seek direct talks with the group. It reflected a dramatic change in the American policy of not communicating directly with the Taliban. The silence of the Afghan government in this regard indicates Kabul’s uneasiness with Washington’s direct talks with the group.

During his first days in office, President Donald J. Trump held a press conference to announce what was considered a major change in U.S. policy towards the Afghan government. Political analysts argue that Trump’s office is quietly looking for significant changes in its approach, leading senior U.S. diplomats to direct talks with the Taliban.

The new approach of the U.S. is brought up at a time when the Taliban views the Afghan government as an illegitimate and U.S.- handpicked one. The Taliban has long argued that it only negotiates with the U.S. that overthrew the Taliban regime in 2001, while the U.S. constantly insisted that the Taliban should talk directly with Kabul.

A recent report by the U.S. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) points to another factor that could persuade Washington to seek direct talks with the Taliban. According to the report, the Afghan government has control or influence over only 229 out of 407 districts, while the Taliban controls 59 of them. In the remaining 119 districts battles between the Afghan government and Taliban insurgents take place.

Meanwhile, the United Nations said that in the first six months of this year, the number of civilian casualties reached 1,692, hitting a record since the start of the 2009 U.N. investigations in Afghanistan. It is argued that the above factors, eventually, led the U.S. to start direct talks with the Taliban group.

When the New York Times reported that U.S. officials were looking for direct talks with the Afghan Taliban insurgents because peace talks led by Afghans would get nowhere, it came as a heart attack for the Afghan government, explaining why Kabul did not take a vivid stance toward the new U.S. approach yet. But why is the Afghan government afraid of direct talks between the U.S. and the Taliban?

Kabul’s fear derives from several issues. If the Afghan government is sidelined in peace talks with the Taliban, it echoes that they are a puppet of the U.S. without full authority when it comes to large-scale political decision-making, damaging their political legitimacy. The Afghan government is afraid that it may not be able to bring up all its demands in the peace talks if the U.S. leads the negotiations.

Political experts believe that the Afghan government leaders want to use the Afghan peace process for their own political gain, by campaigning for themselves for the next presidential election via winning the peace process. For this reason, the Afghan government persistently insists on direct talks with the Taliban group. If Ghani succeeds in bringing the Taliban group to the negotiating table, it could be marked as a great victory of his presidency, resulting in adoration inside and outside the country. Moreover, if Ghani achieves peace, he will be characterized as the hero that ended 17 years of war in Afghanistan.

The Afghan government’s unilateral ceasefire has raised Ghani’s popularity to the extent that Zarif Aminyar, a political expert and Harvard alumni, penned an article about him, questioning if Ghani could become the Gandhi of Afghanistan. Aminyar holds that Ghani is a reformist leader, whom the U.S. government strongly needed as a partner over the years of former President Hamid Karzai’s unforeseeable regime.

If the U.S. wants to restore peace and prosperity in Afghanistan, Ghani is undoubtedly one of the best options for leading the country. President Ghani is full of love and passion for ending war and conflict, but the U.S. seems suspicious. When the prospective conqueror of the Afghan war is praised in such manner, it is obvious that the U.S. direct talks with the Taliban group can cloud these sweet words.

Last but not the least, every smart politician knows that the Afghan conflict is a multidimensional one involving Afghan, regional, and global actors. Given its inherent complexity, none of the main actors holds the key to solving the crisis. Therefore, the peace process will be challenging and requires time.

The only alternative to the continuing bleeding and instability is that the parties involved should provide a path to the peace process. Thus, the leaders of the Afghan government should cooperate with other countries engaged in this war instead of dreaming of winning the battlefield alone. The idea that they can manipulate peace talks with the Taliban in their favor in the future presidential elections is a false and shortsighted calculation.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share281Tweet
Hamidullah Bamik

Hamidullah Bamik

Afghan Fulbright Scholar and Graduate Student in Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis at the University of Missouri-Columbia

Related Posts

Donald Trump
National

US Supreme Court Freezes Release of Trump Tax Returns

by Staff Writer
November 1, 2022
Donald Trump
National

US Capitol Riot Probe Votes to Subpoena Trump to Testify

by Staff Writer
October 13, 2022
Taliban fighters
Featured

UN Expert Decries ‘Systematic’ Attacks on Afghan Shiites

by Staff Writer
September 12, 2022
Steve Bannon
National

Former Trump Advisor Bannon Charged With Fraud in New York

by Staff Writer
September 8, 2022
US President Donald Trump
Opinion

Donald Trump Thanks You for Your Sacrifice

by Stephen J. Lyons
August 17, 2022
Mar-A-Lago raid
National

FBI Raid on Trump’s Home Ignites Political Firestorm

by Staff Writer
August 9, 2022
Next Post
Afghan security officials secured a road leading to the midwifery school under attack in Jalalabad, in Nangarhar Province on July 28

Unfolding Emerging Concepts About Afghan Peace Process

Afghan protesters shouting slogans on Wednesday during a protest in Mainama, the capital of Faryab Province

Demonstrations in North Afghanistan: Lessons on Rule of Law

Recommended

Damage from a series of powerful storms and at least one tornado is seen on March 25, 2023, in Rolling Fork, Mississippi

After Tornado Kills 25, Mississippi Faces More Extreme Weather

March 26, 2023
Transgender Army veteran Tanya Walker speaks to protesters in Times Square near a military recruitment centre

Tennessee Is A Drag on the First Amendment

March 26, 2023
participants of an artificial intelligence conference

How AI Could Upend the World Even More Than Electricity or the Internet

March 19, 2023
Chinese President Xi Jinping

China’s Path to Economic Dominance

March 15, 2023
Heavily armed police inspect the area near a Jehovah's Witness church where several people have been killed in a shooting in Hamburg, northern Germany

Eight Dead in Shooting at Jehovah’s Witness Hall in Germany

March 10, 2023
Myanmar Rohingya refugees look on in a refugee camp in Teknaf, in Bangladesh's Cox's Bazar, on November 26, 2016

US Announces $26M in New Aid for Rohingya

March 8, 2023

Opinion

Transgender Army veteran Tanya Walker speaks to protesters in Times Square near a military recruitment centre

Tennessee Is A Drag on the First Amendment

March 26, 2023
Chinese President Xi Jinping

China’s Path to Economic Dominance

March 15, 2023
An earthquake survivor reacts as rescuers look for victims and other survivors in Hatay, a Turkish province where hundreds of buildings were destroyed by the earthquake

Heed the Call of Our Broken World

March 1, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives

‘Cringy Awards:’ Who Is the Most Embarrassing US House Representative?

February 13, 2023
Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post