• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Friday, May 20, 2022
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Is Judge’s Ruling in CNN Case a Victory for Free Speech?

Steven Mulroy by Steven Mulroy
11/18/18
in Opinion
US President Donald Trump and CNN journalist Jim Acosta

US President Donald Trump and CNN journalist Jim Acosta. Photo: Mandel Ngan, AFP

41
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

CNN recently won a round in its legal battle with the White House over press credentials for its aggressive White House correspondent Jim Acosta. The ruling seemed correct on the law, but narrower than it could have been, postponing for another day a definitive decision on the free speech rights of the White House press corps.

The White House revoked Acosta’s press credentials last week shortly after a tense exchange between Acosta and President Donald J. Trump at a recent press conference. It was the first time in history that the White House revoked the credentials of a reporter who had White House reporting privileges.

This past week, D.C. federal district court judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee, granted CNN a temporary injunction against revoking Acosta’s White House press credentials. Litigation could continue next week toward a permanent ruling in the case. In the meantime, Acosta returned to normal White House press corps access.

The ruling is not surprising.

The D.C. Circuit Court, an appellate court one step below the Supreme Court and immediately above Judge Kelly, long ago ruled that White House press passes cannot be revoked or denied arbitrarily, and certainly not because of disapproval of what a particular journalist has to say.

Instead, the government must supply a “compelling” reason for the revocation, like the security of the president or his family. This reason must be in writing, and the reporter affected must have notice of the basis for revocation and an opportunity to rebut it.

The Fake News is doing everything in their power to blame Republicans, Conservatives and me for the division and hatred that has been going on for so long in our Country. Actually, it is their Fake & Dishonest reporting which is causing problems far greater than they understand!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 29, 2018

Judge Kelly followed this ruling, stating narrowly that due process entitles CNN and Acosta to an explanation of the basis for its revocation and an opportunity to appeal it. Indeed, the trial judge said that the process for approving or revoking White House press credentials was “shrouded in mystery.” It wasn’t even clear who decided in Acosta’s case, the judge said.

Free Speech

Thus, by relying on due process principles, the court has not ruled definitively on the free speech issue at the heart of the case.

Even so, the ruling is unsurprising from a free speech perspective as well. It is in accord with a longstanding free speech principle that “content-based” restrictions on speech – rules that depend on the content of what the speaker is saying – get “strict scrutiny,” the most demanding type of judicial review. Even worse from a constitutional perspective is action that is “viewpoint-based” – e.g., not just shutting down a reporter because she brings up our Saudi Arabia policy, but because she seems critical of it.

CNN argued that it was precisely viewpoint discrimination at work in Acosta’s case: Acosta aggressively questioned Trump, sometimes critically, and Trump retaliated.

Despite denying this, the White House seemed to bolster CNN’s argument when it first put forth an explanation for the move against Acosta that appeared pretextual. Specifically, the White House claimed that Acosta had improperly touched an intern who tried to take the microphone away from him and released a video to support this allegation that appeared to have been doctored. Judge Kelly criticized this initial explanation, calling it “likely untrue and at least partly based on evidence of questionable accuracy.”

The White House’s later alternative explanation, that it was banning Acosta for his “rudeness” and unwillingness to yield the microphone to other reporters, struck the judge as insufficiently detailed to provide CNN and Acosta the process they were due.

Self-Censorship and Watchdog Function

The revocation did seem to present a non-trivial threat of a “chilling effect” on reporters covering the president. If a reporter’s aggressive questioning could get him thrown out, other journalists may self-censor, treading more lightly to stay on the president’s good side.

This kind of journalistic timidity could compromise the watchdog function that the White House press corps is supposed to provide, and on which our democracy depends. For that reason, many other media organizations filed “friend of the court” briefs in the case supporting CNN – even its archrival Fox News Channel, a conservative news network and stalwart Trump supporter.

In response to the ruling, the White House said it would promulgate rules of behavior for White House journalists. If reporters didn’t “behave,” Trump said, “we’ll end up back in court.”

Although the CNN case is technically still ongoing, with further hearings possible in the coming weeks, it seems likely that that the White House will allow the controversy to die for now. But if further blowups occur at future press conferences, involving CNN or other organizations, the federal courts may have to flesh out the free speech rules in this area.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share41Tweet
Steven Mulroy

Steven Mulroy

University of Memphis law professor and author of the forthcoming book 'Rethinking US Election Law'

Related Posts

US Capitol riot
National

Trump ‘More Likely Than Not’ Obstructed Congress: US Judge

by Staff Writer
March 28, 2022
A noose is seen on makeshift gallows as supporters of US President Donald Trump gather on the West side of the US Capitol in Washington DC on January 6, 2021
Opinion

How Praise and Blame Rhetoric Are Poisoning American Democracy

by Ryan Skinnell
November 2, 2021
Pro-abortion rights activists rally at the Texas State Capitol in Austin against SB8, September 11.
Featured

The Horrors of a Repressive Regime, American Style

by Stephen J. Lyons
October 26, 2021
US President Donald Trump
Featured

Trump Observes the Anniversary of the 9/11 Tragedy in the Brothel of Sports

by Edward C. Halperin
October 26, 2021
Members of the Ku Klux Klan arrive for a rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, on July 8
Featured

The New United States Census and the Chant of White Supremacists

by Edward C. Halperin
October 26, 2021
Israel violence
National

Trump Slams Biden ‘Weakness’ as Israel Violence Swells

by Staff Writer
May 11, 2021
Next Post
US President Donald Trump stands alongside Attorney General Jeff Sessions in the Oval Office of the White House when Sessions was just sworn in in February 2017

The Attorney General is not the Problem, the System is

Taliban fighters with their weapons in Afghanistan

Another Strategic Mistake in Afghanistan Peace Process: Omitting Local Actors

Recommended

Volkswagen logo

German Farmer Sues Volkswagen Over CO2 Emissions

May 20, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Russia Says Economy Grew 3.5 Percent in First Quarter

May 18, 2022
Mexico missing people

Over 100,000 People Reported Missing in Mexico, Data Reveals

May 17, 2022
Shireen Abu Akleh

Jerusalem Archbishop Condemns Israeli Police Raid at Journalist’s Funeral

May 16, 2022
A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
Israel

15 European Nations Urge Israel to Reverse Plans for More Settler Homes

May 13, 2022

Opinion

A Lebanese election official stands at a polling station

New Group Threatens Lebanese Elections… and Potentially Middle East Peace

May 18, 2022
A man holding a gun

Safely Back in USA, Land of Guns and Burgers

May 2, 2022
China Muslim Uyghurs

Unfair Politicization, Corruption, and the Death of Modern Olympism

April 23, 2022
Ukraine war

The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Hierarchies of Western Compassion

April 20, 2022
Chinese leader Xi Jinping

How Wrong ‘How China Can End the War in Ukraine’ Is

April 1, 2022
Ukraine children

The War for Ukraine’s Lives and Minds

March 30, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post