• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Thursday, January 26, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Globalization and Inequality: Sharing Wealth One of Society’s Greatest Challenges

William R. Hauk by William R. Hauk
01/30/19
in Opinion
A man looks at a mobile phone beside a woman begging on the pavement in Madrid on December 15, 2015

The top 1 percent of households in the US earn over 20 percent of the total national income. Photo: Gerard Julien, AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

One thing that nearly all observers of the American economy (and other developed countries around the world) can agree on is that income inequality has increased considerably in recent decades. The top 1 percent of households in the U.S. earned less than 10 percent of the total national income in 1980 but now earn over 20 percent. Income gains among the richest 0.01 percent of households are even more dramatic. The wage premium from having a college degree has also increased significantly during the same time.

The specter of a dynamic economy where the average income grows while those within the middle to lower economic classes see their standard of living stagnate has caused an increased focus on income inequality.

However, the sources of this increasing inequality are considerably more disputed. Two phenomena, also prominent in the last few decades, are typically cited: globalization and technological change.

Why is Inequality Increasing?

Globalization can increase wage inequality in a relatively rich country by increasing the imports of manufactured goods using predominantly low-skilled labor from developing countries. Conversely, it opens more opportunities for exports in high-tech firms that use more high-skilled labor. These two forces can widen the wage gap between high-skilled and low-skilled workers.

Technological change can also potentially increase wage inequality. Fewer secretaries, typists, or assembly-line workers are needed if computers and automation replace them in the production process. Conversely, newer technology can increase the demand for the services of, say, engineers who can service those machines.

While the two explanations are not mutually exclusive, for a long time, many economists tended to favor the technological explanation. If the trade was the stronger component of the story, then we would expect high-skill intensive industries to get bigger, while less-skill intensive industries got smaller. High-tech industries would expand as they serviced export markets. Older manufacturing industries, such as textiles, would disappear in the face of imports.

Changing Employment

While this story does explain some of what has happened to the U.S. economy, the evidence is that employment in the U.S. has changed more within sectors than across sectors. Instead of some sectors employing more workers while others employed less, each sector tended to change the composition of their workforce in the direction of more skilled workers. This observation is more consistent with the technological explanation than the globalization and trade explanation.

US President Donald Trump
Donald Trump. Photo: Nicholas Kamm, AFP

The policy implications are interesting. We may have some influence at the margin over globalization. Indeed, part of President Donald J. Trump’s agenda, both as a candidate and in office, has been to negotiate “fairer” trade deals that would likely have the effect of decreasing international trade. Reducing the rate of technological development, however, is a policy choice that would strike most politicians as neither feasible nor desirable.

The analysis above views trade and technology as competing explanations of wage inequality. However, a line of research that has developed over the last decade suggests that they may, in fact, be complementary.  Dating back to a model developed by economist Marc Melitz in 2003, recent research has focused on how trade may disproportionately benefit the most technologically advanced firms.

The upshot of this literature is that international trade presents more opportunities for the most productive firms in an industry. As trade barriers fall, high-productivity firms will be best positioned to take advantage of markets overseas. However, less-productive firms will likely be crowded out of an industry due to the expansion of their more productive competitors as well as imports. As a practical matter, “high-productivity” firms typically have disproportionately more high-skilled workers and high-tech capital than less productive firms.

Thus, while an industry does not necessarily need a change in its overall level of employment, exposure to international trade might change the composition of its employment. More trade tends to benefit the firms that employ the most high-skilled workers while hurting their less-skilled counterparts.

Regional Inequality

Also receiving attention in recent research is the extent to which some of these trade-induced changes can create regional inequality. Pioneering work by economists David Autor, David Dorn, and Gordon Hanson has shown that increased exposure to trade with China created large and persistent shocks to areas of the United States where import-competing firms were located.

In short, the relevant question does not seem to be whether globalization or technological change is increasing income inequality in the United States. They seem to be complementary, rather than competing explanations. The more important question is what policies, if any, might address this challenge.

Globalization and technological change both pose great opportunities for the world economy. Both have helped lead to historical reductions in global poverty. However, the by-product is an economy that has become increasingly divided into winners and losers from this process. How we share this wealth will be one of our greatest challenges as a society in the coming years.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share5Tweet
William R. Hauk

William R. Hauk

Professor of Economics at the University of South Carolina

Related Posts

George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York
Opinion

George Santos for Speaker!

by Stephen J. Lyons
January 16, 2023
Top view of the US House of Representatives
National

Chaos as US House Adjourns Without Choosing Speaker

by Staff Writer
January 4, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines
Opinion

Eight Billion and Counting…

by Stephen J. Lyons
November 29, 2022
Donald Trump
National

US Supreme Court Freezes Release of Trump Tax Returns

by Staff Writer
November 1, 2022
Donald Trump
National

US Capitol Riot Probe Votes to Subpoena Trump to Testify

by Staff Writer
October 13, 2022
Steve Bannon
National

Former Trump Advisor Bannon Charged With Fraud in New York

by Staff Writer
September 8, 2022
Next Post
US President Donald Trump

Trump Says US Intelligence Services 'Naive,' 'Wrong' on Iran

Facebook logo

Facebook Paid Users to Track Smartphone Use [Report]

Recommended

The Doomsday Clock reads 100 seconds to midnight, a decision made by The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, during an announcement at the National Press Club in Washington, DC on January 23, 2020

‘Doomsday Clock’ Moves Closest Ever to Midnight

January 25, 2023
Police work near the scene of a mass shooting in Monterey Park, California

California Lunar New Year Mass Shooter Dead, Motive Unclear: Police

January 23, 2023
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

Race on To Replace Ardern as New Zealand Prime Minister

January 20, 2023
Pfizer logo and vaccines

Pfizer to Sell More Drugs at Cost to Poor Nations

January 18, 2023
Rescuers inspect the wreckage at the site of a Yeti Airlines plane crash in Pokhara, Nepal

At Least 67 Killed in Nepal Plane Crash

January 16, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023

Opinion

George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines

Eight Billion and Counting…

November 29, 2022
Mahsa Amini protests

Imagining a Free Iran

October 24, 2022
Vladimir Putin

How 18th Century International Law Clarifies the Situation in Ukraine

September 29, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Falling for Putin

September 15, 2022
US President Donald Trump

Donald Trump Thanks You for Your Sacrifice

August 17, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post