• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Saturday, July 12, 2025
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home National

US Supreme Court Considers Case on Racial Redistricting

Staff Writer by Staff Writer
03/18/19
in National
Demonstrators protest outside the Supreme Court in 2017 as the court hears arguments about partisan gerrymandering.

Demonstrators protest outside the Supreme Court in 2017 as the court hears arguments about partisan gerrymandering. Photo: Jim Watson, AFP

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday takes up a lower court’s ruling that some Virginia districts were deliberately redrawn to diminish the impact of the African American vote – an urgent issue as the eastern swing state prepares for legislative elections.

The state, whose population is nearly 20 percent black, underwent redistricting in 2011 by the Republican-controlled House of Delegates, the lower house of the state legislature.

Residents mounted a legal challenge, arguing that the electoral map was drawn to concentrate African American voters in certain districts, in order to diminish their influence in other districts.

The stakes are important in a country where most blacks vote for Democrats, while whites tend to favor Republicans.


Gerrymandering 

Electoral redistricting, or “gerrymandering,” as it is widely known, has long been used by American political parties to gain advantage in elections.

The word gerrymandering was inspired by a 19th-century Republican governor, Elbridge Gerry, who redrew a district in his state to such an extent it was said to resemble a salamander.

Next week, partisan gerrymandering is back in front of the Supreme Court. So we looked at House election results from 1992-2018 to see how a party's vote share corresponded with the seats they won. It's not what you'd imagine … https://t.co/NNH3xpEAoP pic.twitter.com/eKKhGsdmES

— Sarah E. Frostenson (@sfrostenson) March 18, 2019

A lower court found in favor of the plaintiffs but the Supreme Court, the first time it took up the issue, found that the court’s arguments were flawed and sent the case back.

In its new ruling, the lower court found that voters’ skin color had played a preponderant role in the mapping of 11 districts, in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

The court’s judges approved a redistricting map drawn up to correct the 2011 map, and analysts say the changes appear to favor Democrats.


What’s Next? 

The House of Delegates’ majority Republicans are appealing the lower court ruling to the Supreme Court.

The nation’s top court must first decide whether the Republican members of the lower house have standing to appeal the ruling. Normally, it would fall to the state’s attorney general to appeal but Virginia’s attorney general, a Democrat, has opted not to.

If the Supreme Court decides in favor of the Republicans’ appeal, it will then proceed to rule on the substance of the case.

Its task is not easy because the Voting Rights Act, the 1965 law that sought to remove barriers to African Americans exercising their right to vote, allows black voters to be grouped in districts to ensure they have some representatives.

But it is illegal to concentrate black voters in certain districts in order to weaken their overall electoral impact.

The Supreme Court should rule before the summer, but It’s possible that would come too late for the next state election on November 5, when all seats in Virginia’s House of Delegates and Senate are up for grabs.


More on the Subject 

Academic research on the topic shows a broad consensus that the notion that voter fraud has any effect on electoral outcomes is a myth. Voter suppression, however, remains a real and serious threat to American democracy.

Despite the abundance of evidence that illegal voting does not meaningfully impact elections, many states have taken measures ostensibly aimed at cracking down on it. These measures – advertently or inadvertently – can disenfranchise people in vulnerable demographics by making it difficult or impossible for them to vote.

North Carolina legislators passed a law in 2013 gutting early voting opportunities, limiting the number of polling locations and strictly requiring certain kinds of identification to cast ballots.

A federal court later struck down the law, saying it targeted African Americans with “surgical precision.”

Voter Fraud is a Myth. Voter Suppression is Very Real.

 

Share9Tweet
Staff Writer

Staff Writer

AFP with The Globe Post

Related Posts

US Supreme Court abortion
National

US Supreme Court Allows Abortion Providers to Challenge Texas Law

by Staff Writer
December 10, 2021
Nestle is asking the court to block the suit against them from going forward
National

US Supreme Court Considers Firms’ Liability for Africa Child Slavery

by Staff Writer
December 1, 2020
A man waves a rainbow flag as he rides by the US Supreme Court that released a decision that says federal law protects LGBTQ workers from discrimination on June 15, 2020 in Washington,DC.
Featured

Unmasking the ‘Right to Harm:’ the US Supreme Court and the Attack on LGBTQ Lives

by Jonathan Branfman
October 26, 2021
Chief Gregory Brown.
Interviews

Black and Blue: A Conversation With Leesburg’s First Black Police Chief

by Josephine Walker
August 31, 2020
Children look through the border fence in Ciudad Juarez at the US-Mexico border on January 31, 2020
National

US Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ Asylum Policy

by Staff Writer
March 11, 2020
Abortion rights activists rally in front of the US Supreme Court in Washington on a day of nationwide demonstrations seeking to push back against laws restricting abortion access that have been passed in Republican-led states
National

Future of Abortion at Stake in US Supreme Court Case

by Staff Writer
March 4, 2020
Next Post
Hanif Hamgam Afghanistan

Afghanistan Celebrates Journalists as Violence Targets Press

Russian President Vladimir Putin. Photo: Reuters

Putin Signs Laws Against 'Disrespecting' Authorities, Fake news

Recommended

UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese

UN Says US Sanctions on Expert Sets ‘Dangerous Precedent,’ Must Be Reversed

July 11, 2025
Women in Afghanistan wearing a blue burqa

ICC Seeks Arrest of Taliban Leaders Over Persecution of Women

July 9, 2025
Kenya, Nairobi, 2024-07-16. Protesters in the streets

Nairobi Tense as Kenya Marks Democracy Uprising

July 7, 2025
President Donald Trump

Trump Wins ‘Phenomenal’ Victory as Congress Passes Flagship Bill

July 4, 2025
University students march in protest towards the Istanbul Municipality in Sarachane as they demonstrate against the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu in Istanbul, Turkey, on March 21, 2025.

‘Remember Charlie Hebdo!’ Protesters Seethe at Istanbul Magazine

July 2, 2025
US President Donald Trump

US Senate Edges Towards Vote on Trump’s Divisive Spending Bill

June 30, 2025

Opinion

Donald Trump

Fact vs. Fiction: The Trump Administration’s Dubious War on Reverse Discrimination

June 18, 2025
Tens of thousands of protestors shut down Fifth Avenue in Manhattan on Saturday, April 5, 2025, protesting the Trump administration's abuse of the separation of federal powers as well as the deep cuts to governmental services overseen by presidential advisor Elon Musk.

Civil Society Is Holding the Line. Will Washington Notice?

June 17, 2025
A Black Lives Matter mural in New York City.

Fuhgeddaboudit! America’s Erasure of History

April 2, 2025
Bust of Deputy Rubens Paiva in the Chamber of Deputies

Democratic Brazilians Are Still Here

March 18, 2025
A woman from Guatemala

Dispatch From Central America

January 28, 2025
US President Donald Trump

Dear Trump Supporters: Is This the America You Wanted?

January 28, 2025
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post