• About Us
  • Who Are We
  • Work With Us
Wednesday, February 8, 2023
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Globe Post
39 °f
New York
44 ° Fri
46 ° Sat
40 ° Sun
41 ° Mon
No Result
View All Result
The Globe Post
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Economic Inequality: Who Cares?

Frank Stilwell by Frank Stilwell
02/06/19
in Opinion
Children of a homeless family play by their roadside shanty in New Delhi

Children of a homeless family play by their roadside shanty in New Delhi. Photo: Prakash Singh, AFP

13
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Concern with economic inequality is a defining feature of the current era. Prominent international public figures, ranging from Pope Francis to International Monetary Fund’s Chairwoman Christine Lagarde, have declared global economic inequality to be the top priority.

What are the preconditions for moving from talk to action? Relevant information, effective policy instruments, and the necessary political will stand out as key elements.

There is no lack of relevant information. Excellent data is being regularly published by French political economist Thomas Piketty and his colleagues at World Inequality Lab. A new report from U.K.-based international aid agency Oxfam links key information with a program for action.

Oxfam has a long track record of campaigning in this area, emphasizing the connection between global poverty and economic inequality. Its new report includes some jaw-dropping information.

Findings of Oxfam report on inequality

For example, the world’s richest 26 people now own the same amount of wealth as the poorest half of humanity. During 2018, billionaires around the world increased their combined fortunes by a daily average of $2.5 billion. Meanwhile, nearly half of humanity languishes on incomes below $5.50 per day or its equivalent in local spending power. Inequalities according to race and gender are interwoven throughout.

These are the features of a grossly, some would say grotesquely, unequal world.

Extreme Inequality: a Necessary Price?

Does it matter? Some say not, arguing that extreme inequality is a necessary price to be paid for giving “wealth-creators” the necessary “economic freedoms.” Winners in the marketplace prosper, others miss out. Trying to level the playing field would undermine economic incentives, reduce economic growth and lower average living standards.

The Oxfam report points to the flaws in this conservative complacency. It cites the results of research undertaken at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), showing that inequality is not conducive to good economic performance in practice. More egalitarian nations tend to do better than the more unequal ones. That this research finding comes from a generally conservative institution like the IMF is significant.

Oxfam‘s report also cites other social science research, showing significant correlations between inequality and the incidence of social problems. The more unequal nations have generally poorer physical and mental health, higher rates of crime and incarceration, inferior rates of educational attainment, and weaker environmental protection policies. As British epidemiologists Richard G. Wilkinson and Kate Pickett point out, anything that undermines social cohesion and public trust tends to reduce both individual and social wellbeing.

How Can Inequality be Reduced?

The inference is that reduction of inequality, both within nations and worldwide, is necessary. Poverty cannot be eliminated without simultaneously addressing the structures and processes that facilitate extreme concentration of wealth.

Waiting for the wealth to “trickle down” is a discredited strategy, little more than an ideological excuse for policy inaction. Piecemeal redistribution from rich to poor is not adequate either. The challenge is to develop institutional arrangements that make more equitable outcomes a normal feature of the political-economic system.

There are plenty of policies suitable for this purpose, given the political will to use them. Minimum wages can be raised. Taxes can be made more progressive and more focussed on accumulated wealth. These tax revenues could finance guaranteed basic income for all households, thereby setting a floor to distributional inequality. Or they could fund improvements in public infrastructure and services.

The willingness of governments to embrace redistributive policies varies considerably, of course. Among the more economically developed nations, there are two broad clusters. One, headed by the United States, has high inequality of income, wealth and power and current political leaders committed to their perpetuation. The trickle-down myth lives on, despite all empirical evidence to the contrary. In the other cluster, including the European nations and the Nordic states especially, there is more emphasis on the role of progressive taxation and welfare state expenditures as a means of countering the tendencies towards greater inequality.

Among the poorer nations, there is also a great diversity of experience. China and India, the world’s two most populous nations, have had outstanding macroeconomic performance over the last three decades, but internal economic inequalities have risen sharply.

Elsewhere, especially in many of the countries of sub-Saharan Africa, the problems of poverty have become yet more intense and widespread.

Reward Work, Not Wealth

Oxfam is to be applauded for drawing attention to these inequalities and the resulting problems. But parading the latest data on growing economic inequalities and showing the adverse social consequences is evidently not enough. Indeed, the numbers alone may tend to engender more fatigue than outrage, especially in the light of the apparent incapacity or unwillingness of current international institutions to turn the situation around.

Recognizing this, the title of the latest Oxfam report – “Public Good or Private Wealth?” – seems to signal a fundamental re-think. Its dominant message is the need for a social provision of public goods. This links the rich-poor inequality to the inequality between public and private wealth.

A man looks at a mobile phone beside a woman begging on the pavement in Madrid on December 15, 2015
The top 1 percent of households in the US earn over 20 percent of the total national income. Photo: Gerard Julien, AFP

Indeed, societies with more wealth in public rather than private hands are better able to provide social services – public housing, public education, public health, public transport, and public childcare, for example – and to do so freely or at low prices that poor people may afford. Public provision of this sort can ensure that all people have the basics for a decent existence even if their money incomes are meager. Thus, social provision, funded by taxing wealth, can create fairer societies.

Could it also create more fairness worldwide?

The poorer nations would only be able to undertake the social provision of this sort if international development aid were to be markedly increased. The affluent nations currently have a formal commitment to allocating 0.7 percent of their GDP for this purpose, but only five currently hit this target. The U.S. and Australia give only about a quarter of their due share. Meeting the international aid commitment, and targeting its allocation to the social provision of public goods, is crucial if the global situation is to improve.

It is ultimately in the interests of all of us all – rich and poor, within and across nations – to pursue social justice, economic security, ecological sustainability, and peace. Equity is integral to all these goals. Are the world’s leaders listening?

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of The Globe Post.
Share13Tweet
Frank Stilwell

Frank Stilwell

Emeritus Professor of Political Economy at the University of Sydney, Australia, and author of the book ‘The Political Economy of inequality’ which will be published this year by Polity Press

Related Posts

A supermarket in Glendale, California
Opinion

Why Some Inflated Prices Won’t Come Down: Ramen and Eggs Tell the Tale

by Justin Fendos
March 9, 2022
Dollar bills held against a world map
Opinion

The Global Tax Won’t Fix Historically High Inequality, It Will Make It Worse

by Benjamin Waddell
February 21, 2022
United States military
Opinion

Biden Signs Another Blank Check for the Rapacious Military Economy

by Stephen J. Lyons
January 6, 2022
Why Not Equality for America’s Puerto Rican Men and Women?
Featured

Why Not Equality for America’s Puerto Rican Men and Women?

by Matt Helder and José A. Cabrera
October 26, 2021
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris stand with their spouses Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff after delivering their victory speeches.
Featured

Today We Celebrate This Win, but Tomorrow We Get Back to Work

by Saadia Khan
October 26, 2021
EU Proposes Huge Aid Plan as Virus Hammers Latin America
World

Pandemic Could Push 45 Million in Latin America Into Poverty: UN

by Staff Writer
July 10, 2020
Next Post
Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte and the army.

Philippines to Charge Time 'Person of the Year' Winning Journalist

Women and children living in the Rukban camp along the Syria-Jordan border in 2016.

Aid Convoy Reaches Desperate Syrians in Rukban: Red Crescent

Recommended

An AFP journalist views an example of a "deepfake" video manipulated using artificial intelligence.

Deepfake ‘News Anchors’ in Pro-China Footage: Research

February 8, 2023
Syrian rescuers and civilians search for victims and survivors amid the rubble of a collapsed building, in the rebel-held northern countryside of Syria's Idlib province on the border with Turkey, early on February 6, 2023. Syrian rescuers (White Helmets) and civilians search for victims and survivors amid the rubble of a collapsed building

Quake Kills Over 1,200 Across Turkey, Syria

February 6, 2023
Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
A supporter of nurses' strike and NHS holds a placard

UK Faces Fresh Mass Strikes as Wage Talks Derail

February 1, 2023
Israeli security forces in Jerusalem

Palestinian Gunman Kills 7 in East Jerusalem Synagogue Attack

January 30, 2023
The Doomsday Clock reads 100 seconds to midnight, a decision made by The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, during an announcement at the National Press Club in Washington, DC on January 23, 2020

‘Doomsday Clock’ Moves Closest Ever to Midnight

January 25, 2023

Opinion

Protesters rally against the fatal police assault of Tyre Nichols, outside of the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center in Detroit, Michigan, on January 27, 2023

How Do Violent ‘Monsters’ Take Root?

February 3, 2023
George Santos from the 3rd Congressional district of New York

George Santos for Speaker!

January 16, 2023
Commuters waiting for buses in Metro Manila. Philippines

Eight Billion and Counting…

November 29, 2022
Mahsa Amini protests

Imagining a Free Iran

October 24, 2022
Vladimir Putin

How 18th Century International Law Clarifies the Situation in Ukraine

September 29, 2022
Vladimir Putin

Falling for Putin

September 15, 2022
Facebook Twitter

Newsletter

Do you like our reporting?
SUBSCRIBE

About Us

The Globe Post

The Globe Post is part of Globe Post Media, a U.S. digital news organization that is publishing the world's best targeted news sites.

submit oped

© 2018 The Globe Post

No Result
View All Result
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
  • Democracy at Risk
    • Media Freedom
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Columns
    • Book Reviews
    • Stage
  • Submit Op-ed

© 2018 The Globe Post